Just because Yatzee said it was good doesn't mean I do. A game, to me, needs more than a graphics update and the ability to dual-wield to be good. But that's just what I think...maybe I am crazy! O_O!!slayer542 said:WHAT?! Common, seriously, Halo 2 was an amazing game! Halo 3's campaign wasn't as good but the multiplayer was VERY good.DivineSin said:Halo 2 and 3 rank right up there with Spore on my list of waste of money games. But the winner, by far, is FF-X2. I can't decide what I hated more, the fact that I bought it at all or the fact that I beat it twice before I took it to gamestop.
Even Yatzee said halo 3 wasn't bad!
Ive heard crazy things but your post blew my mind. I hope your only kidding.
EDIT: I never bought a game that i thought was bad. I'm not kidding.
Ohhh yeah, big time. That was my last Square-Enix game >_<anthony87 said:Star Ocean: Till The End of Time.
It's just bad is all I'm gonna say.
i dno, I adore even the limitedness of Timesplitters.Julianking93 said:Timesplitters.
I got that when it first came out for 80 goddamn dollars and I despised it.
It was also my first PS2 game I bought.
I should have elaborated, it was the DS version. I was not a fan. The original was fun.coleslawghter said:viewtiful joe was a great game, and mario party 6 was awesomeNautical Honors Society said:Hmm where to start:
-Shadow the Hedgehog
-Donkey Konga
-Viewtiful Joe
-Any Mario Party Game
-Jackie Chan Adventures
All of them were purchased between the ages of 5 and 9. I was young and dumb >_>
but if you haven't i would recommend trying viewtiful Joe again
Wow, that's expensive too. I think for me the worst purchase was Legendary on PS3. It seemed like a cool game at some points but at others it didn't have that nice fit and finish feel to it.Cid SilverWing said:59 Euro for Command & Conquer 4.
If I had a friend on multiplayer I would have breezed through that game in literally less than 6 hours. Short as hell, clumsy as hell and just utterly putrid in singleplayer. Its only purpose is multiplayer e-peen growing.
I thought it was 2 bucks? 160 microsoft points or something?NickCaligo42 said:"Mount armor" in the Elder Scrolls: Oblivion. Completely cosmetic, does nothing to gameplay, costs more than $5. Worthless.
i watched that one a few days agoshadow741 said:This one game AVGN did just a few days ago. The game costs 200 dollars with 52 games, most of them are space shooters and none of them are good. Some of them CRASH the game.