It was edmund blackadderAardvark said:I reckon it's only there because the yanks had to liberate their arses in WW2, then were repaid in snootiness.
I hear the phrase "cheese-eating surrender monkey" was first coined by Willy in the Simpsons.
It was edmund blackadderAardvark said:I reckon it's only there because the yanks had to liberate their arses in WW2, then were repaid in snootiness.
I hear the phrase "cheese-eating surrender monkey" was first coined by Willy in the Simpsons.
Well played sir, well played.More Fun To Compute said:I have to say that a lot of the American posters are very late with their posts in the thread. Almost too late to be of any use but I suppose that is only as should be expected.
Buuut they did also help America, in beating the french. Both on "American" soil, and by wageing war directly on britain at home... And yes, it was maybe just to help them selves, but when the states landed troops in Normandy, that wasent a pure selfless act either...Aardvark said:I reckon it's only there because the yanks had to liberate their arses in WW2, then were repaid in snootiness.
I hear the phrase "cheese-eating surrender monkey" was first coined by Willy in the Simpsons.
Im pretty sure the commander was the King. WHO WOULD BE FRENCH. Joan of Ark was a general. She didn't have complete control of the army. Plus, the war ended after her death. Years after. She just began the movement.[/quote]pimppeter2 said:I'm mixing up my world wars, sorry...Berethond said:snip
And it's simple.
The victory is, in essence, the commander's. And, since the commander was not French, it does not count as a French victory.
Oh dear, the problem with insulting someone is that more often or not it comes back and bites you in the backside as it has done with you.Razada said:Oi, retard, explain why most of our language is based on the French brought over by the normans.Faps said:Nor were they French, they were Normans with their own language and culture that had deep ties to their Norse roots.NeutralDrow said:That's like saying my neighbors across the street aren't Americans, because they came here from Mexico. The Normans came from Scandinavia, adopted and adapted French culture, and swore vassalage to the French king. They weren't Vikings at that point.Faps said:Normans weren't French, they were Viking settlers and Frankish (German) natives.FolkLikePanda said:Battle of Hastings, 1066, only war I can think where they but us British, and that was Normandy not the whole of France.
The name "Normans" derives from "Northmen" or "Norsemen", after the Vikings from Scandinavia who founded Normandy (Northmannia in its original Latin).
Or somehow explain why the normans, with there own language, spoke French in court.
I've been calling the French cowards and surrender-monkeys since I was about 12. The war on terror didn't start for about 10 years after that, so I'm guessing it's not because they wouldn't agree to help invade Iraq (though they didn't contribute to Afghanistan either and that one WAS a sanctioned war.)Artinam said:This entire, 'the French are cowards' things is only because the French government decided that invading Iraq around the UN would be a bad idea.
We already paid that debt off, we gave the cash back in the 1800's and then the "saved their asses" part in WW1. We don't owe shit as a nation to anyone. Well maybe an apology to a few individuals, but not to entire nations.axia777 said:All I have to say is America partly owes it's Freedom to France. During the Revolutionary War France gave America lots of money, ships, and supplies when America was in dire need of help against the British. Sure they may have been doing it just to piss of the British, but in the end they helped us. That counts for a lot in my book.
Also, who cares if they surrendered against the Germans? The Blitzkrieg attacks that Germany did during WWII rolled across Europe. They burnt many places to the ground with out mercy. What were the French to do? Keep their pride yet get their country burnt to the ground? They ended up fighting the Germans later on in the war anyway.
Not true, the Americans where the main factor behind the German 1918 Spring Offensive which ultimately failed and allowed the Allies to launch their own offensive in the summer which was one of the factors that ended the war.Sulu said:Correct and the Americans did very little in that war. It was a Franco-British victoryFaps said:They didn't surrender in World War 1Berethond said:What did they do in the 100 Year's War?
(Narrowly beat out the British... then surrender)
What did they do in World War 1?
(Surrender)
What did they do in World War 2?
(Surrender)
<url=http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html>See here, for a comprehensive list.
That is all besides the point. I also never said we owed them anything. I just think that if it were not for them we would not be America, period. The British would have overwhelmed us tith their economic superiority.asinann said:We already paid that debt off, we gave the cash back in the 1800's and then the "saved their asses" part in WW1. We don't owe shit as a nation to anyone. Well maybe an apology to a few individuals, but not to entire nations.
That's what I'm telling the other guy. Still, The king is the ultimate commander of the troops. Just like the President of the Us is today. You wouldn't say the President won the war, you'd say America did. Just like you wouldn't say Joan one them the war. Because she didn't.asinann said:That would mean that the President won every war in American history then. The commander is not the person in charge of the nation but the highest ranking person on site during the battle. The person who actually made the decisions. The King of France during Saint Joan's life conspired with the Catholic Church to have her tried and convicted of witchcraft because both parties felt that she was a threat to their political power.asinann said:Im pretty sure the commander was the King. WHO WOULD BE FRENCH. Joan of Ark was a general. She didn't have complete control of the army. Plus, the war ended after her death. Years after. She just began the movement.Berethond said:I'm mixing up my world wars, sorry...pimppeter2 said:snip
And it's simple.
The victory is, in essence, the commander's. And, since the commander was not French, it does not count as a French victory.
Oh yeah? Frenchmen suck? Please, ellaborate.TheSunshineHobo said:The Allied forces won? WWI: Allies=Germans, Austria-Hungary, Ottomans, etc. Entente=British, French, US. France was going to lose, until everybody else came to their rescue. Regardless of all this, one fact remains: French people suck.pimppeter2 said:Since when? I'm pretty sure the Allied forces won. (that would include the French) The Germans never even reached ParisTheSunshineHobo said:Fair point. And France didn't surrender during WWI, but they still lost.
Its helped, but It wasn't the cause of the victory. France and Brits would have won either wayFaps said:Not true, the Americans where the main factor behind the German 1918 Spring Offensive which ultimately failed and allowed the Allies to launch their own offensive in the summer which was one of the factors that ended the war.Sulu said:Correct and the Americans did very little in that war. It was a Franco-British victoryFaps said:They didn't surrender in World War 1Berethond said:What did they do in the 100 Year's War?
(Narrowly beat out the British... then surrender)
What did they do in World War 1?
(Surrender)
What did they do in World War 2?
(Surrender)
<url=http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html>See here, for a comprehensive list.
The Germans knew that they couldn't hope to compete with the Allies with the influx of American troops and huge industrial capacity so simply by entering the war America did more to end it than 3 years of bloody fighting.
Yes eventually but not until well into 1919 at the cost of many more lives on both sides not to mention the German civilian casualties as a result of the British blockade.pimppeter2 said:Its helped, but It wasn't the cause of the victory. France and Brits would have won either wayFaps said:Not true, the Americans where the main factor behind the German 1918 Spring Offensive which ultimately failed and allowed the Allies to launch their own offensive in the summer which was one of the factors that ended the war.Sulu said:Correct and the Americans did very little in that war. It was a Franco-British victoryFaps said:They didn't surrender in World War 1Berethond said:What did they do in the 100 Year's War?
(Narrowly beat out the British... then surrender)
What did they do in World War 1?
(Surrender)
What did they do in World War 2?
(Surrender)
<url=http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html>See here, for a comprehensive list.
The Germans knew that they couldn't hope to compete with the Allies with the influx of American troops and huge industrial capacity so simply by entering the war America did more to end it than 3 years of bloody fighting.
hes right, they got invaded then got bailed out by the British, and the AmericansFaps said:They didn't surrender in World War 1Berethond said:What did they do in the 100 Year's War?
(Narrowly beat out the British... then surrender)
What did they do in World War 1?
(Surrender)
What did they do in World War 2?
(Surrender)
<url=http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html>See here, for a comprehensive list.