Ando85 said:
I apologize if this thread has been done. I did several searches and didn't find any so here we go.
Warning this is a bit graphic as it shows a dog being shot.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDBZr4ie2AE
I believe the owner was getting arrested for being inside a perimeter set up by police to protect people near a crime scene. This is illegal.
There is two opposing views here. Most react with outrage because the dog got shot and killed by a police officer and that there were other options that wouldn't of resulted in the dog's death. The other view is that it was the owner's fault for not restraining the dog properly and disrupting the police at a crime scene.
The youtube debate in the comments gets sort of vile with name calling and such due to no mods I guess. I think this might be a better place to talk about it. What is your stance on this situation and why?
He was not inside the perimeter, he was arrested for filming them(which is perfectly legal).
With that out of the way, this was an abomination. If you watch the video, the dog was clearly not attacking but being friendly. It sniffed around the ground, and was just standing there. Then, after being approached by the officer, it jumped, not at the officer like they claim, but straight up in the air like most excited dogs will do, and they shot it. Did you also know that the man in question is currently suing that police department on the grounds of police brutality? They punished him by killing his dog, plain and simple. Anyone who has spent much time with dogs can see that the animal was being friendly, not violent, and they shot it anyway.
It is my firm belief that all 3 officers involved should be fired for failing to keep their cool in a stressful situation, it's not safe to have police who fire their guns at non-threats just because they're in a stressful situation. Further, the officer that actually fired his weapon should be liable in the same way that a civilian would be, both in criminal and civil courts.