Unfortunately this is that case, I personally will vote lib dem because the other major parties have shown themselves to be incompetent however I have heard my friends saying that the only reason they won't vote lib dem is that "it is throwing away" their vote!tk1989 said:Not many people will vote Lib Dems because they are currently a minority party with no chance of getting a majority; many don't vote for them because they see it as a wasted vote due to the fact that they will not win the election. If everyone that wanted to vote Lib Dem did so they may stand a half chance, but this will never happen and as a result they will not gain a large proportion of the House (at least not in the near future)
You got to it before mefreakyHippo said:Mate get your facts rightthe_hessian said:Here's the crack boys and girls...
Britain was Lib Dem until after WWI. They founded the NHS, the national education system, gave people a national pension, sick pay, dole, and gave women the vote. They did a hell of alot of good. BUT!!! They raised taxes a bit to fund everything... Oh! The Horror! So all the rich folks who had the vote, voted conservative and they were pretty much in power from, lets say 1927 to 1997, 70 years there abouts. Then Labour came into power because Margaret Thatcher f***ed everything up and crippled us, but it still took us another term under John Majour for us to do anything about it. Labour, as in real Labour, have never been in power. Tony Blairs New Labour came into power in 1997, I think, and admitted that they had no memorandum and would be continuing the conservative rule!!!
NHS - founded in 1948 under a Labour government
Pensions - founded in 1910 under a Conservative government
Unemployment Benifit - founded in 1911 under a Conservative government
Womens Sufferage - given in 1928 under a conservative governement
The only one you got there was the introduction of the national education system by a Liberal government in 1870.
Also you say the conservatives were in power from 1927 to 1997. I'm sure the Labour governments of Ramsey MacDonald (1929-31), Clement Attlee (1945-51), Harold Wilson (1964-1970) and James Callaghan (1974-79) would disagree with you. Also the Coalition governments between and during the wars mean that a conservative government has been in power for 34 years since 1927, not quiet the 70 years you claimed.
Sorry but i couldn't let something so incorrect lie.
HA! Only because they had such little choice! They were completely opposed to it[/quote] Even after the demonstration of how important women are to society during the Great War.freakyHippo said:Womens Sufferage - given in 1928 under a conservative governement.
True. I'll probably vote Lib dem when Flash-in-the-pan Gordon calls an election (which will have to be in less than 2 years now) but I don't think they'll win.ViviFFIX said:Unfortunately this is that case, I personally will vote lib dem because the other major parties have shown themselves to be incompetent however I have heard my friends saying that the only reason they won't vote lib dem is that "it is throwing away" their vote!tk1989 said:Not many people will vote Lib Dems because they are currently a minority party with no chance of getting a majority; many don't vote for them because they see it as a wasted vote due to the fact that they will not win the election. If everyone that wanted to vote Lib Dem did so they may stand a half chance, but this will never happen and as a result they will not gain a large proportion of the House (at least not in the near future)
Why don't you quote the whole of FreakyHippo's post? Especially all the parts he pointed out you being wrong.beddo said:HA! Only because they had such little choice! They were completely opposed to itfreakyHippo said:Womens Sufferage - given in 1928 under a conservative governement.
Even after the demonstration of how important women are to society during the Great War.
Offering universal education in the late 19th Century is a lot more impressive than significant resistance to basic democratic rights for women.
To anyone at any age politics is an impenetrable mess. I didn't understand any of it, I only really cared about social justice and civil liberties hence the choice was obvious, Lib Dems.02cfranklin said:I would say.. less victim, more 17 and not giving a $h1t. I can't vote so I can't change anything. I generally try and stay away from political discussions.beddo said:ARGH!!! You're such a victim of propaganda, YOUR taxes will be lower unless you earn more than 100k a year!
Something that your beloved Labour or Conservatives are now following the Lib Dems on.
Everyone who thinks the Conservatives can fix this is an idiot. Anyone who is right wing is an idiot.
Its very simple:beddo said:To anyone at any age politics is an impenetrable mess. I didn't understand any of it, I only really cared about social justice and civil liberties hence the choice was obvious, Lib Dems.02cfranklin said:I would say.. less victim, more 17 and not giving a $h1t. I can't vote so I can't change anything. I generally try and stay away from political discussions.beddo said:ARGH!!! You're such a victim of propaganda, YOUR taxes will be lower unless you earn more than 100k a year!
Something that your beloved Labour or Conservatives are now following the Lib Dems on.
Everyone who thinks the Conservatives can fix this is an idiot. Anyone who is right wing is an idiot.
Tbh though they all tend to cock it up in the end, something so massive as a government will have endless problems.
FreakyHippo didn't quote me I don't think. I was just commenting on Women's Suffrage after seeing his reply to someone else.Ghostkai said:Why don't you quote the whole of FreakyHippo's post? Especially all the parts he pointed out you being wrong.beddo said:HA! Only because they had such little choice! They were completely opposed to itfreakyHippo said:Womens Sufferage - given in 1928 under a conservative governement.
Even after the demonstration of how important women are to society during the Great War.
Offering universal education in the late 19th Century is a lot more impressive than significant resistance to basic democratic rights for women.
Ahh sorry, my mistake ^_^beddo said:FreakyHippo didn't quote me I don't think. I was just commenting on Women's Suffrage after seeing his reply to someone else.Ghostkai said:Why don't you quote the whole of FreakyHippo's post? Especially all the parts he pointed out you being wrong.beddo said:HA! Only because they had such little choice! They were completely opposed to itfreakyHippo said:Womens Sufferage - given in 1928 under a conservative governement.
Even after the demonstration of how important women are to society during the Great War.
Offering universal education in the late 19th Century is a lot more impressive than significant resistance to basic democratic rights for women.
Sadly, I believe they disbanded in the end.Herbanator said:But, with the increased homogenisation of the political parties, I find myself increasingly convinced that the Official Monster Raving Loony Party is the way to go. They can't do a worse job than Labour, and at least it'll be a laugh.