Finally we can agree!Boudica said:Little evidence? You're not going to rewrite my biology textbooks, are you?Hagi said:Not to mention that there's little evidence supporting the claim that men were exclusively hunters and women exclusively home makers. And unless you have a time-machine there's no such evidence to be had.
Well, I agree that you shouldn't fight back, but because I'm a Buddhist, not because of gender.SidheKnight said:My point about the whole deal stands:
Guys shouldn't defend themselves from theft perpetrated by women because it might look to third parties like he is assaulting them.
But given all the crap women have to deal with rape and domestic violence and physical agression, I guess this is expected.
At the end of the day, statistics are only right when they are right and while there's no harm in keeping them in mind, it's not wise to condemn peoples based on them. The people here did what most of us would have done in the situation, but it was ultimately the wrong choice.
Sure sucks to be those witnesses and that guy lol.
BTW, I didn't know buddhism teached people not to fight back.. there are so many buddhist warriors in fiction.
@anthony87: Agreed.