The age of consent ...(sex)

Recommended Videos

firedfns13

New member
Jun 4, 2009
1,177
0
0
Srkkl said:
Julianking93 said:
I don't think there should be an age of consent.

The age of consent doesn't make any difference. If people are gonna fuck, they're gonna fuck no matter what the law says.

People say that "The age of consent cuts down on rapes" Oh, fuck off! A rapist isn't gonna give a shit what the law says. He's already gonna rape someone, he's not gonna be like, "Oh, your just 17, I shouldn't rape you today."
It's more statchatory rape, for those older men taking advantage of ignorant young girls. Like if your 20 and the girl is 15 even if she consents it's still rape.

OT: Here in the US I believe it's at a reletivley good age. (16).
The federal law here in the US is 18.
However, I'm certain that is for any age. If you're within 3 years(this part I heard from a friend so I could be wrong) it's the state law, which varies between 16 and 18, with my home state of IL being 17 according to wikipedia.
 

Flap Jack452

New member
Jan 5, 2009
1,998
0
0
popdafoo said:
Almost exactly what I was going to say. In no way does it cut down on rape at all. Isn't it technically rape to be like 19 and have sex with a 17 year old or something? I'm not completely sure of the exact laws but still there is no good reason to have a law on this.
It's viewed as rape in a court if a 18 year old has sex with a 17 year old. Even if it was consensual I'm pretty sure the 18 year old would be charged with rape.
 

LordWalter

New member
Sep 19, 2009
343
0
0
I will support whatever country has an age of consent low enough to allow me to hit this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AR_Ex_1Tsos&feature=player_profilepage



Post Script: Oh mighty wielder of the Banhammer, spare me from your all-consuming wrath, I did this for the good of mankind.
 

fuzzball

New member
Jun 7, 2009
71
0
0
faceless chick said:
ravens_nest said:
faceless chick said:
18 here, doesn't matter, most people have sex before they're 16 anyway.
It's not legal but who cares..as long as it's not a result or rape/other legal problems, it's ok.
What about statutory rape?

Does this exist in your country? It would mean that say I had sex with a 15 year old, I would be liable to be charged with statutory rape as the girl would have been under the age of consent. I would be jailed, put on the sex offenders list and branded a peadophile for the rest of my life...

Would it be worth it?...

Depends...
Of course, legally you would be charged with pedophilia, but like I said, if she had sex willingly with you and didn't complain to the authorities, you don't have a problem.

The real problem comes when underage girls don't use protection..which is a lot of them, considering we have sex education at the age of 14 AND 16. -_-
I am not sure, pretty much every girl at my school is on the pill by 8th grade or highschool, not just for sex, but also to help with their menstrual cycles or something like that.
 

Mozared

New member
Mar 26, 2009
1,607
0
0
ravens_nest said:
22, but I was posing the question more along the guise of would anyone find anyone having sex with a 16 repulsive. The ladies love having sex with me, as if any one would question that, pffft...
Then in your case, it would be a 'meh' situation. I said it in a topic a couple of days ago; I don't believe a teenager dating somebody above 20 (unless it's a 19-year old dating a 21-year old) can be true love - I think in most cases the older guy is just looking for sex and the younger girl is looking for someone to look up to. Regardless, I don't condemn it. 16 and 22 would be starting to push it, and I probably wouldn't do it, but I won't complain about it.

As for me, I wouldn't find it too repulsive as my gap would only be half as big as yours.
 

Cavouku

New member
Mar 14, 2008
1,122
0
0
Oh, and this is kind of amusing. My father is 45. His girlfriend; 25.

Yep, after you've crossed about 20 (most places average?), the gap can be as big as wanted, huh?
 

Ocelano

New member
Apr 14, 2009
455
0
0
Valate said:
Julianking93 said:
George144 said:
Julianking93 said:
I don't think there should be an age of consent.

The age of consent doesn't make any difference. If people are gonna fuck, they're gonna fuck no matter what the law says.

People say that "The age of consent cuts down on rapes" Oh, fuck off! A rapist isn't gonna give a shit what the law says. He's already gonna rape someone, he's not gonna be like, "Oh, your just 17, I shouldn't rape you today."
Ahh but then you have the whole paedophilia thing, which is what the age of consent is meant to protect against, because a 40 year old man could easily claim that he got consent from a 6 year old and legally it would all be fine and dandy. Still I think the age of 16 is fine, people who are younger then that and consenting will get on with it anyway (its not like either of thems going to tell the police) but it prevents weird child sex crap.
Yes, but wouldn't that go under the catiegory of rape? He's not gonna care what the law says. True, there should be something to prevent against that.

How about, the legal age of consent is when you have the ability to reproduce?
What if someone's sterile? (Like me...)
I think They meant when You hit puberty I suppose for people with medical conditions/injuries which would prevent that, not that I know of any but then I am not a doctor, there would be an age of definition. Of course if the ability to have sex is linked to the ability to grow Pubic hair the number of teen girl's who keep theirs shaved would probably drop, also would be a heck of a thing to prove to whichever cop is trying to determine wether it is a case of statutory rape
 

Bjornfree

New member
Oct 26, 2009
4
0
0
Actually in the United States it is up the each individual state to set their age of consent. The only guideline is that it has to be between 16 and 18. The majority of the states set it at 16. Then there are all kinds of laws about age differences and how old you can be to actually have sex which is different than the age of consent. Crazy law makers!
 

rhyno435

New member
Apr 24, 2009
1,210
0
0
Well, I'm not sure about Canada but I'm pretty sure it's 18. Doesn't matter though, most people are gonna do it by the time they're 16 anyways.

Not me though, I'm playing it safe.
 

Chancie

New member
Sep 23, 2009
2,050
0
0
I want to say there shouldn't really be an age of consent. If both people know what they're doing and are mature enough to handle it, I think it would be ok. But...a lot of the young people having sex aren't the mature ones so it throws that idea out the window.

I'm in Colorado and I know ours is age 16, which I'd say is a good age.
 

Booze Zombie

New member
Dec 8, 2007
7,416
0
0
If you've met a sexually active 10 year old, there's probably something a bit worse than age of consent to worry about.

For the record, I have not met one, but I'm just saying.
 
Aug 25, 2009
4,611
0
0
There's a joint problem in that some people are ready for sex (mentally and physically) ahead of the age of consent. But then again, the age of consent is a good way to keep from predation by paedophiles etc. Then again, it was instituted in many cases in times when attitudes were different. The American age of 18 for example is often seen by Europeans as being unnecessarily restrictive.

But if the age is too low, or non-existant, you suddenly have a rash of teen pregnancies (and younger) and the rampant spread of STDs. Or it may go the other way, and when people stop making such a fuss about it, it doesn't matter, and stops being a badge one has to earn.

Or of course, it could be actually comprehensively taught in schools, drilled into students heads to not make the mistakes they can avoid, but I don't want to sound crazy and liberal here.
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
It should have a general age limit, then a grey area

i don't see why a 16 year old boy and a 15 year old girl isn't allowed, even if the girl is only 2 months from 16, its not like she's going to turn 16 and go "OH SNAP, I'M SMARTER NOW AND AUTOMATICALLY USE CONDOMS!"
 

Lonan

New member
Dec 27, 2008
1,243
0
0
Age really has nothing to do with it, I find the whole "16 year-old" and "18 year-old" thing ridiculous. Rulings should be based on common sense. There's an incident where a guy who had been around the sun 15 times had sex with a 37 year old woman. Thanks to the Conservatives raising the age of consent to 16 from 14, that woman is now a child molester and will have a MINIMUM sentence of 10 years. The "victim" gets no punishment, since he apparently didn't know what he was doing, or some ultra right-wing or ultra left-wing crap.

Having gone to an all boys-boarding school, I like to think of it this way. What if a bunch of woman came to the girl-starved people of our grade 7-12 school? Would it be fair to tell the grade 7 and 8's that they need to basically have gay sex with each other if they want some? (age of consent 14) Would it be fair to say that all juniors, many of whom have already done it, are too young? (age of consent 16) Is it fair to say that the whole hormone raging teenage boy school, MOST of whom have already done it are still too young? (age of consent 18, U.S.) All of those scenarios are bullshit.

However, it would be fair to say that most of those people would not want a 40 year-old gay man to have their way with them, so that little bit of common sense could be put in. Until you're 18, you can't have sex with a guy more than one year older or younger than you, or something like that. But please, let's stop basing things on ancient Old-World tradition (you become a man at 16 or whatever) and religion (pre-martial sex is bad. Just go with it; unless you like fire so much you want it to engulf you for an eternity) please, Canada doesn't need no-sense things like putting a woman in jail for giving someone the best experience of his whole life.
If a bomb was dropped every time common sense was ignored, we wouldn't have to worry about saving the planet, because it would already be gone.
 

ProfessorLayton

Elite Member
Nov 6, 2008
7,452
0
41
Flap Jack452 said:
It's viewed as rape in a court if a 18 year old has sex with a 17 year old. Even if it was consensual I'm pretty sure the 18 year old would be charged with rape.
See now that's what I don't agree with. That's just silly and there's no reason to classify it as rape.
 

Kimarous

New member
Sep 23, 2009
2,011
0
0
People will probaby label me a weirdo for saying this, but I have a very old-school "old enough to bleed, old enough to breed" mentality; as long as they've hit puberty, I don't have issue with them doing the deed... under the correct circumstances, of course (for example, two 12-year-olds who had an arranged marriage), and within a country/society's legality.
 

Ph33nix

New member
Jul 13, 2009
1,243
0
0
ravens_nest said:
So, in the world there are different laws about how old you have to be before you can give consent to having sex. As in what age is it legal for you to have sex.

In the UK it's 16

In the US mostly it's 18 right?

What are the differences in other countries and how do you feel this reflects on your country?

Do you agree with the laws in your country? Or do you feel that they should be higher or lower? If so, why?

Would you find the idea of me having sex with a 16 year old repulsive and/or peadophillic? If so, why?

Another point is that it is illegal to have gay sex until you are 18 in the UK (I think?). Is that fair?

Keyword is maturity with this topic guys...
the US has switched to 16