You sir do not know what the proper definition for animation is. I've seen the statement that the animation sucks plenty of times. The aesthetic of the show is more simple. The character designs aren't overly complex and don't differ greatly from one another beyond stuff like color, hairstyle, eyes. The animation though, which is to say the movement and transitions of the figures, is actually really good though if you watch. It's all very smooth and isn't just heads moving. The bodies look natural in that when they talk the head doesn't just open and close it's mouth. And it doesn't look like everything takes place in two dimensions. The heads move to the left and right while looking around and the bodies move in three dimensions.Housebroken Lunatic said:I beg your pardon, "well-animated"?Thaius said:The result is My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic, a well-animated, well-acted, well-written, funny, creative, friggin' adorable, and just awesome show.
From what I've seen of it, the quality of it's animation actually has LESS quality to it than previous iterations of My Little Pony television series'.
This recent one has this ugly "random shit at Cartoon Network"-quality to it (kind of like The Powerpuff Girls or Dexters Laboratory).
Im not going to argue the other points, but "Well-animated" it is NOT!
Take a look at these two videos. Look closely, beyond the simpler aesthetic of the whole thing. If you have to, mute them while watching if it distracts you so much.
<youtube=UVipLfHLi94>
<youtube=h7PGKcikaGY>
Notice all the little details? The heads shaking back and forth while speaking? The body moving and not just staying still while standing in one place? All the little movements made by each character? That is good animation.