The thing I was worried about the most is that this would be a reactionary and childish program, taking cheap digs at the current state of affairs in our culture. I'm actually surprised that they're presenting a mature and reasoned argument because instead of levying accusations, they are raising important questions:Brawndo said:I await your indignation
1. What does it mean to be a "minority" or "majority?" Is it a numbers thing? A "dominant culture" thing? At what point does the label go away, if at all?
2. Is it fair to continue to segregate these scholarships for minorities while we're still trying to bolster efforts to make the "for all" programs more inclusive?
3. Do "minority-only" scholarships revert us back to the Plessy v. Ferguson "separate but equal" days? If we don't allow "white-only" scholarships, are we enforcing "separate but inequal" instead--in that "minority" students can apply for both, but white students can only apply for one (and are often viewed with lower preference in those!)?