SaneAmongInsane said:
Lets see, do I trust the guy thats been fired and is spewing vemnom on twitter who hasn't been well for months, but someone who's work I've enjoyed or do I trust the company that I have just learned is all about trying to go "mainstream" for ad dollars (from Amazing Atheist video, and given his tone in it I have no reason not to believe it) that write a B.S. release statement, does clearly state what homeboy did wrong, who's own employees antagonized someone who's clearly not well.
>.> Like I said earlier, When the escapist had it's falling out Extra Credits they did write us all a detailed letter explaining their side of the situation right or wrong. CA isn't doing that. And seeing as how the whole entertainer/fan dynamic is based upon the foundation of trust, it's not making me their biggest fans in the world right now.
the spoony situation is a lot more personal and would likely be an even bigger breach of trust, were has extra credits was more a financial matter. but beyond that your still showing your determined to hate channel awesome side, spoony never said anything like they didn't offer help in private your making the assumption that their wasn't anything like that (despite evidence they were in private talks over something) then openly stating that's your reason for hating them, not being unsure or even skeptical, in your post you directly asserted they didn't.
runic knight said:
I do have to wonder. Seems it was used in some argument with lupa, from what people here have been bringing up, and that argument lead to the reaction. But Maybe that is just speculation after all. I don't know much about it I admit.
I imagine it was mentioned in private, and the cause for some of the animosity after all there are some differences between it done in his reviews (were it's suppose to be a character and is usually done to show spoony, the character, as being something of a looser) and doing it on twitter were it's as him and the rape is the joke itself.
but I was just trying to point out that it wasn't directly or solely the cause of the incident or suspension like most people seem to assert.