"We surrender" Said the French

Recommended Videos

Madshaw

New member
Jun 18, 2008
670
0
0
Aardvark said:
I reckon it's only there because the yanks had to liberate their arses in WW2, then were repaid in snootiness.

I hear the phrase "cheese-eating surrender monkey" was first coined by Willy in the Simpsons.
It was edmund blackadder
 

magnuslion

New member
Jun 16, 2009
898
0
0
They have'nt won a war since the middle ages, and they have often surrendered to attackers.
 

Stabby Joe

New member
Jul 30, 2008
1,545
0
0
Probably already mentioned but didn't France help America in the US War of Independence?
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
The real question is pre or post Napoleon. But I agree, it pretty much comes down to WWII. It might also have something to do with some Xenophobic Americans wanting to point fingers over at Europe. Britain is an ally, Germans already got theirs in the World Wars, so France was the next most obvious target.

By the way, I'm American, and I'm not anti-American. Every place has its Xenophobes. Also, my above theory is wild conjecture, nothing more.
 

DarkLordofDevon

New member
May 11, 2008
478
0
0
We British like picking on the French because we are their enemies for oooh... several centuries before we became allies. We have a good reason.

Also the fact that in the past 2 world wars, had they not had the support of foreign powers they would have completely fallen to Germany... (yes, even WW1. The Germans may not have got to Paris, but without British, American and other troops in the trenches along with the French, they would not have held). That's the past 2 major wars where France has failed to successfully defend her boarders from invaders. Being an island nation it is very easy for us British to crow because we are notoriously hard to conquer.
 

TerribleTerryTate

New member
Feb 4, 2008
384
0
0
More Fun To Compute said:
I have to say that a lot of the American posters are very late with their posts in the thread. Almost too late to be of any use but I suppose that is only as should be expected.
Well played sir, well played.
 

DazBurger

New member
May 22, 2009
1,339
0
0
Aardvark said:
I reckon it's only there because the yanks had to liberate their arses in WW2, then were repaid in snootiness.

I hear the phrase "cheese-eating surrender monkey" was first coined by Willy in the Simpsons.
Buuut they did also help America, in beating the french. Both on "American" soil, and by wageing war directly on britain at home... And yes, it was maybe just to help them selves, but when the states landed troops in Normandy, that wasent a pure selfless act either...
 

asinann

New member
Apr 28, 2008
1,602
0
0
pimppeter2 said:
Berethond said:
I'm mixing up my world wars, sorry...

And it's simple.
The victory is, in essence, the commander's. And, since the commander was not French, it does not count as a French victory.
Im pretty sure the commander was the King. WHO WOULD BE FRENCH. Joan of Ark was a general. She didn't have complete control of the army. Plus, the war ended after her death. Years after. She just began the movement.[/quote]

That would mean that the President won every war in American history then. The commander is not the person in charge of the nation but the highest ranking person on site during the battle. The person who actually made the decisions. The King of France during Saint Joan's life conspired with the Catholic Church to have her tried and convicted of witchcraft because both parties felt that she was a threat to their political power.
 

axia777

New member
Oct 10, 2008
2,895
0
0
All I have to say is America partly owes it's Freedom to France. During the Revolutionary War France gave America lots of money, ships, and supplies when America was in dire need of help against the British. Sure they may have been doing it just to piss of the British, but in the end they helped us. That counts for a lot in my book.

Also, who cares if they surrendered against the Germans? The Blitzkrieg attacks that Germany did during WWII rolled across Europe. They burnt many places to the ground with out mercy. What were the French to do? Keep their pride yet get their country burnt to the ground? They ended up fighting the Germans later on in the war anyway.
 

Faps

New member
Jul 27, 2008
412
0
0
Razada said:
Faps said:
NeutralDrow said:
Faps said:
FolkLikePanda said:
Battle of Hastings, 1066, only war I can think where they but us British, and that was Normandy not the whole of France.
Normans weren't French, they were Viking settlers and Frankish (German) natives.

The name "Normans" derives from "Northmen" or "Norsemen", after the Vikings from Scandinavia who founded Normandy (Northmannia in its original Latin).
That's like saying my neighbors across the street aren't Americans, because they came here from Mexico. The Normans came from Scandinavia, adopted and adapted French culture, and swore vassalage to the French king. They weren't Vikings at that point.
Nor were they French, they were Normans with their own language and culture that had deep ties to their Norse roots.
Oi, retard, explain why most of our language is based on the French brought over by the normans.
Or somehow explain why the normans, with there own language, spoke French in court.
Oh dear, the problem with insulting someone is that more often or not it comes back and bites you in the backside as it has done with you.

English is not based "on the French brought over by the Normans" because firstly they did not speak French they spoke Norman and secondly because English is a Germanic language with it's roots firmly in the Anglo-Frisian dialects brought to Britain by the Anglo-Saxons. It has been influenced by many languages including Norman, which added elements of the Romance languages to English but kept the Germanic core that is still the core of modern English.

The Normans did not speak French in court, they spoke Norman which is a dialect of French much in the same way that Breton is.

Kindly check your facts before you insult me again.
 

asinann

New member
Apr 28, 2008
1,602
0
0
Artinam said:
This entire, 'the French are cowards' things is only because the French government decided that invading Iraq around the UN would be a bad idea.
I've been calling the French cowards and surrender-monkeys since I was about 12. The war on terror didn't start for about 10 years after that, so I'm guessing it's not because they wouldn't agree to help invade Iraq (though they didn't contribute to Afghanistan either and that one WAS a sanctioned war.)

axia777 said:
All I have to say is America partly owes it's Freedom to France. During the Revolutionary War France gave America lots of money, ships, and supplies when America was in dire need of help against the British. Sure they may have been doing it just to piss of the British, but in the end they helped us. That counts for a lot in my book.

Also, who cares if they surrendered against the Germans? The Blitzkrieg attacks that Germany did during WWII rolled across Europe. They burnt many places to the ground with out mercy. What were the French to do? Keep their pride yet get their country burnt to the ground? They ended up fighting the Germans later on in the war anyway.
We already paid that debt off, we gave the cash back in the 1800's and then the "saved their asses" part in WW1. We don't owe shit as a nation to anyone. Well maybe an apology to a few individuals, but not to entire nations.
 

Faps

New member
Jul 27, 2008
412
0
0
Sulu said:
Faps said:
Berethond said:
What did they do in the 100 Year's War?
(Narrowly beat out the British... then surrender)

What did they do in World War 1?
(Surrender)

What did they do in World War 2?
(Surrender)

<url=http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html>See here, for a comprehensive list.
They didn't surrender in World War 1
Correct and the Americans did very little in that war. It was a Franco-British victory
Not true, the Americans where the main factor behind the German 1918 Spring Offensive which ultimately failed and allowed the Allies to launch their own offensive in the summer which was one of the factors that ended the war.

The Germans knew that they couldn't hope to compete with the Allies with the influx of American troops and huge industrial capacity so simply by entering the war America did more to end it than 3 years of bloody fighting.
 

jboking

New member
Oct 10, 2008
2,694
0
0
Probably because we generally have a poor view of them as constantly belittling other countries and yet they surrendered in WW2 and had to be saved.
 

axia777

New member
Oct 10, 2008
2,895
0
0
asinann said:
We already paid that debt off, we gave the cash back in the 1800's and then the "saved their asses" part in WW1. We don't owe shit as a nation to anyone. Well maybe an apology to a few individuals, but not to entire nations.
That is all besides the point. I also never said we owed them anything. I just think that if it were not for them we would not be America, period. The British would have overwhelmed us tith their economic superiority.

I also would like to know why do you hate France so damn much? They are relatively decent country that does less harm to the world than America. What is the problem?
 

Pimppeter2

New member
Dec 31, 2008
16,479
0
0
asinann said:
asinann said:
Berethond said:
pimppeter2 said:
I'm mixing up my world wars, sorry...

And it's simple.
The victory is, in essence, the commander's. And, since the commander was not French, it does not count as a French victory.
Im pretty sure the commander was the King. WHO WOULD BE FRENCH. Joan of Ark was a general. She didn't have complete control of the army. Plus, the war ended after her death. Years after. She just began the movement.
That would mean that the President won every war in American history then. The commander is not the person in charge of the nation but the highest ranking person on site during the battle. The person who actually made the decisions. The King of France during Saint Joan's life conspired with the Catholic Church to have her tried and convicted of witchcraft because both parties felt that she was a threat to their political power.
That's what I'm telling the other guy. Still, The king is the ultimate commander of the troops. Just like the President of the Us is today. You wouldn't say the President won the war, you'd say America did. Just like you wouldn't say Joan one them the war. Because she didn't.
 

Clashero

New member
Aug 15, 2008
2,143
0
0
It's because they never actually won a war
TheSunshineHobo said:
pimppeter2 said:
TheSunshineHobo said:
Fair point. And France didn't surrender during WWI, but they still lost.
Since when? I'm pretty sure the Allied forces won. (that would include the French) The Germans never even reached Paris
The Allied forces won? WWI: Allies=Germans, Austria-Hungary, Ottomans, etc. Entente=British, French, US. France was going to lose, until everybody else came to their rescue. Regardless of all this, one fact remains: French people suck.
Oh yeah? Frenchmen suck? Please, ellaborate.
 

Pimppeter2

New member
Dec 31, 2008
16,479
0
0
Faps said:
Sulu said:
Faps said:
Berethond said:
What did they do in the 100 Year's War?
(Narrowly beat out the British... then surrender)

What did they do in World War 1?
(Surrender)

What did they do in World War 2?
(Surrender)

<url=http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html>See here, for a comprehensive list.
They didn't surrender in World War 1
Correct and the Americans did very little in that war. It was a Franco-British victory
Not true, the Americans where the main factor behind the German 1918 Spring Offensive which ultimately failed and allowed the Allies to launch their own offensive in the summer which was one of the factors that ended the war.

The Germans knew that they couldn't hope to compete with the Allies with the influx of American troops and huge industrial capacity so simply by entering the war America did more to end it than 3 years of bloody fighting.
Its helped, but It wasn't the cause of the victory. France and Brits would have won either way
 

Faps

New member
Jul 27, 2008
412
0
0
pimppeter2 said:
Faps said:
Sulu said:
Faps said:
Berethond said:
What did they do in the 100 Year's War?
(Narrowly beat out the British... then surrender)

What did they do in World War 1?
(Surrender)

What did they do in World War 2?
(Surrender)

<url=http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html>See here, for a comprehensive list.
They didn't surrender in World War 1
Correct and the Americans did very little in that war. It was a Franco-British victory
Not true, the Americans where the main factor behind the German 1918 Spring Offensive which ultimately failed and allowed the Allies to launch their own offensive in the summer which was one of the factors that ended the war.

The Germans knew that they couldn't hope to compete with the Allies with the influx of American troops and huge industrial capacity so simply by entering the war America did more to end it than 3 years of bloody fighting.
Its helped, but It wasn't the cause of the victory. France and Brits would have won either way
Yes eventually but not until well into 1919 at the cost of many more lives on both sides not to mention the German civilian casualties as a result of the British blockade.
 

MortisLegio

New member
Nov 5, 2008
1,258
0
0
Faps said:
Berethond said:
What did they do in the 100 Year's War?
(Narrowly beat out the British... then surrender)

What did they do in World War 1?
(Surrender)

What did they do in World War 2?
(Surrender)

<url=http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/text/france.html>See here, for a comprehensive list.
They didn't surrender in World War 1
hes right, they got invaded then got bailed out by the British, and the Americans