Underage pregnancy in the UK

Recommended Videos

Irony's Acolyte

Back from the Depths
Mar 9, 2010
3,636
0
0
Why are underage girls getting pregnant? They are having sex, plain and simple. And at really young ages too apparently. What do you expect when the average teenager is having sex as young as 14 and 15? That these kids would know everything there is to about sex and that they would always make good decisions? BAH! The are still practically kids, they don't (for the most part) think in terms of the long run.
 

Palademon

New member
Mar 20, 2010
4,167
0
0
lee1287 said:
why are they doing it? When i was 12 i was into pokemon and yu-gi-oh, not poking her. (harharharr)
I'm 16 and interested in all of the above :D
But, I'm unattractive.
 

willsham45

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,130
0
0
I recon it is because the teach sex education too early.
If you don't know it then you are less likly to think humm lets try this.
Its like some schools teaching kids not to commit sewerside...by simply saying it it triggers ideas, especilly in those who dont understand it.
 

Nanaki316

New member
Oct 23, 2009
530
0
0
I'll just speak for myself. I got pregnant at 16, had my daughter at 17. We used contraception, BOTH of us did and we still got pregnant. So you probably shouldn't assume that just because lots of teenagers get pregnant that they're not using anything.

Don't get me wrong, I'm well aware of our "Jeremy Kyle" community of teenagers who are too dumb to use anything and don't realise the consequences. As for them, I'd probably say they're the idiots who think "Ahh it'll never happen to me."
 

number2301

New member
Apr 27, 2008
836
0
0
Mistermixmaster said:
thenumberthirteen said:
number2301 said:
Simple (99%) solution to the problem, all teenage girls get the implant at 13. Job done.
That seems to be quite popular now. I've seen posters for it a bus stations and things. What I want to know is why I can't get implanted with some cool chemical as well. Like whatever Captain America had.
Question! I'm sorry, but what is this implant you both speak about? Can anyone bring me up to date on this?

OT: I guess stupidity/ignorance has to take the blame for this one? As I don't live in the UK I dunno 'bout how the sex-education is over there, and feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

I remember that my class had only the negative aspects of sex and STD's covered, along with the stuff like condoms, p-pills, spirals and all that. They wanted us to not want to have sex as a result of sex-ed, but if we were still dumb enough to not be "scared off" (I think that was their plan anyway) then at least we'd do it safely.

(also, my dumb humour was satisfied for today by seeing thenumberthirteen quoting number2301. It's like we're moving into some new sort of society where we got numbers, not names or something XD)
Sorry all but I've completely lost track of the thread but just wanted to answer this question, the implant is a version of the pill which is implanted under the skin which lasts 2-3 years. Simple.
 

Numachuka

New member
Sep 3, 2010
385
0
0
Fallen-Angel Risen-Demon said:
Chavs chavs everywhere, no matter where you look...
That's my explanation.

OT: I live in Hampshire, but I must be in a good area because I haven't heard of any pregnancies around here.
 

Flame Roarg

New member
Sep 24, 2009
14
0
0
It's not because people in the UK have sex without condoms, it's because condoms don't always work, it's like a 97% chance of working. That's how much sex people here have. Oh, yeah, it is alcohol as well. And underage sex. We have a 12 year old father somewhere. Damn...
 

RaikuFA

New member
Jun 12, 2009
4,370
0
0
if its anything like the pregnant teens ive met in america, its the fact that theyre either whores who cant think or they just want attention

i dunno how it works in the uk though
 

Stephanos132

New member
Sep 7, 2009
287
0
0
Responsibility seems to be a dirty word nowadays. It's all about rights instead, and some people genuinely think it's their right to procreate.

As for the teen pregnancies, it's probably a combination the feckless parents dodging their responsibilities, the moronic government initiatives making it financially viable to spawn more overlords children (made even worse with rising unemployment and little in the way of unskilled labour) and possible changes in our society (rights over responsibilities again).

Edit: When you think about it, it's not a terribly stupid thing to do (have kids, live off taxed monies as pets of the government). At the very least they can end up with a home and an income without much work at all, which is pretty much what humanity has been working towards ever since civilisations and economies existed.
 

k-ossuburb

New member
Jul 31, 2009
1,312
0
0
Well the reasons why are obvious: people are stupid. Still, I find this to be such pointless issue since the pregnancy rate in the U.K. is decreasing anyway; these kids are doing us a favour by keeping the population up.
 
Jun 26, 2009
7,508
0
0
k-ossuburb said:
Well the reasons why are obvious: people are stupid. Still, I find this to be such pointless issue since the pregnancy rate in the U.K. is decreasing anyway; these kids are doing us a favor by keeping the population up.
We want the population to go down if anything. The worlds full enough as it is, let alone if everyone has five babies each. Hell, I know three people who have eight or ten siblings.
 

Verlander

New member
Apr 22, 2010
2,449
0
0
Zac Smith said:
"What are you complaining about? 51 out of 1000? Whoppdee-friggin-do. In America it's 86 out of 1000. We're number one! horray"

America has 310,000,000 people living in it the UK has 62,000,000. Do the math yourself and find out the percentage
That makes little sense. So what the countries have different populations? Interestingly enough, Britain's landmass is 2.5% of the USA, yet it's population is 20% of the USA, meaning per square mile we massively outnumber you.

I couldn't find a page that said the rate of teen pregnancy in the US or UK? Someone link me
 

Lord Beautiful

New member
Aug 13, 2008
5,940
0
0
Hosker said:
I only consider someone to be under-age if they are physically too young to be pregnant.

On topic though, because there are a lot of chavetts around?
This post has been:

Polanski Approved.

OP: Erm, stupidity, laziness, and/or lack of responsibility, methinks.
 

SimuLord

Whom Gods Annoy
Aug 20, 2008
10,077
0
0
If it's anything like Nevada here in the good ol' US of A, combination of poor education, a feeling of low self-esteem among teenage girls leading to them thinking that having a baby will give them a sense of purpose and direction in life, and plenty of idiot guys thinking "great, I don't have to use a rubber or pull out" (or worse, those same guys being told "It's ok, I'm on the Pill" when the girl is lying through her teeth---moral of the story, guys? Wrap it anyway unless you're SURE that you'd be OK with her getting knocked up.)
 

bruunwald

New member
Feb 26, 2010
106
0
0
There's a better question that is rarely - if ever - asked in such discussions, and it is, why does Western society place such a dark and bitter cloud over what is a natural, instinctive urge and a natural process?

One could argue that there is a practical issue of how a baby born to young people with fewer means can become a greater burden on society. However, I personally believe that argument stems from the same piss-poor attitude that created the notion that sex is evil in the first place.

I'm not saying children aren't a big responsibility. They are. I am a dad. I know. What I am saying, from the point of view of someone who was born to a young mother, is that society's animosity toward young mothers and their children, and fear of sex, are the real problem. It's a back-assward attitude based on Puritan spite, and it doesn't help anything.

My mother was three days from seventeen when she had me. She worked hard to support me. I turned out a good kid. The hardest thing about it, and the biggest evil of the whole situation, was the outright hatred we were subjected to, from supposed "good Christians" just frothing at the mouth for a chance to judge and punish my mother, and myself by extension, by refusing her work, turning her down for credit, badmouthing her on the bus, snickering at her, shouting at her, and outright trying to take advantage of us both.

Having babies young can be an inconvenience, and even a hardship, but it's hardly an evil. It would be less of an inconvenience and less of a hardship on everyone, if society could get over the stigma of evil and wrongness it has applied to these situations, and just work at being human about it.
 

Stephanos132

New member
Sep 7, 2009
287
0
0
bruunwald said:
There's a better question that is rarely - if ever - asked in such discussions, and it is, why does Western society place such a dark and bitter cloud over what is a natural, instinctive urge and a natural process?

One could argue that there is a practical issue of how a baby born to young people with fewer means can become a greater burden on society. However, I personally believe that argument stems from the same piss-poor attitude that created the notion that sex is evil in the first place.
More the fact that it does become a burden on society, as these young parents are at least partially sustained by taxpayer appropriated funds. It's forced charity, in a fashion, and that will almost certainly breed contempt.

Regarding opinions on sex, it's certainly improved lately. At the very least no one can claim ignorance on the matter, it is forced down our throats on a near daily basis.

bruunwald said:
What I am saying, from the point of view of someone who was born to a young mother, is that society's animosity toward young mothers and their children, and fear of sex, are the real problem. It's a back-assward attitude based on Puritan spite, and it doesn't help anything.

My mother was three days from seventeen when she had me. She worked hard to support me. I turned out a good kid.
I think the difference between your mother and the ones we bemoan here is the that magic word, 'work'. She had to make a living for herself and her offspring with little to no help. Nowadays, young parents can get all the help they need and more, theoretically at least. The fact that this comes out of the public purse is a point of contention for some.
 

twaddle

New member
Nov 17, 2009
1,327
0
0
i noticed that problem going around while i was back home, but after i moved across the pond to the U.S. for keeps it seems to be far worse here. Especially in the african american community. I feel homesick.