They could put two points before you even start the game which say "this game features offensive content, do you want it filtered?" after giving you the choice to not download the offensive content in the first place, and people have been proven to still object to it.By making nudity something that each consumer must choose to display, however, EA deftly sidesteps the issue.
...it's set around a French burlesque house. Burlesque isn't, despite what the article would have us believe, French for "pastry house"...letsnoobtehpwns said:I'm starting to have bad feelings about this game. It's never good when a game uses breasts as a selling point.
Oh wow. Someone is thinking out side the box. Not too burst your bubble or anything.Altorin said:Is EA Marketing DLC for one game, to virally market their other game, Dante's Inferno? This could definitely be Lust.
how is it like that at all?breadlord said:I don't believe that two departments of EA will merge to sell the game as a whole company. That's like Microsoft making games for the PS3.Altorin said:Is EA Marketing DLC for one game, to virally market their other game, Dante's Inferno? This could definitely be Lust.
you have obviously never watched two pints of lager and a packet of crisps then.Amnestic said:I can see how having your nipples being covered up by these [http://www.properpasty.co.uk/wp-content/themes/church_10/images/Steak-Pasty.jpg] would be quite distressing.
The difference between these two is the hot coffee mod was already part of the code on the GTA:SA disc, anybody with the knowhow could alter the code to implement it without any downloads.* With Saboteur, the actual nudity is not included in the game, for nipples you actually need to download the code. I don't know the ESRB's stance on DLC, but good odds EA makes an effort to cover their ass on this, either throwing a disclaimer with the DLC, or even have the ESRB throw in their two cents.Doug said:I strongly disagree. GTA: SA didn't even give the option of launching the Hot Coffee content, and it required an external modification of the game to achieve, and yet they still got utterly hammered by the ban-happy folks and the people who think parents can't look after their own kids....well, in America anyways. I believe the BBFC's response can be summed up with a shrug and a 'meh'.Greg Tito said:By making nudity something that each consumer must choose to display, however, EA deftly sidesteps the issue. Ostensibly, anyone who is able to purchase games and downloadable content from XBLA or PSN is old enough to have a credit card and therefore old enough to decide if they want to see virtual boobs. Of course, that still doesn't prevent some parent crying foul because they never set up parental controls or let their kids have their credit card number. In any case, it is a clever attempt by EA to offer adult content if you jump through an "age gate."
And I have to agree with Mr. Pitts here. This is DLC that could very well have just been on the website with a hefty price tag, and it still would have been cool with me on EA's part. But including it with legit copies is an interesting pseudo-DRM. I look forward to listening to parent's groups and FOX cry about this, because for once, EA's hands are clean.**Russ Pitts said:This ... is GENIUS!