"Ugly" People Booted Off Dating Site

Recommended Videos
Sep 8, 2010
157
0
0
Chrono212 said:
TheMagicLemur said:
Chrono212 said:
Dating sites are inherently flawed consumer products.
Met my girlfriend on a dating site; been together over 3 years now. Suspect user issues.
Touché. But no. Note my age. I've not been legaly able to join those kind of sites, let alone actually use them.
I'm intreaged by your point of view, as one only hears of horror stories related to dating sites.
Ah. You should refrain from judgement until you try them, them. And yeah, they can go wrong. So can actually just trying to date, in the real world, with no fancy interwebs.

As someone who was always awkward in social situations, SoulGeek was really helpful for me because it allowed me to get to know my girlfriend before we committed to anything.

That said, I am not a beautiful person. Beautiful people do not need this function. Beautiful people who want to have all the "ugly" people stripped from their dating pool don't need a place to congregate, they need to be given Glasgow smiles.
 

Thundero13

New member
Mar 19, 2009
2,392
0
0
I am ugly, and I don't give a damn, if anyone is big-headed enough about their looks to say they only want to go out with a beautiful person then I never ever want to meet any of them, that website is where big-headed people go to date.
 

Uncreation

New member
Aug 4, 2009
476
0
0
A Tasty Burger said:
I don't see anything wrong with that. I wouldn't date an ugly chick. Would you? Didn't think so. He just removed a bunch of junk that you won't have to search through to find someone you would actually go out with.
Yes, i would date girls that most people (society, if you want) consider ugly. I have no problem with that. Don't presume you speak for everyone.

WorldCritic said:
Excuse me for a moment *smashes head on desk repeatedly* sorry about that. Please let that site be hacked, because that's terrible.
Finally, someone i can agree with, on this thread. If i could, i would kill this site with fire! It would be nice if someone... anonymous... where to go and tear them a new one. :)
 

Johnny Impact

New member
Aug 6, 2008
1,528
0
0
Eri said:
The site is just so stupid. Not even talking about the ugly people thing. Good looking people DON'T NEED a dating site to find another person. I'm sure they get asked out like every other day. I know several girls who are just -moderately- attractive and they get asked out all the time when they are at work. And that's just at work.
Bingo.

I don't socialize but I've seen two seriously attractive women come through my workplace. To set some context, the boss is an overweight middle-aged man with two delinquent teenage kids, an unhappy home life, and a sour old hippo of a wife. He's not an evil man but he *is* a prime candidate for affairs and/or harassment.

The first of these women was a stupid, lazy, loud-mouthed *****. However, because she was also six feet of slender raven-haired beauty, two of the guys developed serious crushes on her despite her personality. She got away with shit on a daily basis that would have gotten anyone else fired, mostly because the boss liked looking at her ass. To this day I wonder if she gave him quickies in the restroom to keep her job.

The other was pleasant, helpful, and one of the finest workers I've ever seen. As a reward for this she was subjected to sexual harassment from the boss for most of the time she was there. This is not a rumor, I personally witnessed it on multiple occasions. Yes, she was pretty, with a fondness for painted-on pants. But smooth, naturally bronzed skin and an indescribable ass are not grounds for having that ass repeatedly grabbed by a horny doofus old enough to be your father.

Yes, I am aware not all men are like this. I myself am not. Not all men harass their female subordinates, either. Nor is harassment one-way. It's just mostly one-way.

The issue is control. Some guys control themselves and some don't. The problem at the heart of it, I think, is that many guys aren't even willing to try. Employing the unutterably flimsy excuse that they "can't control themselves," they gleefully abandon any notion of control, becoming the kind of knuckle-dragging cat-callers that give my gender a bad name. And they're so deep inside this problem they can't even see it as a problem. Guys have called me a ****** for looking away when a pretty woman came in to my work. This is how deep it goes. Many men are so shallow, so into themselves, not only do they not control themselves, they think extending women a small measure of courtesy is seriously aberrant, deviant behavior, deserving only of ridicule.

Edit: But then, what do I know? Being courteous never did anything for me. [foreveralone.jpg]
 

Jaime_Wolf

New member
Jul 17, 2009
1,194
0
0
I think someone is missing the point. Sure you are all special snowflakes and you're all beautiful in your own way, but the website is rather obviously talking about conventional beauty - you know, the sort that you have been trained both socially and evolutionarily to find attractive.

Denying that some people are more physically attractive than others is silly.

(I love all of the people who are doing the exact same thing to the "beautiful" people that they're arguing people shouldn't do to more average people.)
 

Agayek

Ravenous Gormandizer
Oct 23, 2008
5,178
0
0
Scorched_Cascade said:
I think the point was "We have sincere regret for the unfortunate people who were wrongly admitted to the site and who believed, albeit for a short while, that they were beautiful,"

TimeLord was saying who are these people to say who is and who is not beautiful? Or who are these people to be telling others that they are not beautiful just because their members don't like the look of them?

That announcement from the site owner was just...inflammatory.
Newsflash, there is indeed objective standards for beauty. I can't say that the site actually used them, as I don't have enough information to make a claim either way, but that fact remains. There are aspects of the human body that are universally thought of as "attractive", and that doesn't even touch on the cultural aspects of beauty.

Even beyond that, it's a private site. They can exclude people for whatever reason they want. Hell, if they kicked off 80% of their userbase for the stated reason of "for the lulz", it would still be perfectly acceptable.

Anyone who got offended by this needs to remove themselves from the gene pool before their stupidity spreads.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
Oh I remember that site. This is quite old news...I saw it on the news a year ago. And my opinion back then was that booting people off is immoral but it is their site and the site is called 'beautifulpeople' so I guess they're still in the right.
 

SuperNova221

New member
May 29, 2010
393
0
0
Lilani said:
Dango said:
A website for narcissistic assholes...

I am disappoint.
I feel quite the opposite. Sure, it is appalling that there is actually a market for such a thing, but if someone is actually so openly shallow as to want to choose their partner based entirely on appearance, then by God let them have their cake and eat it. So that way in about 50 or 60 years when they are old, saggy, wrinkled, and alone the source of their regret will be all the more clear to them.

I couldn't have wored it better myself.

I'm completely in favour of letting shallow people find shallow people. Makes it easier for everybody else.
 

Elsarild

New member
Oct 26, 2009
343
0
0
Not exactly beeing picture perfect myself, If the site exclusive call for beautiful people, and they even advent the fact, and since they own the domain, and the site, and also set the rules, this seems perfectly reasonable to me.
 

Chrono212

Fluttershy has a mean K:DR
May 19, 2009
1,846
0
0
TheMagicLemur said:
Chrono212 said:
TheMagicLemur said:
Chrono212 said:
Dating sites are inherently flawed consumer products.
Met my girlfriend on a dating site; been together over 3 years now. Suspect user issues.
Touché. But no. Note my age. I've not been legaly able to join those kind of sites, let alone actually use them.
I'm intreaged by your point of view, as one only hears of horror stories related to dating sites.
Ah. You should refrain from judgement until you try them, them. And yeah, they can go wrong. So can actually just trying to date, in the real world, with no fancy interwebs.

As someone who was always awkward in social situations, SoulGeek was really helpful for me because it allowed me to get to know my girlfriend before we committed to anything.

That said, I am not a beautiful person. Beautiful people do not need this function. Beautiful people who want to have all the "ugly" people stripped from their dating pool don't need a place to congregate, they need to be given Glasgow smiles.
Judgement refrained.
And I like the idea of 'Glasgow smiles'. Heh...
Anyway, I'm not feeling that I'm so in need of a relationship that I have to rely on a website.
Wait a minute...
 

Dfskelleton

New member
Apr 6, 2010
2,851
0
0
Did anybody else think of Vega from Street Fighter when they read the title?

I mean, booting people from a dating site because they're ugly just sounds like him.
OT: It's a site for beautiful people I guess, so if the moderators (?) thought that newcomers were ugly people, then I guess it makes sense to boot them.
Some people are beautiful on the outside, some people are ugly on the outside.
Some people are beautiful on the inside, some people are ugly on the inside.
Mix and match as you will.
It would be foolish to say that "Everyone's beautiful!!1" because not everyone is aesthetically attractive. However, everyone has something in their favor. Whether it be good looks, intelligence, mind control powers, a good personality, nobody is without good traits.
 

bug_chaser

New member
Mar 15, 2009
54
0
0
How do they verify that the posted pictures are actually current photos of the applying users? Webcam or something? Even then, you could have an attractive person helping a friend get on the site.

If private sites want to have some sort of "let's have everybody vote whether or not you're pretty enough to be on the island" membership criteria, fine, but I wouldn't join the site because, while I'd like to think I'm attractive enough to join, I wouldn't want to be limited to someone else's definitions of beauty in my (now quite happily concluded) dating search.

On the other hand, it would be worth a fee if information was verified in advance-I've done some internet dating and lemme just say that there were a few women I met in person who only vaguely resembled their profile pictures. I'm sure plenty of women have had similar experiences, so a way of verifying that the picture (and the claim, "I don't live in my mom's basement") is accurate could be a beautiful thing.
 

FaithorFire

New member
Mar 14, 2010
199
0
0
TimeLord said:
What the hell Internet?! Everyone is beautiful, they don't need you telling them whether they are or not.

-40 faith in humanity
Jeez, turn the "I'm Holier than the rest of you" crap down. Its a private site, they get to turn away people who don't meet their standards. I have no doubt I WOULD NOT qualify for that site either.
If people want to discriminate against others based on looks then that's fine. If this nonsense is what makes you lose faith in humanity then you've not being paying enough attention to the past 10,000 years of history.
 

MasterChief892039

New member
Jun 28, 2010
631
0
0
If you're willing to submit yourself for judgement to a site called "beautifulpeople.com", why act upset when you're judged?

If ugly people were getting booted off a regular dating site, yeah, that would be a dick move. But people know what they're getting themselves into when they sign up for a site like that.