I'm impressed. The only thing I didn't really agree with was the animals part. In the same way that bigotry towards bigots is still bigotry. People are people, people are just wrong a lot.Oswald D Grant said:ಠ_ಠ This thread.
First of all, virginity doesn't exist. It's a made-up concept, the state of not having done something. It's an arbitrary intangible invented by men who were worried that their children might not be theirs.
By fretting over virginity women reinforce the idea that they're chattels whose value is determined by their value to a man, which in turn lies in their chastity. It's hardly surprising that a women's studies major who presumably spends a lot of time thinking about this stuff and what it means should decide to exploit it in a deservedly cynical way.
The bid is irrelevant until someone actually pays it, so I don't see any point in discussing the 3.7m at this point.
Third, people who consider whores 'not human' are animals.
The actual matter of the selling of sex is a morally complex issue. Some of the objections to it are based on mere envy - 'why can't they work hard for a living like me?' Well, why should they want to? Where is it written that someone being better off than you for less work means that they're cheating?
Prostitution can be psychologically harmful for a number of reasons, and those reasons vary from person to person. Ultimately as long as it's consensual it should be each person's choice who they have sex with and why. There are many far worse reasons to have sex than money, and nobody makes most of them illegal.
If you actually care about the issue I'd suggest reading Confessions of a College Callgirl [http://collegecallgirl.blogspot.com/]. The writer is intelligent and articulate, and writes lucidly about her experiences, showing us how having sex for money isn't necessarily a big deal, talking about the times she's enjoyed it, but not shying away from the harmful side of it and the sense she struggles with of her self-worth being tied up in her sexual appeal to men.
If you don't actually care about the issue and just want to spout off along the lines of "omg what a slut!" I'd suggest you shut your pie hole. Seriously.
You're right, 'animals' was hyperbole. Those people who dehumanise whores are still human beings. They just aren't very good human beings.Easykill said:I'm impressed. The only thing I didn't really agree with was the animals part. In the same way that bigotry towards bigots is still bigotry. People are people, people are just wrong a lot.
I'd have to disagree with you on this point, as far as i'm aware the first time a woman has sex they break the whateveritis and bleed because of it. Meaning that the first time a woman has sex will be different from all others.Oswald D Grant said:ಠ_ಠ This thread.
First of all, virginity doesn't exist. It's a made-up concept, the state of not having done something. It's an arbitrary intangible invented by men who were worried that their children might not be theirs.
Unless she already broke it doing athletics, or through masturbation, or in any number of other ways. Or the first time she has sex it doesn't involve vaginal penetration - although many girls who pledge chastity until marriage do just that, remaining 'technical virgins'.savandicus said:I'd have to disagree with you on this point, as far as i'm aware the first time a woman has sex they break the whateveritis and bleed because of it. Meaning that the first time a woman has sex will be different from all others.
-Erana said:Tempting, but no.
My virginity is just as valuable, thus I shall give it only to the one I deem worthy.
You bin readin' too much o'them thar porns, boy.wordsmith said:The funny thing is, I don't think there was a clause saying "Whoever pays must be the one to take it". What if the buyer happened to buy her as a present for the local football squad or worse yet- his pet![]()
I can. This isn't awesome at all.cobra_ky said:clearly no one can argue this is anything but awesome.
Technically, the same could be said of, say, a plumber, or anyone else whose services are being requested.Baby Tea said:I can. This isn't awesome at all.cobra_ky said:clearly no one can argue this is anything but awesome.
She's whoring herself out. I'm intrigued how she could call this 'empowering' when she's just reduced herself physically to a mere monetary worth. Whether she's being payed 3.7 million or 5 bucks, the title and implications are the same, but we're just haggling price. Disgusting.
No, the same couldn't be said.Vrud said:Technically, the same could be said of, say, a plumber.Baby Tea said:I can. This isn't awesome at all.cobra_ky said:clearly no one can argue this is anything but awesome.
She's whoring herself out. I'm intrigued how she could call this 'empowering' when she's just reduced herself physically to a mere monetary worth. Whether she's being payed 3.7 million or 5 bucks, the title and implications are the same, but we're just haggling price. Disgusting.
Better than getting search button'd.Sven und EIN HUND said:Wow, what a rez. But yeah, this is ridiculous