wow are people that jaded? I am seeing a lot of comments saying how horrible that is. I think it looks gorgeous and the specs seem amazing if they really pull it off. This next gen should have some amazing looking games on console.
OMG!!! GIMMICK!!! DO NOT WANT!!!According to the mag's final 'exposé', the next-gen Xbox - which it speculates is likely to be called simply "Xbox" - will introduce Kinect 2.0, use Blu-ray discs and feature directional audio, a TV output AND input, 'innovative controller' and - at a later stage of the console's life - AR glasses.
Current codename 'Durango' dev kits boast a CPU with "four hardware cores, each divided into four logical cores" and an impressive 8GB of RAM, XBW reports.
Never, but if Forza is any indicator, we'll keep getting half the game we pay for while the rest is held until you pay ransom to access it.AzrealMaximillion said:I'll care when they tell me I don't have to pay for LIVE
The key words being "tech demo". If you're demoing the tech for an engine you hope to one day licence out of course you're going to pour buckets of cash into making it look as sleek and fantastic as you can. You'll burn thousands of work-hours rescripting and tweaking each sequence so that it renders perfectly... You'll spend untold hours pissing about with new features just so you can show them off... You'll work overscale so you can tweak things in downscaling... and so on and so forth. You'll work yourself and everyone else half to death so you can put out a tech demo that makes people go "Holy shit! Can a single computer do that?"Hammeroj said:No, Epic says that because they're full of shit. Not because the statement is completely untrue - it may as well be perfectly true, for all I know;Foolproof said:Is that why Epic estimates it would take them 5 times the amount of money for a current console game to make a PC game like that tech demo they made?
That is becouse the console have worse graphics, and use a lot of tricks like having huge guns on the screen, low FoW and fps and so on.Platypus540 said:Standards for console power are a lot lower than PC. I don't know them off the top of my head, but the 360 and PS3's specs are basically garbage compared to a PC, yet they can play a lot of the same games.cahtush said:My now 5 year old computer is more powerfull than that. :/
Dont really see why everyone is so impressed.
NameIsRobertPaulson said:If you're gonna be forced to swap out parts for expensive new ones every couple years or so, why not just cut out the middle man and get a PC?MorganL4 said:Yeah, this was my thought too......Ultratwinkie said:So its a 4 core with hyper threading?
Not particularly impressed. Even with 8 gigs of ram, which I already have.
I mean really? 8 gig? Sure RIGHT NOW 8 gig is more than what you need to have a good gaming experience.... But the 360 came out 7 years ago.... In 7 years we will all be laughing at the concept of a quad core ( even with hyper threading) with 8 gig.....
They had better think about doing that whole modular thing that was rumored a while back.
People prefer consoles because of the ease of use. You don't need to worry if your new game will run on your Graphics Card or Processor. And it allows developers to make games for one spec, rather than a general idea of what every unique PC has.
DUDE/DUDETTE!!! The 360 is able to do amazing things, such as Witcher 2 at medium level, with .5 Gig of ram and 3 core processor.Ultratwinkie said:So its a 4 core with hyper threading?
Not particularly impressed. Even with 8 gigs of ram, which I already have.
Compared to a PC. But it appears to be quadrupling it's current power, which will leave room for PCs to stretch themselves a bit. Right now, consoles are the lag.Ultratwinkie said:Uh, no.Gorfias said:The 360 is able to do amazing things, such as Witcher 2 at medium level, with .5 Gig of ram and 3 core processor.... As consoles take a leap forward (and this is a giant leap: 3 core to 8 thread, 1/2 Gig RAM to 8) so will PC games.
Because those specs are on par with a minimum spec PC. Hell I have a computer I built last year that has AT LEAST the same power as the Xbox.
Those specs are minimum now, not even high specs. If they were, expect 900-1,000 watt power draw and at LEAST a GTX 650 with 16 gigs and a TB of HDD space.
Those specs WONT make it very far.
What patent doesn't apple own soon enough we will all be forced to pay for iOxygen from appleLoop Stricken said:>Xbox 720 reveal
![]()
Besides, doesn't Apple hold the patent for rounded corners nowadays?
Why only 8GB? Ram is so cheap, I bunged 16GB of DDR3 in my new system and it was the cheapest hardware in the whole build (fans and stuff not included). The system is easily future proofed now.Ultratwinkie said:So its a 4 core with hyper threading?
Not particularly impressed. Even with 8 gigs of ram, which I already have.