Now I'm rusty with my Fallout lore, but I was under the impression that only the United States of America had vaults. Those are from which all the survivors are from. Yes there was the great vault-tek experiments, but for the most part the majority of participants surived those and exited relatively early. It was only 13 and 101 that got sealed up indefinitely. All the raiders, farmer, traders and mercenaries are several generations descended from those original vault dwellers.
I don't really see how there can be series set anywhere other than North America (for the record I'm Australian). Also I don't see why you'd want it. Fallout capitalised very much on combining coldwar Reds under the bed paranoia with 50's predictions of the future. I don't see it being as successful in another area. Don't get me wrong, I'm not adverse to a post apocalyptic game set in London, Buenos Aires or Mozaimbique, I just don't think the Fallout universe is where to set it.
I honestly think Fallout should have ended at Fallout 2 from a story/timeline perspective. That isn't to say they shouldn't make anymore games simply that by the end of Fallout 2, society had really started to successfully pull itself from the gutter. You had Vault City, NCR, San Fran and your player's nation all as fully productive societies that could sustain themselves with food, energy and even replicate technology.
In Fallout 1, people used bottle caps and lived in forts made out of junk, in Fallout 2, they used minted gold coins and lived in cities with forcefields. In Fallout we whiplash back to the first.
Myself I'd love to see a Fallout game about the first year out of the earliest vaults, the bad years before firm settlements and towns got established.
I don't really see how there can be series set anywhere other than North America (for the record I'm Australian). Also I don't see why you'd want it. Fallout capitalised very much on combining coldwar Reds under the bed paranoia with 50's predictions of the future. I don't see it being as successful in another area. Don't get me wrong, I'm not adverse to a post apocalyptic game set in London, Buenos Aires or Mozaimbique, I just don't think the Fallout universe is where to set it.
I honestly think Fallout should have ended at Fallout 2 from a story/timeline perspective. That isn't to say they shouldn't make anymore games simply that by the end of Fallout 2, society had really started to successfully pull itself from the gutter. You had Vault City, NCR, San Fran and your player's nation all as fully productive societies that could sustain themselves with food, energy and even replicate technology.
In Fallout 1, people used bottle caps and lived in forts made out of junk, in Fallout 2, they used minted gold coins and lived in cities with forcefields. In Fallout we whiplash back to the first.
Myself I'd love to see a Fallout game about the first year out of the earliest vaults, the bad years before firm settlements and towns got established.