I stumbled across this information, while joyfully reading about the GW2 RvR that I am looking forward too. But sadly, my day got a hell of a lot more depressing.
Here is a link:
http://kotaku.com/5886674/bioware-writer-describes-her-gaming-tastes-angry-gamers-call-her-a-cancer
Allright, so besides people calling her a cancer, I kept browsing, and apparantly people are also very annoyed at her writing a homosexual plotline for the male Sheperd. Because of this she is a cancer on the gaming community.
I am gay, and this digital throwing of feces has to stop. Now.
I do not feel any need for Shepard to have any sexual relations in the way it has been interpreted in the Mass Effect games - because relationships, while a part of a character, is not the most defining thing about them. Would Zaeed, Tali or Jacob act any different than they already did because of their sexuality? No, because BioWare spends lots and lots of writing on telling the story of the characters, describing defining moments in their lives, what motivates them, and what made them who they are. The stories of the companions are almost always completely unrelated to sex, and are more focused on personal religious, ethical and/or political ideas, than what makes their genitals move. Sexuality IS important, but it is NOT the deciding factor in shaping these characters - BioWare have never made it so.
While I must admit the relationship with Liara passed on through ME1, ME2 and Shadow Broker DLC, is the best shot at an romance I have seen in a game yet, simply because it actually was a relationship depicted across two games, many other romances simply feels like being put in the game for fan service, or for the sheer sake of option. Be it straight or homo relationships.
While I as a gay man appreciate the fact, that video games wants to explore homosexuality in the storylines, I find it a bit weird, that it is going to happen while Reapers are eating the people of the earth. I would actually think the "gay option" would have had a lot more integrity in Mass Effect 1 or 2, where the series wasn't so close to climax, and the "deadline" for the Reaper invasion was less imminent. I do not know the detailed storyline for Mass Effect 3, but it seems a bit less relevant to rub spacesuits against each other, when your homeplanet is burning to a crisp.
My whole point is, that I do think that RPG's should embrace sexuality, but the setting for it should just be right. Sexuality IS important for any human (or Alien??) being, but I honestly think it deserves integrity, rather than simple presence just for the sake of presence.
The consequence of "forcing" it upon an already developed character like the Male Sheperd, that hasn't hinted at being homosexual at all during the series, is also damaging towards the label "homoseuxal", as it intrudes on the subjective perception of a loved character for many. The result is a lot of slander and hate speech towards homosexuality, simply because it ruins the character for many - and I understand the reluctance in people, when something cherished is changed. But it also irritates me enourmously to read line after line of "butt XXX" jokes, and all other kinds of prejudistic crap, this reactions creates.
Male Sheperd will have homosexual options in ME3. The game is too close to release now to remove it, and hopefully a well written story and a fun game will overshadow these parts of the game. But we as a gaming community could teach the developers, that if we want romances they should have integrity and meaning - not just be "around".
Sexuality, be it homo or hetero, deserves respect, and I don't feel like its being treated like that, when the world is about to blow up around you. Then it just becomes nuisance that ruins immersion.
Here is a link:
http://kotaku.com/5886674/bioware-writer-describes-her-gaming-tastes-angry-gamers-call-her-a-cancer
Allright, so besides people calling her a cancer, I kept browsing, and apparantly people are also very annoyed at her writing a homosexual plotline for the male Sheperd. Because of this she is a cancer on the gaming community.
I am gay, and this digital throwing of feces has to stop. Now.
I do not feel any need for Shepard to have any sexual relations in the way it has been interpreted in the Mass Effect games - because relationships, while a part of a character, is not the most defining thing about them. Would Zaeed, Tali or Jacob act any different than they already did because of their sexuality? No, because BioWare spends lots and lots of writing on telling the story of the characters, describing defining moments in their lives, what motivates them, and what made them who they are. The stories of the companions are almost always completely unrelated to sex, and are more focused on personal religious, ethical and/or political ideas, than what makes their genitals move. Sexuality IS important, but it is NOT the deciding factor in shaping these characters - BioWare have never made it so.
While I must admit the relationship with Liara passed on through ME1, ME2 and Shadow Broker DLC, is the best shot at an romance I have seen in a game yet, simply because it actually was a relationship depicted across two games, many other romances simply feels like being put in the game for fan service, or for the sheer sake of option. Be it straight or homo relationships.
While I as a gay man appreciate the fact, that video games wants to explore homosexuality in the storylines, I find it a bit weird, that it is going to happen while Reapers are eating the people of the earth. I would actually think the "gay option" would have had a lot more integrity in Mass Effect 1 or 2, where the series wasn't so close to climax, and the "deadline" for the Reaper invasion was less imminent. I do not know the detailed storyline for Mass Effect 3, but it seems a bit less relevant to rub spacesuits against each other, when your homeplanet is burning to a crisp.
My whole point is, that I do think that RPG's should embrace sexuality, but the setting for it should just be right. Sexuality IS important for any human (or Alien??) being, but I honestly think it deserves integrity, rather than simple presence just for the sake of presence.
The consequence of "forcing" it upon an already developed character like the Male Sheperd, that hasn't hinted at being homosexual at all during the series, is also damaging towards the label "homoseuxal", as it intrudes on the subjective perception of a loved character for many. The result is a lot of slander and hate speech towards homosexuality, simply because it ruins the character for many - and I understand the reluctance in people, when something cherished is changed. But it also irritates me enourmously to read line after line of "butt XXX" jokes, and all other kinds of prejudistic crap, this reactions creates.
Male Sheperd will have homosexual options in ME3. The game is too close to release now to remove it, and hopefully a well written story and a fun game will overshadow these parts of the game. But we as a gaming community could teach the developers, that if we want romances they should have integrity and meaning - not just be "around".
Sexuality, be it homo or hetero, deserves respect, and I don't feel like its being treated like that, when the world is about to blow up around you. Then it just becomes nuisance that ruins immersion.