Well, "kind" and "completely uncompromising" are kinda mutually exclusive.Kiwibloke said:Why do these traits not go together well?bobknowsall said:Intelligence is not the only defining factor in good leadership. In order for a fascist government to work, you would need a leader who is kind, intelligent, perceptive, and completely uncompromising. Those traits do not go together well.
Well, it's more forgoing the car and using the train system in a nation where cars are fuelled by C-4 instead of petroleum.Kiwibloke said:I agree that fascism with a bad leader would end terribly. However, fascism should not be discounted purely based on the minute possibility of having a bad leader. That would be like not using a motor vehicle purely based on the possibility of having a crash.bobknowsall said:Democracy is inefficient, but democracy with a bad leader does not screw up as badly as fascism with a bad leader. This has been proven many, many times (if you're willing to count certain civilizations as proto-fascists).
D.I.Y. man!War Penguin said:Life sucks, but that's because you're letting suck. DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!
in the end you sounded like the Mighty Conan! i respect that!Ursus Astrorum said:My whole life? Nothing. The majority of my beliefs and personal philosophy have changed over the years simply because I've developed as a person and found my previous assertions to be obsolete and foolish.
As for the ones I've kept the longest and believed in the most: Materialism is attempting to take the easy path to happiness by paving it with trinkets; Appearance, while somewhat important, is nothing without a good mind and personality to power it; Contentment and experience are the measure of a man's success, not wealth or glory; Find the little things in life; find life in the little things; Love is an ideal, but an attainable one; Spontaneity keeps the world from going grey; Do what you want to, and to hell with anyone that says you can't; The best offense is a good defense, a good defense is not fighting in the first place.
There are likely a good many more, but I don't really have them written down.
Ya that and a park. Closest thing I can think of is be happy.Amberella said:The High School.
Arguably so, but I would not trust any modern politician to know what is best for their nation. Which is a right pity, really.Kiwibloke said:Wouldn't it be better to be uncompromising in doing what's best for the nation?bobknowsall said:Well, "kind" and "completely uncompromising" are kinda mutually exclusive.
And I guess that is entirely a matter of personal opinion, something that you can't really debate. By the sounds of it you would take that risk, but I wouldn't be willing to. And neither of those viewpoints is inherently right or wrong.Kiwibloke said:Well then it boils down to one's opinion on this: Do the potential risks of fascism outweigh the possible benefits that fascism can bring?bobknowsall said:The odds of a bad political leader cropping up are not minute at all. So it's not even that there's a tiny chance that things will go horribly; there's a worryingly large chance.
Woah, calm down. I still hate you. ^_^bobknowsall said:Oh, thanks. Yeah, I just assumed those were both directed at me, so I got a bit defensive. Sorry about that. XDfeather240 said:Oh, that second part was completely separate. I think you're nice and tolerant. I agree with you for the most part too.