Damn straight son.CloudKiller said:I'm sure the Quarians said exactly the same thing.Cpt_Oblivious said:It will be a war between the Synthetics and the Organics. We'll probably win.
Damn straight son.CloudKiller said:I'm sure the Quarians said exactly the same thing.Cpt_Oblivious said:It will be a war between the Synthetics and the Organics. We'll probably win.
Well I suppose if nature doesn't kill us the Government will. I don't know which is more lame, seriously what about some sort of cool apocalypse like Zombies or killer Digimon?Alex The Rat said:I wonder if by "in the far future" he really means 2012?
Nah... I'm seeing super flu, super cold, super super flu, super cancer and zombieism.CATS FTW said:Deus Ex here I come! Or invisible war, if you had an xbox. That game was so awesome.
Does anyone see FEV virus coming out of this?
HA! we could be the last generation that has to die! BURN!marter said:Soon, scientist will be able to keep people alive forever, by creating new cells for the body.
I can't wait...
i thinking more like the combine gunships/stridersPurpleSky said:I'm thinking mutants/zombies.Lemon Of Life said:The beginning of the end?
Since super robots are the only conceivable outcome of this.
As long as you continue to go for your daily/weekly/monthly cell infusion.Mercurio128 said:HA! we could be the last generation that has to die! BURN!marter said:Soon, scientist will be able to keep people alive forever, by creating new cells for the body.
I can't wait...
Have you heard of Murphy's law? Don't you remember Dolly the cloned sheep? That technology isn't ready and won't be for a least 5 to 10 years. Its like every exploitation systems Apple and Microsoft don't get good until all the bugs been taken care of. Also, Window Vista? Like Asta la Vista PC.PurpleSky said:Quoting the article:
![]()
Scientists in the US have succeeded in developing the first synthetic living cell.
The researchers constructed a bacterium's "genetic software" and transplanted it into a host cell.
The resulting microbe then looked and behaved like the species "dictated" by the synthetic DNA.
The advance, published in Science, has been hailed as a scientific landmark, but critics say there are dangers posed by synthetic organisms.
Dr Craig Venter says yeast, chemicals, and computers were used by scientists
The researchers hope eventually to design bacterial cells that will produce medicines and fuels and even absorb greenhouse gases.
........
Professor Julian Savulescu, from the Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford, said the potential of this science was "in the far future, but real and significant".
"But the risks are also unparalleled," he continued. "We need new standards of safety evaluation for this kind of radical research and protections from military or terrorist misuse and abuse.
"These could be used in the future to make the most powerful bioweapons imaginable. The challenge is to eat the fruit without the worm."
Here's the link to the full article http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science_and_environment/10132762.stm
Personally,the number of uses for this technology,and their implications,boggle my mind.
Yeah, because artificially building living organisms is so fucking easy. You do realise that this technology could lead to some serious scientific advancements, like the eradication of genetic defects, the artificial development of biofuel, the creation of vaccines and the disposal of carbon dioxide? There's likely a ton of other stuff possible too. Stop and think for a second, and you'll realise that all that "wasted money" you ***** about has improved your life rediculously.magicmonkeybars said:Well one step closer to being replaced by something better.
I don't really see what the big fuss is about the onlt difference between this cell and a "normal" one is that a computer build it's dna rather then "nature".
Just another case of science wasting money on useless shit no one needs or cares about.
Yay for playing god I guess.
i'm there too....Julianking93 said:You're not the only one.PurpleSky said:Bleh,I never look in that section.Julianking93 said:It may have something to do with there already being a thread about this in the Religion & Politics sectionPurpleSky said:OT:This is a big deal.Come on people!Why aren't they responding to this news?
But, people seem to be posting now.
It's always the same few people posting in that section. Cuddly Tomato, Amnestic, Skeleon, and me.
*facepalm*Snotnarok said:What makes this article annoying? It like many other science things will not see light on the news.
Anyone else know we slowed light down to an observable level by using a NEW 5th state of matter? Probably not many do because of how shit the news is.