Why doesn't England go Lib Dem?

Recommended Videos

Fulax

New member
Jul 14, 2008
303
0
0
Labour, Tories, Lib Dems...they're all basically the same; big government, big spending, big taxes, pro-EU.
 

ViviFFIX

New member
Dec 10, 2008
61
0
0
tk1989 said:
Not many people will vote Lib Dems because they are currently a minority party with no chance of getting a majority; many don't vote for them because they see it as a wasted vote due to the fact that they will not win the election. If everyone that wanted to vote Lib Dem did so they may stand a half chance, but this will never happen and as a result they will not gain a large proportion of the House (at least not in the near future)
Unfortunately this is that case, I personally will vote lib dem because the other major parties have shown themselves to be incompetent however I have heard my friends saying that the only reason they won't vote lib dem is that "it is throwing away" their vote!
 

Ghostkai

New member
Jun 14, 2008
1,170
0
0
freakyHippo said:
the_hessian said:
Here's the crack boys and girls...
Britain was Lib Dem until after WWI. They founded the NHS, the national education system, gave people a national pension, sick pay, dole, and gave women the vote. They did a hell of alot of good. BUT!!! They raised taxes a bit to fund everything... Oh! The Horror! So all the rich folks who had the vote, voted conservative and they were pretty much in power from, lets say 1927 to 1997, 70 years there abouts. Then Labour came into power because Margaret Thatcher f***ed everything up and crippled us, but it still took us another term under John Majour for us to do anything about it. Labour, as in real Labour, have never been in power. Tony Blairs New Labour came into power in 1997, I think, and admitted that they had no memorandum and would be continuing the conservative rule!!!
Mate get your facts right

NHS - founded in 1948 under a Labour government
Pensions - founded in 1910 under a Conservative government
Unemployment Benifit - founded in 1911 under a Conservative government
Womens Sufferage - given in 1928 under a conservative governement

The only one you got there was the introduction of the national education system by a Liberal government in 1870.

Also you say the conservatives were in power from 1927 to 1997. I'm sure the Labour governments of Ramsey MacDonald (1929-31), Clement Attlee (1945-51), Harold Wilson (1964-1970) and James Callaghan (1974-79) would disagree with you. Also the Coalition governments between and during the wars mean that a conservative government has been in power for 34 years since 1927, not quiet the 70 years you claimed.

Sorry but i couldn't let something so incorrect lie.
You got to it before me :)
I laughed when I saw all those lies in one paragraph.
I'm voting Tory next election. New Labour is nothing but failure after failure, and Lib Dem's are a joke, whatever policies the other two come up with, they just aim for the middle. Wasted vote.
 

beddo

New member
Dec 12, 2007
1,589
0
0
What annoys me is the stupid Bank of England. For some reason Labour put them in charge of the economy, while they were supposed to be independent they were anything but. They turned out to be completely ineffectual against outrageous economic behaviour by the banks and other financial institutions.

In 2003 they decided to switch the inflation measure from the RPI to the CPI so they didn't have to put interest rates up to control RPI inflation. While this would have reduced growth (basically why they did it) the result was uncontrolled and essentially false 'growth'. We're now experiencing the fallout of this, a recession, or more accurately a correction.

Now we see that they are dropping interest rates to handle the RPI instead of the CPI which they should be doing. while the RPI is at -0.4 (something which the media keep going on about) the CPI is at 2.9%. The target for the CPI is 2% and that should be their target.

Rather than switching inflation measure to fiddle the books they should have been paying attention and regulating. Had they stuck to the RPI they would have increased interest rates and slowed house price rises which all this debt was based on. As they switched to the CPI they should have increased regulations on mortgages and other borrowing.

More importantly they should have been tougher on the amount of levels of liquidity banks had to uphold, they should have been banned from going to wholesale markets for credit. Focusing on stopping short selling, requiring a minimum of 90% LTV for mortgages.

Basically they cocked it up because they were too busy being pushed around by the City and the Government. This is all Labour's fault and the outrageous corruption with the City pushing this false growth and lining MP's pockets.

If you think the conservatives are better then more fool you. They are even more corrupt, taking private jets to go and more the appallingly anti-democratic and highly influential Rupert Murdoch. Feel free to vote them in if you want to see even more corruption to oil the wheels of government.
 

Trivun

Stabat mater dolorosa
Dec 13, 2008
9,831
0
0
Here's how I summed it up the other day. Out of the three main parties in the UK, Labour will always be hated when in government because they do what they think the public wants, then cock it up. The Conservatives will always be hated when in power because they do what is actually right, or appears to be right, but because some high ups lose their lower tax rates and stuff and they get rid of the whole "spending other people's money" sort of thing, they become unpopular. And the Lib Dems will be hated when (if) they ever go into power, because they're a load of crap who nobody gives a flying fuck about.

Basically, the Lib Dems have loads of policies they think are great, but when you look at the fine print the numbers don't add up. A bit like Labour, except the Lib Dems don't try as hard in the popularity contest...
 

beddo

New member
Dec 12, 2007
1,589
0
0
freakyHippo said:
Womens Sufferage - given in 1928 under a conservative governement.
HA! Only because they had such little choice! They were completely opposed to it[/quote] Even after the demonstration of how important women are to society during the Great War.

Offering universal education in the late 19th Century is a lot more impressive than significant resistance to basic democratic rights for women.
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
ViviFFIX said:
tk1989 said:
Not many people will vote Lib Dems because they are currently a minority party with no chance of getting a majority; many don't vote for them because they see it as a wasted vote due to the fact that they will not win the election. If everyone that wanted to vote Lib Dem did so they may stand a half chance, but this will never happen and as a result they will not gain a large proportion of the House (at least not in the near future)
Unfortunately this is that case, I personally will vote lib dem because the other major parties have shown themselves to be incompetent however I have heard my friends saying that the only reason they won't vote lib dem is that "it is throwing away" their vote!
True. I'll probably vote Lib dem when Flash-in-the-pan Gordon calls an election (which will have to be in less than 2 years now) but I don't think they'll win.
 

Ghostkai

New member
Jun 14, 2008
1,170
0
0
beddo said:
freakyHippo said:
Womens Sufferage - given in 1928 under a conservative governement.
HA! Only because they had such little choice! They were completely opposed to it
Even after the demonstration of how important women are to society during the Great War.

Offering universal education in the late 19th Century is a lot more impressive than significant resistance to basic democratic rights for women.
Why don't you quote the whole of FreakyHippo's post? Especially all the parts he pointed out you being wrong.
 

beddo

New member
Dec 12, 2007
1,589
0
0
02cfranklin said:
beddo said:
ARGH!!! You're such a victim of propaganda, YOUR taxes will be lower unless you earn more than 100k a year!

Something that your beloved Labour or Conservatives are now following the Lib Dems on.

Everyone who thinks the Conservatives can fix this is an idiot. Anyone who is right wing is an idiot.
I would say.. less victim, more 17 and not giving a $h1t. I can't vote so I can't change anything. I generally try and stay away from political discussions.
To anyone at any age politics is an impenetrable mess. I didn't understand any of it, I only really cared about social justice and civil liberties hence the choice was obvious, Lib Dems.

Tbh though they all tend to cock it up in the end, something so massive as a government will have endless problems.
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
beddo said:
02cfranklin said:
beddo said:
ARGH!!! You're such a victim of propaganda, YOUR taxes will be lower unless you earn more than 100k a year!

Something that your beloved Labour or Conservatives are now following the Lib Dems on.

Everyone who thinks the Conservatives can fix this is an idiot. Anyone who is right wing is an idiot.
I would say.. less victim, more 17 and not giving a $h1t. I can't vote so I can't change anything. I generally try and stay away from political discussions.
To anyone at any age politics is an impenetrable mess. I didn't understand any of it, I only really cared about social justice and civil liberties hence the choice was obvious, Lib Dems.

Tbh though they all tend to cock it up in the end, something so massive as a government will have endless problems.
Its very simple:

1. Collect votes and make promises.
2. ????
3. Get shouted at for not keeping promises

;)
 

beddo

New member
Dec 12, 2007
1,589
0
0
Ghostkai said:
beddo said:
freakyHippo said:
Womens Sufferage - given in 1928 under a conservative governement.
HA! Only because they had such little choice! They were completely opposed to it
Even after the demonstration of how important women are to society during the Great War.

Offering universal education in the late 19th Century is a lot more impressive than significant resistance to basic democratic rights for women.
Why don't you quote the whole of FreakyHippo's post? Especially all the parts he pointed out you being wrong.
FreakyHippo didn't quote me I don't think. I was just commenting on Women's Suffrage after seeing his reply to someone else.
 

Ghostkai

New member
Jun 14, 2008
1,170
0
0
beddo said:
Ghostkai said:
beddo said:
freakyHippo said:
Womens Sufferage - given in 1928 under a conservative governement.
HA! Only because they had such little choice! They were completely opposed to it
Even after the demonstration of how important women are to society during the Great War.

Offering universal education in the late 19th Century is a lot more impressive than significant resistance to basic democratic rights for women.
Why don't you quote the whole of FreakyHippo's post? Especially all the parts he pointed out you being wrong.
FreakyHippo didn't quote me I don't think. I was just commenting on Women's Suffrage after seeing his reply to someone else.
Ahh sorry, my mistake ^_^
 

johnman

New member
Oct 14, 2008
2,915
0
0
I thought this the other day. the liberals use to be the most important party in England. Why cant they get off their arses and make a push? Nobody likes labour anymore as they are so out of touch and the conversvatives are business boys.
 

Herbanator

New member
Apr 16, 2009
24
0
0
With English politics being what they are, LibDem are the best of a bad bunch, from the top three. Labour are just a farce, the Tories are Tories, so that just leaves LibDem.

But, with the increased homogenisation of the political parties, I find myself increasingly convinced that the Official Monster Raving Loony Party is the way to go. They can't do a worse job than Labour, and at least it'll be a laugh.
 

SenseOfTumour

New member
Jul 11, 2008
4,514
0
0
The big problem is, all the parties will raise taxes, in some way, as has been shown by the Tories constantly bleating about Labour's 'stealth' taxes.

The mistake the Lib Dems keep making is they keep being honest about what they want to do.

Stop it! Lie like a *****, tell everyone lower taxes, better healthcare, you'll throw all the immigrants out, and nuke the french, say anything that gets the Mail and Sun readers on your side, then do what you like once you're in power.

Also part of the problem is, that while I know I liked what either Vince Cable or Nick Clegg said when I heard him on radio, I can't for the life of me remember which one of them it was.

Sadly politics is partly about celebrity and personality, and they shot themself in the foot electing Menzies, presumably after digging him up and performing a ritual, what was he, 83?

Also, it'd be nice if the mooing masses didn't base their whole voting choice on what yesterday's newspaper headlines were, we need to remember that the UK media are notoriously right wing, with the Daily Mail known for going as far as supporting...well, we don't need to invoke Godwin's law, without there being an angry argument going on.

I'll reiterate one of my favourite points about politics and the media however.

If there's a party leader out there, who can improve public services, keep us out of illegal wars, lower taxes, lower crime, and all he wants to do is blow a goat two or three times a week, well, I'm voting for him over the moral 'Family man' who's either a fuckwit or on the take.

I don't much care about someone's sexuality, if they're doing a better job than the guy who's all morally pure. People taking bribes is far more relevant to someone's ability to a job as a politician than who or what they happen to want to stick it in. OF course, these things can leave people open to blackmail, but in my world, they'd be known as a goatblower before getting voted in to fix the country.
 

Doug

New member
Apr 23, 2008
5,205
0
0
Herbanator said:
But, with the increased homogenisation of the political parties, I find myself increasingly convinced that the Official Monster Raving Loony Party is the way to go. They can't do a worse job than Labour, and at least it'll be a laugh.
Sadly, I believe they disbanded in the end.