The Avengers and Hawkeye [Mass Opinion Centered]

Recommended Videos

Jodah

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,280
0
0
DrgoFx said:
Alright...I need to get this out. Like many people, I saw the Avengers movie and like many people I thought it was awesome. My main problem right now is the community reaction to the characters. Yes, Ironman, Captain America, The Hulk and Thor are all the main focal points, Hawkeye and Black Widow being the two side projects that wandered in to complete the original team, but really. Black Widow has nothing but "Lolboobs" everywhere I go and Hawkeye is called lame for using a bow.

Let's get this straight. Hawkeye, a secret agent who has dead-accurate aim and could pinpoint an arrow to pierce through your clothing, skin, ribs and heart at the perfect angel to kill you instantly, is lame? What kind of thinking is that? Did we watch the same movie? The guy, with ONE FUCKING ARROW makes an explosion so large in the Shield aircraft's turbine that the whole thing was at risk to plummet. Not to mention, did you see him miss a shot during that last battle? The guy is smart as all fuck, too. He knew Loki would catch his arrow, so he shoots and explosive arrow to him and blows it in his face. Really, the mere thought of stating this guy is lame baffles. Even in Comparison to the other Avengers.
I just hate him because he is a lazy rip off of Green Arrow. Nothing against his movie portrayal. My problem is with the Marvel character himself.
 

fatmrbunko

New member
Jan 24, 2011
82
0
0
SPOILERS




1. guy gets brainwashed insantly
2. he only screws the ship up like that because of his gadgets i mean id like to see him do that with a normal arrow
3. he doesnt really do much for the good guys he just takes out a few bad guys with his arrows and all the call stuff he does are because of the gadgets he was given
4. black widow knocks him out cold and beats his ass
5.the whole build up for his beef with loki ends up in failure... i wanna put an arrow in his eye oh look at that he caught it... because hes against at 21st century archer
 

Ilikemilkshake

New member
Jun 7, 2010
1,977
0
0
TheCaptain said:
I he didn't really have much of a chance to shine, since
he spent a good part of the movie under Loki's control

I think that his time spent under Loki's control was where he shined, he completely tore through all of shields defences and made shield look pretty incompetent (admittedly that isn't hard to do) he seemed like an actual threat.

He did get overshadowed in the final battle though but i still think 'lesser' characters are needed for the story.. You can't have Iron Man sitting on a roof as a lookout, you need Hawkeye for that.

EDIT: also for people saying using a Bow is lame... how would guns have improved him? Half of his usefulness came from the fact his bow has extreme range and his arrows are multi purpose. Unless you can get a sniper rifle with timed explosive rounds or grappling hook rounds, his bow is just about the best thing out there.
 

DEAD34345

New member
Aug 18, 2010
1,929
0
0
"Lame" is pretty much the best word that could be used to describe him, as far as I can tell. Judging by The Avengers movie alone (and I'm sure he's much better in the comics etc), he's just crap. His personality is not interesting (does he actually have one?), his super power is "being good at shooting a bow" for Christ's sake and he does precisely one memorable thing in the entire movie, which is that explosive arrow part.

You could remove him from the film entirely and it wouldn't change in the slightest. The mooks would attack and destroy the Shield aircraft by themselves with a bazooka or something, and I dunno, Iron man would blast Loki at that one part I guess. Or whoever else was nearby.

"The guy, with ONE FUCKING ARROW makes an explosion so large in the Shield aircraft's turbine that the whole thing was at risk to plummet."

Yeah, that's not impressive at all really. Wasn't he given explosive arrows? The only impressive part about him is his aim (as far as I know after watching the movie), and that alone isn't really enough to make me care.
 

toomuchnothing

New member
Jul 5, 2010
160
0
0
DVS BSTrD said:
He and Black Widow deserve their own origin movie.
Take out the "origin" part and you got yourself a deal.

fatmrbunko said:
SPOILERS
2. he only screws the ship up like that because of his gadgets i mean id like to see him do that with a normal arrow
By that logic doesn't Stark do literally nothing without his suit ? I'd like to see him restart the helicarrier's engine in an Armani.
 

Fappy

\[T]/
Jan 4, 2010
12,010
0
41
Country
United States
Supertegwyn said:
overpuce said:
Having not seen the movie yet (though I probably will this weekend), I would say that you're right when basing you opinions on not only the movie (that I haven't seen yet) and other sources (comic books). I would like to say though, I don't think that casting Jeremy Renner was exactly the right move for Hawkeye. My initial reaction (again, having not seen the movie) is that he doesn't fit the character. He's a great actor for sure but I'm not sure if he was a great choice for the part. I'll have to see that when I see it.
Jeremy Renner is pretty damn awesome as Hawkeye.

I like him in the role.
Jeremy Renner did a great job portraying the Ultimates version of Hawkeye, which is what this film was ultimately shooting for anyway. Kind of would have preferred classic Hawkeye though :(
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
remnant_phoenix said:
I haven't seen the movie yet, but I've always been a Hawkeye fan. He was my favorite character to play as in the old "Captain America and the Avengers" beat-em-up and I've always liked the characters who excel because of gadgets/finely-tuned skills/intellect, rather than just superpowers.

I mean, this is what Batman does, and when discussing the Justice League, no one calls Batman "a lame wanna-be superhero who is just a regular guy with gadgets and superbly-trained skills who pales in comparison to powerhouses like Superman and the Green Lantern."

The only concrete difference is that Batman has a widespread, devoted fan-base while Hawkeye is a much more obscure character, therefore Hawkeye is easier to dismiss.
Erm. Batman doesn't have to revolve everything around an obsolete weapon that's his sole purpose for existing. He might write "bat" on everything he owns, but that's not the same as making everything an arrow.

Now, if he had a magic bow and arrows, fine, Thor has a magic hammer, whatever. As it is, it's just silly.
 

TheCaptain

A Guy In A Hat
Feb 7, 2012
391
0
0
Ilikemilkshake said:
I think that his time spent under Loki's control was where he shined, he completely tore through all of shields defences and made shield look pretty incompetent (admittedly that isn't hard to do) he seemed like an actual threat.
Just dawned on me, you're right. It was far more impressive when he took out the Helicarrier engine - with the careful taking aim and still hitting the inside of the engine through the wind and whatnot - than the overly flashy stuff in the final battle (like when he shot the "Chitauri" behind him without even looking) which made him look like Legolas.

toomuchnothing said:
By that logic doesn't Stark do literally nothing without his suit ? I'd like to see him restart the helicarriers engine in an Armani.
Well, the suit and the tech are kinda part of Tony. Also, he gets to be more entertaining both in and out of the suit.

Also, even if we go with the statement that both are only as good as there gadgets... If you could have either a full flying spiffy-looking suit of power armor with a built-in link to your personal assistant AI or a pretty usual-looking modern bow and a quiver that screws a variety of arrowheads on yout arrows, which one would you want?
 

DrgoFx

New member
Aug 30, 2011
768
0
0
Dastardly said:
DrgoFx said:
Alright...I need to get this out. Like many people, I saw the Avengers movie and like many people I thought it was awesome. My main problem right now is the community reaction to the characters. Yes, Ironman, Captain America, The Hulk and Thor are all the main focal points, Hawkeye and Black Widow being the two side projects that wandered in to complete the original team, but really. Black Widow has nothing but "Lolboobs" everywhere I go and Hawkeye is called lame for using a bow.
I think Joss Whedon did a phenomenal job at giving both Black Widow and Hawkeye really strong moments. The man knows how to balance an ensemble of characters, and he made sure that they both played pivotal (but believable) roles in the story.
This is in reply with everyone, YES. Joss Whedon is amazing with team balancing and just having a team blend well together. I personally wouldn't had thought Bruce and Tony would become best buddies, and Black Widow as a character was pretty threatening.

Cept in that last battle...I think her dinky little pistols weren't that effective. At least Hawkeye's arrows could fucking explode.

And yes, when I ask people personally "Oh yeah, Hawkeye was a bamf." But when I look across the internet, I don't see any of that. Like many people said, for being on a team with a rage monster, a god, a super soldier and a suit of armor, Hawkeye does a pretty good job at holding his own weight.

Not to mention he nearly murdered all of them half way through the movie.
 

Thedutchjelle

New member
Mar 31, 2009
784
0
0
I wasn't bothered by Black Widow being a woman at all. Only here on the internet I read the typical teenage-male reactions.

I'm fine with all characters. Hawkeye was in my opinion just as good as the others - the accuracy has with a bow is nearly godlike anyway ~_~
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
Spot1990 said:
See I don't like him for the same reason I don't like Batman, he doesn't have superpowers but does things that aren't just good, they're supernatural. Constantine is what a normal guy facing powerful foes is actually like. If you're going to have them be that superior to every other human on the planet just give them powers. Otherwise it's just cop out lazy writing so fans can say "He's just a bad ass, he doesn't even need powers to keep up." Bullshit, he does have superpowers even if the writers won't admit it. He hits a moving target that he's not looking at without even seeing it coming. One of those aliens was flying past him in the background and without looking (how did he even know it was fucking there, it wasn't even close to him) he aims behind himself and fires. Bullshit. That's a superpower.
Exactly. Magic him magic or go away. Or have him played by Milla Jovovich, I guess.
 

toomuchnothing

New member
Jul 5, 2010
160
0
0
TheCaptain said:
Also, even if we go with the statement that both are only as good as there gadgets... If you could have either a full flying spiffy-looking suit of power armor with a built-in link to your personal assistant AI or a pretty usual-looking modern bow and a quiver that screws a variety of arrowheads on yout arrows, which one would you want?
First of all I don't believe I ever said either was only as good as their gadgets since I was responding to someone else's comment that was along those lines. Secondly,its not a matter of want or choice you get both because they are on the same team. The whole last 40 minutes of the film showed that they complemented each other and thats the only reason they came out on top.

Just take for example when Hawkeye is calling out group movements and patterns and Stark is being chased down by 6 or so speeders, Hawkeye points out the fact that they can't turn on a dime and suggest Stark take them into some sharp turns. He does exactly that killing them all. Could Hawkeye or Stark have done that alone? No.

This isn't making a sports team and deciding who gets to play and who gets benched.
 

FamoFunk

Dad, I'm in space.
Mar 10, 2010
2,628
0
0
Jeremy Renner 10/10 would bang.

I thought Hawkeye was pretty awesome and just as useful as Hulk, Iron Man and Cpt America.
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
Out of the group, Hawk Eye and Blackwidow are boring. How they can survive along with super powered group mates is unrealistic. They would both be fucked within the first fight. She cant go toe to toe with the villians and Hawkeye can be killed easily and its not like he is a sniper who kills from afar. He is there in the middle of it all.
 

DrgoFx

New member
Aug 30, 2011
768
0
0
remnant_phoenix said:
I haven't seen the movie yet, but I've always been a Hawkeye fan. He was my favorite character to play as in the old "Captain America and the Avengers" beat-em-up and I've always liked the characters who excel because of gadgets/finely-tuned skills/intellect, rather than just superpowers.

I mean, this is what Batman does, and when discussing the Justice League, no one calls Batman "a lame wanna-be superhero who is just a regular guy with gadgets and superbly-trained skills who pales in comparison to powerhouses like Superman and the Green Lantern."

The only concrete difference is that Batman has a widespread, devoted fan-base while Hawkeye is a much more obscure character, therefore Hawkeye is easier to dismiss.
Honestly, I think Ironman is a better representation of Batman, but that's my thinking. Although I do agree, Batman is at the same level of useful in the Justice League as Hawkeye is in the Avengers. But someone once said, the Justice League isn't much of a team, but a collection of heroes to give them an excuse to team up easily. The Avengers on the other hand are actually a team of heroes, each specialized to do their part. Hawkeye isn't just there to be there, he has a reason for being there. Hawkeye and Black Widow, as the movie hints at, and the comics play out, are the Infiltration pair. Black Widows' the spy, Hawkeye's the sniper.

Hell, the Avengers fall under this specialized team thing so well, you could literally pair every member with a role in an MMO. Hell, I spent a long while thinking who was what D&D class. Hawkeye's a ranger, Black Widow's a rogue, Iron Man's a caster, Hulk's a barbarian, Thor's the Paladin and Captain America is the fighter-tank bred. Now granted, you could easily argue Hulk, Captain and Thor all could fall under each others' roles, but the rest are set in stone.
 

Alar

The Stormbringer
Dec 1, 2009
1,356
0
0
thaluikhain said:
remnant_phoenix said:
I haven't seen the movie yet, but I've always been a Hawkeye fan. He was my favorite character to play as in the old "Captain America and the Avengers" beat-em-up and I've always liked the characters who excel because of gadgets/finely-tuned skills/intellect, rather than just superpowers.

I mean, this is what Batman does, and when discussing the Justice League, no one calls Batman "a lame wanna-be superhero who is just a regular guy with gadgets and superbly-trained skills who pales in comparison to powerhouses like Superman and the Green Lantern."

The only concrete difference is that Batman has a widespread, devoted fan-base while Hawkeye is a much more obscure character, therefore Hawkeye is easier to dismiss.
Erm. Batman doesn't have to revolve everything around an obsolete weapon that's his sole purpose for existing. He might write "bat" on everything he owns, but that's not the same as making everything an arrow.

Now, if he had a magic bow and arrows, fine, Thor has a magic hammer, whatever. As it is, it's just silly.
It isn't just 'a bow', though. It's a SHIELD designed super tech bow, and Hawkeye is the best in what he does. Someone says that he sounds more like an Olympic archer. You know what? Olympic archers don't shoot moving targets in the middle of a battlefield with precise aim and constant awareness of their surroundings.

As to people complaining Black Widow was useless, she was the one that actually proved capable of outfoxing Loki, the God of Tricksters and Deceit! Plus she managed to do a decent job of holding her own in the war with her specialized handgun and hand-to-hand skills.

Hawkeye and Black Widow are essentially the best-trained agents SHIELD has, aside from Nick Fury who runs the damn place.

And why are people complaining that Captain America is underpowered? He's the god-damn super soldier! He has increased strength, speed, agility, endurance, reflexes, pain endurance, and a ton of balls. Not to mention the indestructible shield that he can throw around better than any Olympian can throw a discus. He's probably even made of tougher stuff in general, considering his arms didn't shatter when Thor smacked his shield, and he was able to get up and walk off an alien blaster shot to the gut.
 

Aurgelmir

WAAAAGH!
Nov 11, 2009
1,566
0
0
DrgoFx said:
Alright...I need to get this out. Like many people, I saw the Avengers movie and like many people I thought it was awesome. My main problem right now is the community reaction to the characters. Yes, Ironman, Captain America, The Hulk and Thor are all the main focal points, Hawkeye and Black Widow being the two side projects that wandered in to complete the original team, but really. Black Widow has nothing but "Lolboobs" everywhere I go and Hawkeye is called lame for using a bow.

Let's get this straight. Hawkeye, a secret agent who has dead-accurate aim and could pinpoint an arrow to pierce through your clothing, skin, ribs and heart at the perfect angel to kill you instantly, is lame? What kind of thinking is that? Did we watch the same movie? The guy, with ONE FUCKING ARROW makes an explosion so large in the Shield aircraft's turbine that the whole thing was at risk to plummet. Not to mention, did you see him miss a shot during that last battle? The guy is smart as all fuck, too. He knew Loki would catch his arrow, so he shoots and explosive arrow to him and blows it in his face. Really, the mere thought of stating this guy is lame baffles. Even in Comparison to the other Avengers.
Only thing I find wrong with Hawkeye is the lack of a mask. Everyone else gets a pretty accurate costume, and Hawkeye just gets his colors (Well Thor lacks his helmet, I hate that too :p)

Besides I feel HawkEye and Black widow proved you don't need to have super powers to be useful.