Video Games Are Officially Art!

Recommended Videos
Apr 28, 2008
14,634
0
0
Vrex360 said:
Also a side note, there's a game exhibit at the Smithsonian?
Why yes, there is [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/109801-Smithsonians-Art-of-Video-Games-Selections-Announced].
 

rsvp42

New member
Jan 15, 2010
897
0
0
Legally, it's cool and if it inspires game developers to greater heights, so much the better, but I can't help feeling this is just a technicality. I mean, devs still have the same abilities as always to make great games.
 

Atheist.

Overmind
Sep 12, 2008
631
0
0
starfox444 said:
As an engineering student I look down upon all arts by default.

WHY DID THEY RUIN VIDEOGAMES FOR ME!?
But art has such an incredible impact on structural engineering. Why would you look down on something that helped innovate your field?
 

TheXRatedDodo

New member
Jan 7, 2009
445
0
0
What's sad is that so many people care about a piece of legislation stating "Games Are Art! IT'S OFFICIAL!"
As if it weren't official to all gamers out there with or without a piece of paper stating so already?
And while we've been chasing this "art" classification, games have just gotten more and more cinematic and less about the core mechanics and fundamental FUN factor.

Now if you'll excuse me, I'll go back to playing Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3, an unashamed gamer's game. 'Cos guess what? To me, that's art.
 

Ninonybox_v1legacy

New member
Apr 2, 2008
1,974
0
0
Innegativeion said:
A certain gaming celebrity, on gaming as an art form and a science, directed at the haters:

Somewhere, Roger Ebert is eating his words.
I was going to put ode to joy....but this is more fitting.

Finally my brothers and sisters....our day has come.
 

instantbenz

Pixel Pusher
Mar 25, 2009
744
0
0
Lord Mountbatten Reborn said:
Does this mean we need more video games that don't make a lick of sense and apparently have deep symbolism?
You don't have to play any artistic game, just as you aren't mandated to watch a movie.

The products of this are irrelevant at this point, what's fantastic is a dev can be federally funded by nea and no longer needs to be slave to a company. AAA gaming's grasp around some of the most ambitious of devs will loosen. They can write grants and stop making things for the big names.

Innovation HO!
 

Tim Mazzola

New member
Dec 27, 2010
192
0
0
Not to be a negative nancy, but there's still probably going to be SOME scrutiny and attempted censorship from the haters. I mean, look at the PMRC in the 80s. Music was art then, but they still talked about censoring it. Games are recognized as art now. It doesn't make us IMMUNE to oppression, but it sure as hell gives us a damn good barricade from it.
 

Custard_Angel

New member
Aug 6, 2009
1,236
0
0
Excuse me...

What does this actually mean?

Does this change anything at all?

Honest questions... I'm reading this and thinking... well... so what?

Whether its considered art or not, Portal will always be a great game and Daikatana will always be considered a piece of shit.

Why does that label mean anything?
 

Tsunimo

New member
Nov 19, 2009
855
0
0
Yay! Finally. I suppose I could see there hesitation when there are games like this
being made.
But if this
Projo said:
counted as art before... I'm not sure how much celebrating we should be doing.
 

Halo Fanboy

New member
Nov 2, 2008
1,118
0
0
If card, board, pen and paper ect. games aren't also considered art then this is a ridiculous decision.
 

Craorach

New member
Jan 17, 2011
749
0
0
You can put your old filthy bedroom on display as "art" and win awards.

You can chop corpses in half and encase them in transparent resin and call it "art".

So.. umm.. yay?