The Playstation Loses.. To the Playstation

Recommended Videos

Ben Legend

New member
Apr 16, 2009
1,549
0
0
I think it owuld have been wise for the OP to have said "Flame on"

But yeah, I have a 360 and Wii, and still think, despite the next generation consoles, its still good to occasionally play on the PS2
 

branalvere

New member
May 18, 2009
47
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
Microsoft shouldn't be too happy either, the figures aren't there but the 360's April sales were only three thousand or so more than the PS2.

Xbox 360 -175,00
PlayStation 2 - 172,00
Playstation 3 - 127,000
Source: http://www.gamestooge.com/2009/05/14/npd-console-sales-for-april-2009/

That's completely pathetic for both parties, when your console is barely competing with a 10year old system you really need to rethink the strategy. Neither Microsoft nor Sony can be particularly pleased with sales figures like that.
You neglected to mention that wii has shifted 340k units in the same month. Thats a victory on the scale of Norway in the eurovision song contest....
 

Altorin

Jack of No Trades
May 16, 2008
6,976
0
0
Darkrai said:
paiged said:
Ouch, that's harsh. The ps2 is a good system, though. Can't really argue that fact. And it's more than affordable now.

What is more shocking is that people are out buying DSis...really?
Nothing wrong with the DSi. I have all three DS's and I'm loving my DSi the most
I don't have one, but if you want to play DS games (and only DS games), there's no reason not to appreciate the DSi.. If you have a GBA or an old DS, and you don't trade it in for credit towards a DSi, then you don't lose anything by using a DSi for your DS games and a GBA/DS for your GBA games.
 

Russian_Assassin

New member
Apr 24, 2008
1,849
0
0
Man the PS3 really is a big phat phailure... Too expensive (for someone who has no bloody income, so stop trying to say that 400 euros is reasonable), not many games (although there are some decent games that were recently released) and no backwards compatibility... Well, about that last thing, I finally found a way to fix backwards compatibility! It's really easy actually:
1.Go to any shop that sells games and consoles
2.Buy a Play station 2
3.Buy some duct tape
4.Use it to stick the ps2 on the ps3
(if you already have ps2 and tape you can skip the steps 2 and 3)
Here! Problem solved!
 

Jumplion

New member
Mar 10, 2008
7,873
0
0
Khazoth said:
Godofgame67 said:
Khazoth said:
I hope the PS3 gets bad enough to lose InFamous as an exclusive.

...Want...
I hope it gets bad enough to lose God of War 3 as an exclusive.
Why? Wasn't one God Of War enough? I liked the First but the second one was the same exact game. We didn't need two, much less three.

Pendragon9 said:
I'm hearing alot of people on this thread say they want the PS3 to lose it's exclusives.

Whatever happened to it not having good exclusives anyway? You fanboys are so hypocritical.
InFamous is as good as it gets. What else does it have, seriously?

God of War 3 (Recycled Game)

Metal Gear Solid 4 (Boring game, bad story. For the record I didn't play the first two Metal Gear Solids, but I played the third one and the story was.. decent, but the game was terrible.)

Final Fantasy (Overall atrocious)

Killzone 2 (Hell, I remember that the original Killzone on my PS2 was basicly a Sci-Fi mish-mash of the Iraq War and WW2. I remember this city that eerily reminded me of Baghdad and another mission set with pillboxes and trenches with barbed wire that reminded me of D-Day. There wasn't a story I could remember, and the game felt clunky and mishandled. )

Besides InFamous the playstation 3 doesn't have a strong catalog.
That's a problem with alot of people listing PS3 exclusives, they list games that they personally don't care about as if they are inferior instead of using a consensus of everyone's opinion on how good the actual game is. It does not matter what you personally think of the game, the fact is that the PS3 has exclusives but everyone is just too blinded by 2006 stereotypes to notice.

InFamous, Killzone 2, and MGS4 have all had positive reviews overall, and they are PS3 exclusives (two of which have no possibility of going to any other console, I'll let you find out which and why) not to mention LBP, Warhawk, Uncharted, ect... have also gotten generally positive reviews. The PS3 has some god damn exclusives, but you guys always mix your own personal opinion on the games with the overall amount of it which is has plenty.

And do not get me started on the HYPOCRISY of some 360 owners where they yell out "The PS3 has no [good] games!" and they they ***** and moan and whine for "OMG MGS4 ON 360!$!$"

Ever since FFXIII went multiplat, absolutely everyone expects every god damn PS3 exclusive to go over to 360 or whatever even when the game is freakin' owned by Sony like InFAmous, Fat Princess, MAG, Ratchet and Clank, Team ICO, Uncharted, and God of War are!

Here's a solution to your whining, buy a fucking PS3. No. Stop. I do NOT want to hear about how "it's too expensive!" or whatever crap. That is the only option you have until MGS4 or InFamous do come to 360 however doubtful it is. Stop complaining and save up your money.

Sorry if I seem overly pissed off, but I see this time and time again and it just frustrates me. I hardly ever see any PS3 owners whine or beg for Bioshock and even when it came over we said "yay" and moved on.

[/rant]
 

Datsle

New member
Feb 4, 2009
187
0
0
Hey, who's getting pissy? Nintendo have pulled off the greatest interactive media coup in history, by throwing away the "more power" "better graphics" dynamic of every previous generation of console war and doing something completely different. Hats off to them. They had their traditional territory stolen by Sony in the last gen and did something new - and it worked.

It is ironic that the quicker, faster, most powerful console is at the bottom of the next gen pile, isn't it? Proof that it's games not specs that sell consoles....
Im sorry for that-
i think my vision's getting blurred by all the hate in this thread,
Instantly thought you would say

Nintendolol GRaphix sux, Playstation is better, you'r poor loolol. (Or xbox, if you want.)


You say that like you aren't going to go back on that choice within a year and a half.
And yes, i love the playstation 2, and i would probably get a ps3 if it had backwards comp. and were cheaper. Unless it does that, i won't be getting it.
 

BolognaBaloney

New member
Mar 17, 2009
2,672
0
0
Mazty said:
Khazoth said:
So, apparently the Playstation 3 has dropped way behind the Xbox 360, Wii, and even the Playstation 2.

Anyways, I thought that was good for a laugh, I mean losing a console war is no shame, but losing the console war to the system you are trying to replace.. Wow.


Source: http://videogames.yahoo.com/events/plugged-in/ps3-bested-by-older-brother/1315218
http://vgchartz.com/hwlaunch.php

Yeah, thing is, the PS3 is still selling better than the 360 in comparison to release dates.
I think that's the figure that's important and the media chooses to ignore, as there isn't a hype-making story behind it. Either way, the PS3 is hardly loosing any war.
Don't kid yourself boy, the ps3 is not even close to the 360 in terms of sales.
 

suhlEap

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,044
0
0
haha fail. i think the ps2 is still worthy of purchase though. i've been meaning to get one again for some time (my last one broke) and it has some awesome games on it. the ps3 is still kinda expensive, and might not go up again til in decreases in price?
 

Booze Zombie

New member
Dec 8, 2007
7,416
0
0
Isn't this like man upgrading to guns only to realise the bow and arrow is still more effective?

"These marshmallow bullets were trouble from day one."
 

damselgaming

New member
Feb 3, 2009
924
0
0
Just to cheer up the PS3 owners like myself, who are sick of all this bickering, we are finally getting Fallout 3 content- hooray!
Also, can people please get anough of life to stop complaining about who's damn console is better. I would happily own all of them if I had the money. I wish children would stop whinging about it, that's what makes it tiresome.
Also, I swear the 360 is pretty much getting Infamous in the form of Prototype? I could be mistaken.
 

Rii Mitsukai

New member
Sep 25, 2007
40
0
0
Godofgame67 said:
Khazoth said:
I hope the PS3 gets bad enough to lose InFamous as an exclusive.

...Want...
I hope it gets bad enough to lose God of War 3 as an exclusive.
the problem is it wont lose god of war 3 as an exclusive because its developed and published by sony themselves
 

IsoNeko

New member
Oct 6, 2008
457
0
0
Indigo_Dingo said:
Zeeky_Santos said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
Zeeky_Santos said:
Abedeus said:
Zeeky_Santos said:
Indigo_Dingo said:
*Poorly researched fanboyism*
like i said, Tin of worms. i am not touching this again, its just stupid arguing with you. i give you cold hard fact about hardware and you still think that an average (but worse than some of the others you can get on PC) graphics card strapped to a console is better. You are clearly trapped in a massive ego if you honestly think that there is any stystem known to man that is better than 12gb 2000mhz of ram stuck of a highend x58 chipset mobo with 2 GTX 295s on it.

tin of worms man, i know that there is some sort of absurd thing that you are gonna try to throw at me, but i won't be listening. you clearly aren't. Tin. Of. Worms.
It took you that long to see that Indigo is the biggest PS3 fanboy on the Escapist?
Nah, i knew since my first encounter with him. i think it was in the news room, but i am not sure of the incentive. oh well. lets just see how many decades it takes before he realises that the ability to upgrade is a good thing. or the ability to do photoshop on the same machine (my point about the interface and what not) is freaking awesome. or the fact that a large amount of games on the one maching gives everyone a choice of what game they think is best (my point about the large gamebase of pc that he clearly did not want to accept)
A larghe amount of games doesn't mean they're good, just that there is a lot of them, with hundreds upon hundreds of simply awful ones.

The ability to upgrade might be a good thing, except for the fact that it is a prolonged cost that means the console ends up costing some $2500 in the space of time my $400 Ps3 will last me. And you're still not adressing the fact that the results say the ps3 is clearly as good, and the developers say its better.
Like I said. TIN. OF. WORMS.
If thats your way of saying you spoke hastily, and feel you were incorrect, then ok, we're fine
No, I believe that's his way of saying "Best or better is subjective."

However, unless it came from a mouth of a Sony employee receiving money hand over fist. I have a feeling you wouldn't care?
 

BolognaBaloney

New member
Mar 17, 2009
2,672
0
0
Mazty said:
BolognaBaloney said:
Mazty said:
Khazoth said:
So, apparently the Playstation 3 has dropped way behind the Xbox 360, Wii, and even the Playstation 2.

Anyways, I thought that was good for a laugh, I mean losing a console war is no shame, but losing the console war to the system you are trying to replace.. Wow.


Source: http://videogames.yahoo.com/events/plugged-in/ps3-bested-by-older-brother/1315218
http://vgchartz.com/hwlaunch.php

Yeah, thing is, the PS3 is still selling better than the 360 in comparison to release dates.
I think that's the figure that's important and the media chooses to ignore, as there isn't a hype-making story behind it. Either way, the PS3 is hardly loosing any war.
Don't kid yourself boy, the ps3 is not even close to the 360 in terms of sales.
Ha, boy?
First of all, you clearly need to brush up on your maths and grammar.
Secondly, how can you say that when the PS3 has sold more in RELATIVE sales, considering the 360 had a year headstart.
Don't kid yourself, look at the facts, and leave your ignorance and rudeness for youtube.
And now the ignorant speaks of ignorance, congrats.
Speaking of math, want to explain how a the ps3 is behind by a mere 7 million consoles?
 

bad rider

The prodigal son of a goat boy
Dec 23, 2007
2,252
0
0
fix-the-spade said:
Microsoft shouldn't be too happy either, the figures aren't there but the 360's April sales were only three thousand or so more than the PS2.

Xbox 360 -175,00
PlayStation 2 - 172,00
Playstation 3 - 127,000
Source: http://www.gamestooge.com/2009/05/14/npd-console-sales-for-april-2009/

That's completely pathetic for both parties, when your console is barely competing with a 10year old system you really need to rethink the strategy. Neither Microsoft nor Sony can be particularly pleased with sales figures like that.
Don't look too much into this. It's a spike consoles have them every time a new title, piece of hardware or killer app comes out. The PS2 spiked due to a price cut and beat the next gen console with the lowest sales. Nintendo wasn't worried when halo 3 came out and MS took the top of the sales chart.

Source = http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/49529
No doubt spurred by Halo 3's launch, the 360 sold the most out of any hardware platform, with its 528,000 systems nearly doubling sales from a month prior. But even the Wii's second place at 501,000 consoles sold set a record for the platform, surpassing even the Wii's launch month in the states. Sony's systems took the last two spots in home console sales, with the PlayStation 2's 215,000 and the PlayStation 3's 119,000 units.
 

RollForInitiative

New member
Mar 10, 2009
1,015
0
0
I'll freely admit that I still buy games for the PS2 more frequently than I buy games for the PS3. The PS3 exclusive titles haven't really interested me and I purchase the 360 version of anything multiplatform.

Edit: Actually, I think I've played as many PS1 games on my PS3 as I have played PS3 games.