So they made a gear pokemon, named it gear, and are using the word for "gear" in a language the people don't know so they won't "catch on"? You really aren't making a very good case for this :/ Unimaginative name is still unimaginativearc1991 said:Japanese don't use the word "Gear" so it's new for them ,they wont care.Grey_Focks said:This changes things....how? It's still a pokemon that looks like a gear, and it's named "Gear". It being the Japanese name doesn't make it any less un-imaginative.arc1991 said:They are not the English names! they are the Japanese names!Grey_Focks said:...Gear? Really? REALLY? I'm sorry pokemon, but you guys need to admit you've run out of ideas. the first two gen of games were great, and they had awesome design. Third had a few decent, fourth was pretty "blech" imo, and this....meh. I really haven't played a pokemon game since third gen (that was ruby and sapphire, right?) and I'm kinda glad I left when I did.
Just took another look at them, slightly more "in-depth"...and there's an ice-cream pokemon. Fuck it, why not.
That's its, time to edit my OP
Definitely. The polar bear ones are basically frosted versions of Teddiursa/Ursarang.retro himself said:Okay, what? Almost all of them are just repeats of old pokemon. I see machop, machoke and machamp there, paras, that coral pokemon, zubat, golbat, hitmonchan and hitmonlee (the two pokemons wearing GIS, what??), basucally all of them are just repeats. Please tell me you see it too.
If they actually had Pokemon fusion a-la Shin Megami Tensei, I'd probably buckle down and buy the game.Carboncrown said:It seems they discovered pokemon fusion.
"Pikachu is a combination of pikapika which is Japanese onomatopoeia for sparkle and chūchū which is the sound of squeaking."Grey_Focks said:"So they made a gear pokemon, named it gear, and are using the word for "gear" in a language the people don't know so they won't "catch on"? You really aren't making a very good case for this :/ Unimaginative name is still unimaginativearc1991 said:Japanese don't use the word "Gear" so it's new for them ,they wont care.Grey_Focks said:This changes things....how? It's still a pokemon that looks like a gear, and it's named "Gear". It being the Japanese name doesn't make it any less un-imaginative.arc1991 said:They are not the English names! they are the Japanese names!Grey_Focks said:...Gear? Really? REALLY? I'm sorry pokemon, but you guys need to admit you've run out of ideas. the first two gen of games were great, and they had awesome design. Third had a few decent, fourth was pretty "blech" imo, and this....meh. I really haven't played a pokemon game since third gen (that was ruby and sapphire, right?) and I'm kinda glad I left when I did.
Just took another look at them, slightly more "in-depth"...and there's an ice-cream pokemon. Fuck it, why not.
That's its, time to edit my OP
Please explain to me how Gear is in any way worse or significantly different from Magnemite. Floating magnet is fine, but somehow floating gear is crap?Thrashgrinder said:They All look shit.. i mean there is one pokemon who is just 2 gears. 2 gears man.
first of all i didnt say magnemite wasnt shit. and on my defense at least magnemite has an eye. this is just 2 gears with somethings on them.Leemaster777 said:Please explain to me how Gear is in any way worse or significantly different from Magnemite. Floating magnet is fine, but somehow floating gear is crap?Thrashgrinder said:They All look shit.. i mean there is one pokemon who is just 2 gears. 2 gears man.
Come on, I mean, magnets, how the fuck do they work?
No. The gears have eye's as well...Look again.Thrashgrinder said:first of all i didnt say magnemite wasnt shit. and on my defense at least magnemite has a eye. this is just 2 gears with somethings on them.Leemaster777 said:Please explain to me how Gear is in any way worse or significantly different from Magnemite. Floating magnet is fine, but somehow floating gear is crap?Thrashgrinder said:They All look shit.. i mean there is one pokemon who is just 2 gears. 2 gears man.
Come on, I mean, magnets, how the fuck do they work?
smartmoose said:To all the pokefans out there remember:
[/QUOTE]
Made my day, thank you XD
Okay, fair enough I suppose, you don't like either one. That's your opinion. But Gear has an eye too, two of them in fact. Well, four if you count the two eyes on each part. And yes, they are eyes, it's just that one of them doesn't have a pupil is all.Thrashgrinder said:first of all i didnt say magnemite wasnt shit. and on my defense at least magnemite has a eye. this is just 2 gears with somethings on them.Leemaster777 said:Please explain to me how Gear is in any way worse or significantly different from Magnemite. Floating magnet is fine, but somehow floating gear is crap?Thrashgrinder said:They All look shit.. i mean there is one pokemon who is just 2 gears. 2 gears man.
Come on, I mean, magnets, how the fuck do they work?
I looked again. i still dont think it has eyes. it has 1 little circle 1 little square and a blue nut.arc1991 said:No. The gears have eye's as well...Look again.Thrashgrinder said:first of all i didnt say magnemite wasnt shit. and on my defense at least magnemite has a eye. this is just 2 gears with somethings on them.Leemaster777 said:Please explain to me how Gear is in any way worse or significantly different from Magnemite. Floating magnet is fine, but somehow floating gear is crap?Thrashgrinder said:They All look shit.. i mean there is one pokemon who is just 2 gears. 2 gears man.
Come on, I mean, magnets, how the fuck do they work?
I thought somebody was going to get pissy about my grammar correction; I'm glad you didn't. Strangely enough, I share your views on Pokemon too. They're just dragging things out now.Sniper Team 4 said:Finally. Scrolling through posts and no one pointed that out.Geekosaurus said:*There
I remember 151 (yes, I count Mew as he was in the TV show). After that, I stopped caring. Too many now.