You couldn't be more wrong.Clearing the Eye said:Gender is irrelevant.
http://articles.cnn.com/2012-01-06/justice/justice_rape-definition-revised_1_definition-oral-penetration-sexual-abuse?_s=PM:JUSTICE
http://dailycaller.com/2010/10/05/breast-cancer-receives-much-more-research-funding-publicity-than-prostate-cancer-despite-similar-number-of-victims/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/women-are-more-violent-says-study-622388.html
http://ncfm.org/2009/01/issues/mens-reproductive-rights/
Seriously, I could do this for days. I also have a lot of personal anecdotal experiences, including women that have gotten away with rape and molestation because they were women (as stated by prosecuting attorneys and the office of the AG). Women regularly infantilize and commodify themselves, yet seem offended by being infantilized or commodified. The list just goes on and and on.
There's absolutely no such thing as broad gender neutrality, and in my opinion there should not be. As a heterosexual male, I prefer ladies that are ladies, not as asexual or genderless beings. There is a healthy give and take on both sides that many women I've known have admitted enjoying.
Which reminds me; most of the ugliest things I've ever heard said about women in general were by women themselves. I've known a lot of women that just hate how their gender often behaves or what they get away with. It's fascinating, but more frustrating than anything.