You've Created A Nation, Now To Declare War!

Recommended Videos

Vhite

New member
Aug 17, 2009
1,980
0
0
Quaxar said:
Dear Vatican, come at me, bro.

You'd just need something that has a longer range than a halberd. Works even better if you first manage to first release a swarm of locusts and make it rain blood from the skies.
Swiss Guard would actually kick your ass with machine guns and fabulous looks.
 

Baron_Rouge

New member
Oct 30, 2009
511
0
0
Well, it'd have to be Luxembourg! Not that I've got anything against them, but as far as I know they have one of the highest GDPs per capita in the world, one of the smallest armies in the world, and one of the highest amounts of wine consumed annually per capita. This means they're very rich, very drunk, and quite defenceless. I can think of no better country for my fledgling warlike nation to plunder and then add to my empire.

Captcha: Over the top.

Declaring war on a nation with no provocation over the top? Maybe, captcha. Maybe.
 

Elementary - Dear Watson

RIP Eleuthera, I will miss you
Nov 9, 2010
2,980
0
0
Shock and Awe said:
North Korea, make the people think we're some sort of gods, swoop in from the sky and takeover. If the military fights back we bomb them into smithereens over and over until theres none left.

I choose North Korea because I won't have to worry about anyone interfering on their behalf.
You sure about that? I am pretty much certain that China would have something to say about that... And with China come a lot of others inc. Russia!

OT: I would invade any of the central african states... I only want the land as a hunting range, so am going for the easiest targets...

Then I would move onto holiday destinations. But ones with limited numbers of allies, like small islands in the Atlantic and Pacific.... Finally I would take the Falkland Islands... for shits and giggles!
 

The Scotsman72

New member
Aug 8, 2012
32
0
0
Asita said:
The first target is Scotland. My apologies to all the British Isles, but I need to get them before they get me.


See! They're my natural enemies! And everyone else's too! It's a preemptive strike.
Our bagpipes and kilt wearing armies shall destroy all! Or spend another night in the pub first I suppose...
 

Matt King

New member
Mar 15, 2010
551
0
0
well most of the major oil producing middle eastern countries, but i wouldn't do it with solid troops, i would support a coup d'etat with one of my subordinates taking control, after that i would indirectly beef up and support their military to defend themselves then slowly increase oil to ridiculous prices and fake a shortage and then while they are weakened, i would perform severel more inderect takeovers of smaller countries placing my ever loyal subordinates in charge of the smaller nations, while my middle eastern empire would expand into nearby countries, then i would take my forces from my flying nation and unleash temporary emps (if they don't exsist i just made them) and drop them on the first major nation i invaded, let's say america then blitzkrieg them with no deceleration and smash through their capital and afterwards major military bases but then i would take time to secure and better the country so i can take over their military and have the support over their people, then use american recourses to fund the military of my smaller nations, find another major nation rinse repeat
 

Contradiction

New member
May 20, 2009
123
0
0
First take america to make an impression. Then systematically take everything. After that I would disassemble the leadership into tiny provinces destroying all cities. After that I would step out of any leadership, knowing that there are many other people running separate nations now and I would settle down in some village somewhere.

That or take down Sealand WHO DOESN'T want to rule the principality of sea land. That's some prime real estate and besides, they have no allies who will retaliate.
 

ElPatron

New member
Jul 18, 2011
2,130
0
0
Arif_Sohaib said:
So Saddam was actually producing WMDs that the US didn't find? Besides, those things are too costly and are basically white elephants.
Of course they are costly. If you're not spending money on them, nobody would believe that you had them.

Also, the definition of WMD is loose. Saddam had used WMDs on the Kurds and was buying yellow cake uranium. The whole nuclear weapon spiel was a load of bull but we can all agree that there was evidence supporting the belief.

Arif_Sohaib said:
For the revolution, that's where the economy comes in because that would also include making sure the people are happy and a true promise of steeping down if they aren't.
If someone is paying money and indoctrinating people (basically creating a Taliban-esque force) then democracy can go take a hike.

Arif_Sohaib said:
Guns in my actual country only allow ethnic and sectarian violence, I think I will stick with high tech weapons in the hands of rigorously trained, true professionals.
High-tech is useless unless you can use it. 9 weeks do not make people "rigorously trained" nor "professionals". Professional soldiers are still humans - there will be civilians who are more responsible and better shots than most soldiers. They are stupid like humans, they are irresponsible like humans but most of all they bleed like humans.

If your country has ethnic violence, then the people in your country were grown as stupid people. It wouldn't be be guns "allowing" said violence, firearms are inanimate objects incapable of indoctrinating people for violence.
 

ElPatron

New member
Jul 18, 2011
2,130
0
0
theblindedhunter said:
Angry right-wingers become militia forces
"Angry right-wingers"... Right...

If you want to pretend to know about a country, how about you actually read what happens in it instead of believing everything Seth McFarlane puts on his shows?

I am purely centrist and I would join a militia to fight back. I know left-wing people who would defend their country. This was supposed to be a discussion on fictional invasions, not a "let's bash America's right wing" thread.

The militia would be probably using principles of guerrilla fighting to demoralize the enemy and protect the citizens from looters.


theblindedhunter said:
gang leaders become warlords
Say what? Gangs are not like the movies. Gang members will betray anyone for their own profit. It would be impossible for a gang leader to become a warlord with everyone trying to kill him.

Let's not mention that his army of "gangstas" would be such a pathetic force even civilians could fight them.


theblindedhunter said:
Either way, all that hardware is dedicated to infighting, while instead of invading the waiting game is played instead.
After a time, with most of the groups segregated and weakened by said infighting
Or dedicated to build up momentum in terms of protecting the military assets and training civilians to be part of the militia. Instead of segregation, people would try to help as many as they could.

theblindedhunter said:
then the invasion comes: but it isn't an invasion, it is more of a liberation. The individual groups are easily dealt with one by one, and what infrastructure and population that is left is much easier to deal with.
So that's what we're calling it now. "Liberation".

You won't be able to deal with individual groups because people are not that greedy. The people would just get together to defend their country.

This after you fought one of the biggest military forces in the world and somehow be able to not be destroyed by the aircraft carriers and nuclear subs surrounding the US.

The population is not easy to deal with. Again, imagine Afghanistan - but this time imagine every single Afghan hates the US. You'd have to kill at least half of the population to make sure all America has left are pansies. And they wouldn't be easy to find in 10 million square kms.

Invading America is pretty much like invading Russia in Hard Mode.
 

unreal51

New member
Nov 13, 2011
38
0
0
The disney company but I would do it so that noone knew it was "under new management" . I would slowly unpoison or destroy the minds of children depending on how I felt on the day . I would do it by putting decent stuff on the disney channel
 

Ljs1121

New member
Mar 17, 2011
1,113
0
0
The United States. Just for teh l0lzors.

Nah, I'd probably try to find a country with relatively good economy and living conditions, but that would not arouse much suspicion if taken over. Wait a few years, train some new troops, get a good cash flow going, and target someone else.

Hopefully slow and steady would win the race and eventually I or my offspring would become supreme overlord of Earth. :D
 

yuval152

New member
Jul 6, 2011
1,450
0
0
America because I like money and they have alot of resources, and then world domination! [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NisCkxU544c]

Captcha: which one is biggest?my penis obviously.
 

Baldry

New member
Feb 11, 2009
2,412
0
0
I'll go with the UK first, I need to whip them into shape, once I've conquered it I'll begin creating a utopia once the rest of the world sees of good I am they all try to join Baldrystan, eventually the whole world is mine and world peace is achieved. Anyone that doesn't join because they're twats and/or stubborn (looking at you North Korea) will be assimilated by force.
 

theblindedhunter

New member
Jul 8, 2012
143
0
0
ElPatron said:
theblindedhunter said:
Angry right-wingers become militia forces
"Angry right-wingers"... Right...

If you want to pretend to know about a country, how about you actually read what happens in it instead of believing everything Seth McFarlane puts on his shows?

I am purely centrist and I would join a militia to fight back. I know left-wing people who would defend their country. This was supposed to be a discussion on fictional invasions, not a "let's bash America's right wing" thread.
Leaving the rest because it isn't all that important to keep arguing, but I just wanted to clarify:
I didn't mean to imply that "angry right-wingers" would be the only ones getting up and defending their homes. What I was hoping to imply was more along the lines of "angry right-wingers" being a more major part of the infighting, due to the better chance of them being radically individualistic when push came to shove.
If I had any firearms or training, I could say without a doubt that if something did happen (not that I'd ever expect it to, naturally) I'd be gladly putting myself on the line to defend fellow civilians, and I'm certainly not right-wing.
But I wouldn't be one also trying to take the chance to stick it to any government influence around. That's something much more likely to come from aforementioned radicals.

Also, you'd be surprised at how little interest I have in things Seth McFarlane makes, I guess. Though I will say that it pays not to forget that American Center is everyone else's Right.
 

O maestre

New member
Nov 19, 2008
882
0
0
some Caribbean island nation, so i can have a nice place to relax with a private beach cannabis and fruity drinks.

then Switzerland, see how far their neutrality goes and finally Iraq.. not so much for oil or anything, but more so i can pull off a George Bush mission accomplished show.
 

Sneezeguard

New member
Oct 13, 2010
187
0
0
Antarctica! because it's a whole continent (bigger than austrilia) that isn't inhabited and nobody is going to be willing enough to take it back and wage war over it and the technology to inhabit it will probably soon be available.

A whole continent you get start with from scratch with and is the 2nd largest country in the world. With no problems and few people getting upset about it's take over.
 

kommando367

New member
Oct 9, 2008
1,956
0
0
America becuase they are the most likely to help the first nation i would otherwise attack.

I would throw down 1 - 5 spire missiles per state to infect 70 to 95% of the population with the chimera virus before they have a clue what hit them.

With most of the population now turned into grims, they will kill the rest before dieing out and leaving the nation deserted.

Then I systematically destroy the nations one by one while constantly uprgading my missles and anti-missle systems.
 

Quinadin

New member
Oct 8, 2009
151
0
0
I fly around the world for a year looking all cool and steampunky (It's MY imagination and I love steampunk.) Then I take Germany. Convert them to look more 1700s imperialism with steampunk added. After that I go south and take Italy. I then expand west taking all countries up to around the Ukrain. Poland gets semi-autonomy just because their so nice. France and Spain fall next along with much of Northern Africa. I take the Balkans, Turkey, Israel, Iran and Iraq, Saudi Arabia, basically everywhere in the mideast that has oil. Upon completion of that I take over all the land from Poland to the Urals. I think I forgot to grab Denmark so that pretty much finishes off what I wanted.

Welcome to Europe circa. 1780 and with a lot of fancy steampunk added!

EDIT: typographical error neutralized.
 

DazBurger

New member
May 22, 2009
1,339
0
0
irmasterlol said:
I'm fucking looking at you Norway, you son of a *****. Then all those other bullshit Scandinavian countries are going down too, and no amount of death metal can stop me.
D=
What have we Scandinavians ever done to deserve such wrath? Except for our occasional trolling?
 

Porygon-2000

I have a green hat! Why?!
Jul 14, 2010
1,206
0
0
The Swiss! Those cruel, callous neutrals will feel our ODST wrath! Oh, they think they're so smug holed up in their little "mountains," but we'll see how they feel after we just drop ALL THE SOLDIERS on top of them!