Sure, in my mind it´s child pornografy, try and keep that in mind please.RedEyesBlackGamer said:And your perfectly fine with what amounts to a witch hunt to put us away for owning loli art?Danish rage said:Oh...my.... ....well then, go right ahead . But when stuff like this end some of you up in jail and at the bottom of the prison food chain, don´t say society didn´t warn you.NameIsRobertPaulson said:I wank to those pictures. Why? Because I find all animated characters attractive. My lolicon archive is about 100 Megs. My entire hentai (animated porn) archive is about 10 gigs. Rei Ayanami is hot (technically lolicon since she's 14). But does this make me a pedophile? No.Danish rage said:NameIsRobertPaulson said:While you have your rights as a parent to that, the fact remains that no one was hurt in this process, and the law was far overstepped.Danish rage said:Well, i find it fair they judged drawings of minors in sexual context as child pornografy.
Im a dad and a manga reader.
As someone with a fairly large lolicon collection, I find this to be stupidity beyond reason. Am I a pedophile because I have these images? No. I find the idea of doing something like that to an actual human under the age of 16 disgusting, consent or not.
Makes no sense. Why would you have the pictures in the first place?
What do you do with those pictures?, be hornest. No..ok.
In my mind it´s wrong on so many levels to depict children in sexual context, and fortunally im not the only one.