I don't argue there are extreme social pressures on men as well, after all, sometimes men are called (disgustingly) "the disposable gender". There's a lot of competing, too, among other men. That's hard-wired, innit?JaredXE said://my post
I'm just going to have to argue on this point. Young men are constantly being taught that their self-worth is wrapped up in what they can provide to their mate and their kids. Men are expected to be chained to a desk until they drop dead. Men are expected to know and provide handyman skills around the home. The man is expected to respond to that mysterious noise in the middle of the night. We have to prove our worth with the best jobs possible to earn as much money as we can no matter the stress on ourselves because that's all we're good for.
And we have to do it with stoic determination. Can't complain, can't show emotions, can't let the stress show because that's unmanly and no one likes an unmanly man. Especially women.
To top it all off then we relax at home, turn on some prime-time tv and witness sitcoms and programs denegrating men and husbands by portraying them as infantile and ineffectual while their brilliant and exceptional wives show them up and critisize them every episode.
Not to say that there isn't a fair amount of social pressure on women, I know there is. But don't just assume that men are raised to be without responsiblities and think of themselves first.
I hesitate to say this because it's based on anecdotal evidence, personal experience, and "general impression", but it seems much easier for a man to lose himself in academia or a high-stakes, long-hours career while simultaneously being a father and husband (however nominally), than for a woman to do the same. (Extremely time-consuming, intensive career and motherhood, not fatherhood obv. Heh.) I'm not saying it's impossible or it doesn't happen, just that it is less likely, and point to most any political body or executive board meeting to support this statement. Some conscious or unconscious force must account for that - I'm willing to entertain that to some extent it might be personal preference for a woman to forgo other avenues of interest and enrichment to raise children or care for family. It might even be more nature than nurture, but I'm not entirely convinced. From my own experience, the different ways I've seen females and males (friends/family) respond to births or family illnesses to even things like finally scrubbing the splash zone around the toilet, women are not any more eager to take time out to do the necessary things, they're just more willing and that is perceived as their sphere of responsibility. While simultaneously also working full-time like their male, and having just as many other obligations. (I realize this is all anecdotal. I apologize.)
I'm not trying to point fingers at anyone. Not men, not women, we're all complicit to some extent and we're all ... I hesitate to say victims, but we're all influenced?
You make an excellent point about the expectations placed on men, and of course the reality is never as cut and dried as an internet discussion that necessitates broad language and generalization. I would argue that there's a difference between occasionally heading downstairs to check for burglars and spending your day at work, then coming home and doing the stupid day-to-day stuff that must be done, but of course the former is not selfish and the latter not entirely selfless.
"And we have to do it with stoic determination. Can't complain, can't show emotions, can't let the stress show because that's unmanly and no one likes an unmanly man. Especially women."
I'll just reiterate, though someone has responded - this is not true. To me, one of the greatest tragedies of the cult of masculinity is this enforced idea of emotionlessness fostered by and among men. My boyfriend tells me his fears, he cries, and he wouldn't dare do that in front of his male friends or his father or brother, for example. I don't think any less of him. I think more of him, because he's not maintaining a ridiculous mask and is being genuine. And, of course, it's a sign of trust that I hold very dear, but it would be easier for him if he had more emotional outlets.
Thank you for your reply, and you make excellent points. In an ideal world we'd all just get on with loving each other and we'd all be free to choose our roles free from preconceptions or external influences, and I agree that there are forces at work on both sides.