That is awesome. Im gonna look this upo on Youtube... as its alot more interesting than this thread...DoPo said:Would some murder cheer you up?
![]()
That is awesome. Im gonna look this upo on Youtube... as its alot more interesting than this thread...DoPo said:Would some murder cheer you up?
![]()
Welcome to the Escapist : DJaiko said:Okay! This will be my very first post on the forums of the escapist so I figured why not start it off on a (controversial) topic that always just... Grates on my nerves.
This is how you introduce yourself to the Escapist? -.-*the rest of the post*
First off...Jaiko said:Okay! This will be my very first post on the forums of the escapist so I figured why not start it off on a (controversial) topic that always just... Grates on my nerves.
I wish that people would grow up about sexism! The views that many women, and even many men have are just mind mindbogglingly painful!
Now hear me out, I understand the massive spur from women that have been demanding equality with men. To be completely honest I agree with the demands that a woman needs to be allowed to do what ever a guy can do, and that they shouldn't be judged based on gender.
As much as I love the idea for women to get all the equal rights that men have, this is were the problem is as well. Most women I know of will claim that they do not want to be discriminated against because they are a women, but will then hide behind their female label when something they don't want comes up. A great example of this is something that happened many times at my job, Often the girls that I work with would ask me to get something off the top shelves for them because they are a girl and I'm a guy. I know for a fact that if I saw the same girl trying to get something and I said, "Let me get that for you, I'm a guy after all" she would cry sexism on me.
What gets me even more frustrated though is any person, man or women, who will cry for equality, but then will cry sexism if a man punches a woman. If an attack was based on the fact that the target was a woman, then yes it was sexist. However if a woman is being a prick, or outright attacking someone, I think a person should throw a punch just the same way they would if the person was a man... Assuming the person would punch a man. Claiming that a person shouldn't punch a girl for no reason more than she is a girl, is just as sexist as refusing them something they want because they are a girl.
Well that's my rant for now, Discuss please!
I'll save you the trouble - here is the video:WanderingFool said:That is awesome. Im gonna look this upo on Youtube... as its alot more interesting than this thread...DoPo said:Would some murder cheer you up?
![]()
I think this sums up my reply really well. I have had women ask me for help more times than I can count for things they could really do themselves but are just to lazy to do. I have also noticed that women always get preference on relaxing jobs. I used to work in as a IT assistant and the second any physical labor came up and a woman didn't want to do it I would have to drop my job to go do hers and 90% of the time it wasn't cause it was to heavy they just didn't want to and would claim it is to difficult without even attempting.axlryder said:To the OP's point, and I can't disagree with him that this is an issue that does exist (though his example is dumb). At my job, whenever there is something slightly heavy to be lifted, I'm called upon. Not because the woman I work with are incapable of lifting it (they aren't). It's not because I'm particularly strong (I'm 5'7", 140 pounds, and my strength is merely above average for my size, but I have thin forearms so I actually appear pretty frail). They're also all aware I have a bad joint condition as well, so lifting heavy things puts more strain on my joints than a normal person. Despite that, they still call on me, because I'm a man. It's the same thing with going up on the ladder in the stock room. I know there are woman there capable of climbing ladders and hauling record documents, but I'm still always the one who does it. Hell, there are woman there who are taller than I am. It would make more sense for them to do it. Anyway, even if I flat out refused, I know that they would think less of me because of it, even though I'm no more obligated to do that work than the rest of them. Yet, quite hypocritically, any time some benefit is rendered upon the guys at my workplace, the woman cry sexism, despite they themselves clearly receiving treatment that could be deemed preferential. For instance, the woman are always given first pick to go home early when we're slow if they want to, and granted that request if they ask, whereas the guys are hardly ever granted permission to do so. No, I'm not skewing this situation or lying. This is straight up how it is. I genuinely like most of my co-workers (male and female), and it's not even that big of a deal to me, but it is bullshit.
That said, this really has been done to death. And even if I agree that the issue is there, I don't think this is "the real problem" with sexism. Considering my old co-worker was just recently messaging me about how the assholes at her new job are sending her dirty texts and touching her inappropriately, and HR doesn't seem to give much of a fuck, I'd say there are a lot of other very serious issues with sexism.
First off, allow me to stand out and welcome you to the forums *glares at everyone else*.Jaiko said:Snipity snip snip
Well done completely misrepresenting what feminism is (ironically about as bad as most feminazis do). To make a long, complex issue short:aba1 said:I think this sums up my reply really well. I have had women ask me for help more times than I can count for things they could really do themselves but are just to lazy to do. I have also noticed that women always get preference on relaxing jobs. I used to work in as a IT assistant and the second any physical labor came up and a woman didn't want to do it I would have to drop my job to go do hers and 90% of the time it wasn't cause it was to heavy they just didn't want to and would claim it is to difficult without even attempting.axlryder said:To the OP's point, and I can't disagree with him that this is an issue that does exist (though his example is dumb). At my job, whenever there is something slightly heavy to be lifted, I'm called upon. Not because the woman I work with are incapable of lifting it (they aren't). It's not because I'm particularly strong (I'm 5'7", 140 pounds, and my strength is merely above average for my size, but I have thin forearms so I actually appear pretty frail). They're also all aware I have a bad joint condition as well, so lifting heavy things puts more strain on my joints than a normal person. Despite that, they still call on me, because I'm a man. It's the same thing with going up on the ladder in the stock room. I know there are woman there capable of climbing ladders and hauling record documents, but I'm still always the one who does it. Hell, there are woman there who are taller than I am. It would make more sense for them to do it. Anyway, even if I flat out refused, I know that they would think less of me because of it, even though I'm no more obligated to do that work than the rest of them. Yet, quite hypocritically, any time some benefit is rendered upon the guys at my workplace, the woman cry sexism, despite they themselves clearly receiving treatment that could be deemed preferential. For instance, the woman are always given first pick to go home early when we're slow if they want to, and granted that request if they ask, whereas the guys are hardly ever granted permission to do so. No, I'm not skewing this situation or lying. This is straight up how it is. I genuinely like most of my co-workers (male and female), and it's not even that big of a deal to me, but it is bullshit.
That said, this really has been done to death. And even if I agree that the issue is there, I don't think this is "the real problem" with sexism. Considering my old co-worker was just recently messaging me about how the assholes at her new job are sending her dirty texts and touching her inappropriately, and HR doesn't seem to give much of a fuck, I'd say there are a lot of other very serious issues with sexism.
But ya this topic has been done to death as others have said this is the sorta things where threads about sexism towards guys tend to spawn from.
I think an example involving the lids of pickle jars would have been much more effective. Sometimes sexism isn't really a bad thing, it just works to outline the differences that do (like biologically) exists between the average man and woman (this excludes any females who've had extensive training in jar-opening).Jaiko said:Often the girls that I work with would ask me to get something off the top shelves for them because they are a girl and I'm a guy.
Um... are you taller than they are? In that case, it isn't your male-ness, it's your height that causes them to ask you to get things off the top shelf.Jaiko said:Often the girls that I work with would ask me to get something off the top shelves for them because they are a girl and I'm a guy. I know for a fact that if I saw the same girl trying to get something and I said, "Let me get that for you, I'm a guy after all" she would cry sexism on me.
Well, that's a sticker issue. Men often find punching one another to be an agreeable way to resolve differences. However, because women are physically weaker on average than men, punching has often been used as an intimidation technique by men because the women in question can't punch back effectively.Jaiko said:What gets me even more frustrated though is any person, man or women, who will cry for equality, but then will cry sexism if a man punches a woman. If an attack was based on the fact that the target was a woman, then yes it was sexist. However if a woman is being a prick, or outright attacking someone, I think a person should throw a punch just the same way they would if the person was a man... Assuming the person would punch a man. Claiming that a person shouldn't punch a girl for no reason more than she is a girl, is just as sexist as refusing them something they want because they are a girl.
Sorry but I think women deserve a little credit they are not so weak they cannot lift a few boxes that weigh less than 5 pounds over a couple feet. Everything I said was from personal experience in things that have happened to me. I mean I am not ridiculous and if a slight person needed help with a few 20 pound boxes I would not judge them or not help them. If something is decently heavy I get it, it might be a bit much that's cool I don't mind helping out but at the same time if you can do something yourself you really should.Undeadpool said:Well done completely misrepresenting what feminism is (ironically about as bad as most feminazis do). To make a long, complex issue short:aba1 said:I think this sums up my reply really well. I have had women ask me for help more times than I can count for things they could really do themselves but are just to lazy to do. I have also noticed that women always get preference on relaxing jobs. I used to work in as a IT assistant and the second any physical labor came up and a woman didn't want to do it I would have to drop my job to go do hers and 90% of the time it wasn't cause it was to heavy they just didn't want to and would claim it is to difficult without even attempting.axlryder said:snip
But ya this topic has been done to death as others have said this is the sorta things where threads about sexism towards guys tend to spawn from.
Misrepresenting feminism: WOMEN THINK THEY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO DO EVERYTHING MEN DO, EVEN OUTSIDE THEIR BIOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS!! (in this case: muscle mass)
Actual feminism: Women make excellent soldiers (and superior snipers) due to their increased tolerance for muscle pain and discomfort (among other reasons), they should be allowed to join the armed forces.
We're not saying this is what feminism is supposed to represent. Literally neither of us even mentioned feminism or alluded to feminism. Only the OP did that. The closest we came to that is me saying "to the OPs point", which is a flimsy basis for such a rebuttal. I was establishing that there is a double standard in play here. It's also establishing that people in our workplaces are making biological assumption and allocating workloads simply based on generalizations about gender that aren't even applicable here, which is sexist. We even explicitly pointed out that it's not outside their biological limitations, and in my case likely less outside theirs than mine in the long run.Undeadpool said:Well done completely misrepresenting what feminism is (ironically about as bad as most feminazis do). To make a long, complex issue short:aba1 said:I think this sums up my reply really well. I have had women ask me for help more times than I can count for things they could really do themselves but are just to lazy to do. I have also noticed that women always get preference on relaxing jobs. I used to work in as a IT assistant and the second any physical labor came up and a woman didn't want to do it I would have to drop my job to go do hers and 90% of the time it wasn't cause it was to heavy they just didn't want to and would claim it is to difficult without even attempting.
But ya this topic has been done to death as others have said this is the sorta things where threads about sexism towards guys tend to spawn from.
Misrepresenting feminism: WOMEN THINK THEY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO DO EVERYTHING MEN DO, EVEN OUTSIDE THEIR BIOLOGICAL LIMITATIONS!! (in this case: muscle mass)
Actual feminism: Women make excellent soldiers (and superior snipers) due to their increased tolerance for muscle pain and discomfort (among other reasons), they should be allowed to join the armed forces.
And I'm a woman and there have been many times when a guy has had trouble with some physical work, and declined my help. Or worse, pushed in and taken over because I'm a frail woman.aba1 said:I have had women ask me for help more times than I can count for things they could really do themselves but are just to lazy to do. I have also noticed that women always get preference on relaxing jobs. I used to work in as a IT assistant and the second any physical labor came up and a woman didn't want to do it I would have to drop my job to go do hers and 90% of the time it wasn't cause it was to heavy they just didn't want to and would claim it is to difficult without even attempting.
Why? Was she saying that she herself wanted to fight on the front lines, or felt that she could? Just because she wants women to be given the same opportunity to, doesn't mean that she wants it for herself.barbzilla said:I had a female friend who was "discussing" equality in battle with me at a bar when a fight broke out, telling me how women are just as capable fighters are men. A short hour later a fight broke out in the bar (the fight had nothing to do with us, and was unlikely to effect us at all) and her first reaction is to hide behind me.
Now I have no problems with a woman hiding behind me, but it makes her previous point seem invalid. If someone is going to have a conviction, they need to stand behind it. This is similar to someone harping on recycling and the fact that not enough people recycle their plastics that end up in landfills, then five minutes later you see them throw their soda bottle into a trash can. It is hypocrisy and you know it.