I appear to have let frustration get the better of me, apologies for mis-interpreting your intentions the same way I have felt mine have been.JimB said:-snip-
My stance is fairly simple in that I've been getting the feeling (emotional response and all) that there are individuals who are telling people what they can and cannot do/say in regards to video-games and it was beginning to feel the same way in this thread. For comparison, I had a discussion with Spot on page 3/4 area and amended my viewpoint; I have been roundly maligned or accused of using poor logic with every subsequent response rather than addressing any perceived problems since then or my extant admission of oversight.
My initial outburst is not that 'everybody who wants greater representation doesn't play video games and is an sjw' but that there are a number of ill-informed people raising social issues with gaming who don't have the experience in the medium to form a well rounded opinion (I guess the best example would be campaigning to ban cinemas because of the Saw movies or Jack Thompson's career); I don't believe it's a huge number just a loud one and I don't want to hunt down names to name, though I am sure I could find some. But even my original response has since seen some hindsight that there are ill-informed people campaigning on the opposite side so in the interests of neutrality, I should keep to myself and 'vote with my wallet'.
And I'm primarily becoming frustrated because I don't disagree with what everyone else is asserting (that more representation is good) but I disagree with the overly aggressive and often off-hand manner in which they are responding to my concern (that the surge isn't exactly new, or a surge, and we're making too much of a song and dance over the increase in LGBT characters that somewhat removes the legitimacy of them even being included.)