your favorite military weapon no longer in service

Recommended Videos

Jinx_Dragon

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,274
0
0
stabnex said:
The Morning Star, AKA: The Skullcracker
It is a flail... thanks to poor fact checking in modern RPGs though people don't seem to know what a morning star actually was and it is often mistaken for this weapon. A morning star is more like a mace, with a solid shaft ending in a large head. But where a mace is blunt the morning star is adorned with spikes. Both Flails and Morning Stars are nice weapons of the era though, if it wasn't for walls of lead death fired from half a km away I would wield this weapon.
 

Jinx_Dragon

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,274
0
0
sneakypenguin said:
Cause it melted. The battery life was too short. Not to mention the thing was heavy.
Pffff, a few minor flaw designs that could so easily be corrected but they go and strap the program. I want my 25mm grenade launching assault rifle!
 

gentleben

New member
Mar 7, 2008
289
0
0
Mosin-Nagant.

There's something elegant about bolt action rifles, the need for accuracy is far more beautiful than the approach of modern weapons where high capacity and rate of fire have replaced elegant simplicity.

It was in production for close to 100 years, with over 36 million being produced, making it the most built firearm, ever.
 

cthulhu257

New member
Jul 24, 2008
470
0
0
Motti said:
cthulhu257 said:
The MG42. Sure, they were German, they were still awesome.
Motti said:
Bren guns, just because they look so badass.
I'm pretty sure there are some newer ones still in use.
Seriously? Who by?
The British used a 7.62mm version called the L4. Just found out they stopped using it in the 90's.
 

GHMonkey

New member
Aug 11, 2009
305
0
0
the F-16 fighter jet. IIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTTTTTTTOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TTTTTTTTHHHHHHHEEEEEEE DANGER ZONE.
 

sneakypenguin

Elite Member
Legacy
Jul 31, 2008
2,804
0
41
Country
usa
Jinx_Dragon said:
sneakypenguin said:
Cause it melted. The battery life was too short. Not to mention the thing was heavy.
Pffff, a few minor flaw designs that could so easily be corrected but they go and strap the program. I want my 25mm grenade launching assault rifle!
Also the grenade launcher was basically a dud on arrival, being more a one trick pony that failed to provide an improvement over existing 40mm rounds. It could have been a decent gun but there are currently too many equal or better alternatives.
 

sneakypenguin

Elite Member
Legacy
Jul 31, 2008
2,804
0
41
Country
usa
GHMonkey said:
the F-16 fighter jet. IIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTTTTTTTOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TTTTTTTTHHHHHHHEEEEEEE DANGER ZONE.
Heh, those things are still workhorses in the USAF I do believe. Hopefully considering USAF doesn't have another duel role fighter other than the 40 year old F15s.
 

Thamous

New member
Sep 23, 2008
396
0
0
GHMonkey said:
the F-16 fighter jet. IIIIIIIIIIIIINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNTTTTTTTTTTTTTTOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO TTTTTTTTHHHHHHHEEEEEEE DANGER ZONE.
Those are still used extensively in the USAF, nice planes but it's time for something better.
 

RooftopAssassin

New member
Sep 13, 2009
356
0
0
M1 Garand [/thread]

If I had to name something else it would probably be the Kar98 or the Springfield rifle. If I had to name one outside of WWII it would defiantly be the Winchester repeater rifles used in the... WTF it wasn't used in any war??? Oh well, it's still fun to look at!
 

Jinx_Dragon

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,274
0
0
sneakypenguin said:
Also the grenade launcher was basically a dud on arrival, being more a one trick pony that failed to provide an improvement over existing 40mm rounds. It could have been a decent gun but there are currently too many equal or better alternatives.
A dud? As a direct fire explosive it would be easier to use then the heavier, lobbed, 40 mm as you just have to point and click.
 

sneakypenguin

Elite Member
Legacy
Jul 31, 2008
2,804
0
41
Country
usa
Jinx_Dragon said:
sneakypenguin said:
Also the grenade launcher was basically a dud on arrival, being more a one trick pony that failed to provide an improvement over existing 40mm rounds. It could have been a decent gun but there are currently too many equal or better alternatives.
A dud? As a direct fire explosive it would be easier to use then the heavier, lobbed, 40 mm as you just have to point and click.
But it's still limited in application then there was the issue of a shell that small being useful, air burst test where not superb and penetration of armor was pretty much identical to the 40. Geez I forgot what gun we are talking about,( XM8?) or that goofy one with the integrated 6(or so) shot grenade launcher.(xm29) if it's the later then as a standard issue rifle its a bit too much of jack of all trades master of none. not to mention a bit on the heavy side.
 

Jinx_Dragon

New member
Jan 19, 2009
1,274
0
0
sneakypenguin said:
But it's still limited in application then there was the issue of a shell that small being useful, air burst test where not superb and penetration of armor was pretty much identical to the 40. Geez I forgot what gun we are talking about,( XM8?) or that goofy one with the integrated 6(or so) shot grenade launcher.(xm29) if it's the later then as a standard issue rifle its a bit too much of jack of all trades master of none. not to mention a bit on the heavy side.
Talking about the grenade itself. I still think it would be a useful armament to have, even if you are right and it becomes a niche grenade it still will likely have a place. If for nothing more then the fact a smaller calibre would allow a larger amount of grenades to be carried then current undercarriage systems allow. The fact you can just fire it towards the enemy without worrying about ballistic fire path all that much is still a nice feature.

Now if metal storm designed a weapon system around it.... Three barrels taking up a little more room then the standard 40mm barrel but holding maybe 12 grenades within that could be fired in rapid procession. That could have a use on the battle field, to lay down a fairly impressive 'kill zone' of explosive noise, shock waves and deadly fragments. As an 'oh shit' weapon it would be devastating. Weight might be a problem in such a design though and while I ponder if it could replace the shotgun, in the same way shrapnel replaced canister shot, I do have doubts it would be an effective 'stand alone' weapon system.

Maybe that is why I want to see it incorporate with a standard rifle, cause by itself it really doesn't offer much more advantage then other grenade launchers on the market, some of which are effective as machine guns! Just hurling grenades instead of bullets. It would have to be a 'option B' system, for when you need fast firing explosive power to just bath a whole area prior to entry or to cover a retreat.

But your right... weight will be an issue with any such system, particularly a tri-barrelled MS system.
 

Souplex

Souplex Killsplosion Awesomegasm
Jul 29, 2008
10,312
0
0
The Halberd. Pretty much the ultimate weapon until guns ruined warfare.
 

sneakypenguin

Elite Member
Legacy
Jul 31, 2008
2,804
0
41
Country
usa
Jinx_Dragon said:
sneakypenguin said:
But it's still limited in application then there was the issue of a shell that small being useful, air burst test where not superb and penetration of armor was pretty much identical to the 40. Geez I forgot what gun we are talking about,( XM8?) or that goofy one with the integrated 6(or so) shot grenade launcher.(xm29) if it's the later then as a standard issue rifle its a bit too much of jack of all trades master of none. not to mention a bit on the heavy side.
Talking about the grenade itself. I still think it would be a useful armament to have, even if you are right and it becomes a niche grenade. If for nothing more then the smaller calibre would allow a larger amount of grenades then current undercarriage systems. The fact you can just fire it towards the enemy without worrying about ballistic fire path all that much is still a nice feature.

Now if metal storm designed a weapon system around it....
O, okay gotcha. T'would be better than then 40mm as you wouldn't have to "lob" the shell, as a stand alone replacement(ie just a stand alone launcher) for the 40 I would like it. Just more accurate shells lighter weight and such. But as far as integration into a rifle(like the xm29 I would hate the weight and negligible performance. IDK what I would think of an underslung launcher though. 25 mm just seems too small.
 

stabnex

New member
Jun 30, 2009
1,039
0
0
Jinx_Dragon said:
stabnex said:
The Morning Star, AKA: The Skullcracker
It is a flail... thanks to poor fact checking in modern RPGs though people don't seem to know what a morning star actually was and it is often mistaken for this weapon. A morning star is more like a mace, with a solid shaft ending in a large head. But where a mace is blunt the morning star is adorned with spikes. Both Flails and Morning Stars are nice weapons of the era though, if it wasn't for walls of lead death fired from half a km away I would wield this weapon.
I saw one of those, but this was the weapon I had in mind and miss the most. Far more deadly when momentum and skill come into play.