xDarc said:
P.S. READ THE POST- it's not the incident itself, it's the turning point from where everything changed from

to

Get it?... OP follows-
I mean, that's got to be it, right? That's why I can hardly relate at all to people even 5 or 6 years younger than me, at 28?
I thought about my time growing up to put things in perspective.
In third grade the Berlin Wall came down and people were happy. A little while later, the Soviet Union collapsed and people breathed easier. In fifth grade we watched the armed forces whoop the snot out of the Iraqis on CNN, it was no contest and people were only miffed that we had to stop without getting Saddam. No one was ever really scared.
The rest of the 90's were marked by cool, upbeat, pop-culture and economic prosperity. People were concerned with things like living longer, the graying baby boomers wanted more health care, and they wanted to know what to do with their boat loads of cash. You could quit a job and get another one that same day.
The OKC bombing in 95' left a bit of a bad taste, but the lone militia nut angle let people quickly dismiss it with humorous quips about survivalist types. Honestly, the whole Waco thing in 93' already primed us for a character like McVeigh and it was just as quickly forgotten.
It was a time with few threats and little to be afraid of, and it left my childhood happy and care free.
By the time everything started going to shit in 2001, I was 19 years old and was more or less an adult. So things registered to me as cause and effect, not so much as "Behold! Young one! This is the world, and my, my- is it not frightening!"
What I wonder is- what is it like to be a child, to grow up surrounded by so much fear, war, bleak economic prospects and so little hope? Did you see your parents change? Did they argue and fight about what was going around them? Did the kids at school still easily make light of the world erupting into war or did they try their damnedest to ignore it and live in it's shadow?
Just curious. I really think being young or adolescent around that time warped a fair number of folks.
I'm an adult (35) and was an adult or teenager through a lot of this. A lot of people do not like my perspective, especially when I start talking about what I think we should actually be doing in "The Middle East" nowadays.
I think one of the problems with the youth today, and the way things turned out here, was that during the economic upswing of the 1990s we had a heavily liberal goverment and kids were not being taught the things they needed to know due to political correctness. The desire for self validation, and for the extreme left wing baby boomers to instill their ethics through the education system meant that there was very little taught about "current events", with a lot of the more recent developments after "World War II" being glossed over. This lead to the perception that the times of "darkness" were over and that the world was a happy place full of understanding, and the really 'evil' people were tiny fringe minorities.
See, I grew up as a young kid with Iranians blowing up planes, a botched attempt to rescue hostages in The Middle East (even if I didn't understand it then), tensions with Libya and Colonel Kadolfi , and similar things. When I was a kid the media presented "The Taliban", the same guys now, as heroic freedom fighters against Russian oppression. I remember being shown pictures of kids holding guns and RPGs in magazines and being told (and feeling) that I was indeed very lucky. Then of course there was the whole incident where a famous writer was forced into hiding because he dared to criticize Islam in a book called "Satanic Verses" and had a bounty put on his head. There were many, many things going on.... I never had any illusions about "The Middle East" in paticular, but also still remember what was going on with the USSR before their collapse.
The 1990s for me were a brief respite, and I find it disturbing that kids raised during that period of peace were not taught things that had happened right beforehand. I find it mind numbing when I hear younger people talking about how "aren't the Russians are friends?" despite the current activities (Georgia, Ukraine assaination attempt, recent spy ring bust, threatening Poland) because they really have no conception of "The Cold War" other than the words themselves, and don't see the big picture of Russia's "reform" being more or less a lull in between what is the same behavior.
For me 9/11 wasn't a stand alone incident, it was the most intense of a long line of incidents that had been steadily escalating over a period of time. One of the reasons why I am so militant about it, and judge the entire culture and region harshly rather than focusing on "Al Queda" like a lot of idealistic boomers, and the younger generation do. To me Al Queda is simply the newest face of a long standing problem, and if we defeat them entirely, it doesn't matter because the culture is just going to produce the same thing again with a differant face, because no problem we have ever dealt with has changed things down there. I pretty much see things as being like dealing with a weed, where it always grows back until you kill the roots. However since people are involved, a lot of people don't like that perspective.
I'll also say that while Reagan was one of my favorite presidents, I am very much against his taking down "The Berlin Wall". I feel the people who put that there did it for a reason and knew what they were doing at the time. The wall didn't even last an entire generation, and I feel given a couple of generations many of the human issues would have solved themselves as people died off and developed seperatly from that point onward. I understand the moral principles, but to be blunt I do not trust Germany after two world wars. Also I think teaching about World War II improperly caused a lot of people to get some bad ideas about things. See, for all of Germany's "reforms and changes" we saw that between World War I and World War II, Hitler was also not a fringe psycho but massively popular (an international man of the year in fact). There weren't enough Germans to occupy the land he conquered, unlike the movies, he was successful because in taking a lot of those nations the people themselves supported him. It can get very contreversial. One of the reasons why the propaganda campaigns were so intense during the war is because of his popularity. He wasn't a raving monster like is presented (the real clips chosen for propaganda and historical purposes were picked for a reason), he was more akin to "the Devil", extremely charismatic, very likable, and absolutly right about 99.9% of what he said. It's that 0.1% you had to watch out for, and where things got bad, but he was so charismatic and so good at doing things that few people caught up in the war saw it. People who compare unpopular leaders to the guy miss the point entirely.
At any rate, when I look at Germany's new face, their reforms, and everything else, I get this sense of historical Deja Vu (at 35 I was not around during World War II, but I think I learned about it a bit differantly from a lot of the younger generation, and have also done some independant reading). I also find it terrifying how powerful German has become, and how quickly it recovered once that wall went down, which was the point of putting it there to begin with. My mistrust is not based on anything specific that I know they are actually doing, but by precedent, and I think if people learned about Hitler, World War II, The Treaty Of Marsailles (I think I have that right), and other bits in more detail, I think they would be more wary as well.
Apologies for the length, I guess what I'm getting into is a differance in perspective coming from a 1980s childhood compared to a 1990s one. Though understand that I am a lot more right wing, than left wing, as well. I am also "militant" in that I do not believe in the philsophy of "Peace at any price" and instead hold to ideals like "you can either have freedom, or safety, never both" and similar things. I don't think that war can end without a world unity, and even then I believe there will still be violence an conflict, including some happening on a large scale.