I dunno, if they're up in arms over who isn't seen getting killed in trailers for a game that hasn't been released yet and for which little plot info has been given, in a franchise well known for trailers that are intentionally misleading in terms of plot, they might actually be running out of stuff.ShockValue said:Now I guess you people can move onto something else to ***** about.
Are you guys just dense or are you purposely missing the point?McMullen said:I dunno, if they're up in arms over who isn't seen getting killed in trailers for a game that hasn't been released yet and for which little plot info has been given, in a franchise well known for trailers that are intentionally misleading in terms of plot, they might actually be running out of stuff.ShockValue said:Now I guess you people can move onto something else to ***** about.
That or they're looking so hard for reasons to bash the US that they'll jump on anything. I'm not saying there's no reason to bash the US, there's lots, but c'mon guys, you don't have to make stuff up here. You just make yourself and anyone else who's critical of the US look ridiculous. Stick to our questionable foreign policies and our abuse of the concept of legal jurisdiction, or any other of our innumerable real transgressions.
TheKasp said:How did he get that close to two guys facing each other on an open field?
Because of the amazing, cutting-edge, new AI engine, unparalleled in the industry, built into Ubisoft's incredible, ultra-photo-realistic next-gen engine AnvilNext.DugMachine said:Lol how did the guy not notice him sneaking up behind his buddy there?
Fair enough, but given the franchise's history and how little we know about it, it's still absurd to assume anything about the plot from the trailers. The demos and trailers for the first game said nothing about Abstergo, the Animus, or the story taking place in modern times. There were subtle hints, but nothing official.Shpongled said:snip
Actually during the revoluntionary war, the colonial forces where quite anit- the native americans and killed quite a few of them, quite a few notable clans such as the iroquise sided with the British for this reasonHelmholtz Watson said:At the time, they were not committing a genocide against all Native Americans, so your comment is a red herring.Blazing Steel said:Was it also right for the Patriots commit genocide against the native americans at the same time?Helmholtz Watson said:Because the imperialistic British were in the right for forcing their government on the colonies?Artemis923 said:GOOD. I dont want an "ASSASINS FER AMURICA" game. I want people to push the envelope and get past this juvenile "I'm good, you're bad" rut that gaming is in.
This was a war of two evils, so they should be shown equally.
Equally? *looks at African history, Irish history, Indian history, and Chinese history* lol, the two are hardly the same.
As I said before, I'm not saying the patriots were innocent, just that Britain is in no position to claim the moral high ground.Mrcolie5 said:Actually during the revoluntionary war, the colonial forces where quite anit- the native americans and killed quite a few of them, quite a few notable clans such as the iroquise sided with the British for this reasonHelmholtz Watson said:At the time, they were not committing a genocide against all Native Americans, so your comment is a red herring.Blazing Steel said:Was it also right for the Patriots commit genocide against the native americans at the same time?Helmholtz Watson said:Because the imperialistic British were in the right for forcing their government on the colonies?Artemis923 said:GOOD. I dont want an "ASSASINS FER AMURICA" game. I want people to push the envelope and get past this juvenile "I'm good, you're bad" rut that gaming is in.
This was a war of two evils, so they should be shown equally.
Equally? *looks at African history, Irish history, Indian history, and Chinese history* lol, the two are hardly the same.
Have to say i can't argue with any of that, trailers are pretty much always shit. But i can't deny it does worry me when trailers seem to be showing me the exact opposite of what i wanted from a game i'm somewhat looking forward too. Whether it's sensible or not, it's often the only thing we have to go on and i can't help but get somewhat worried and want to discuss it with others.McMullen said:Fair enough, but given the franchise's history and how little we know about it, it's still absurd to assume anything about the plot from the trailers. The demos and trailers for the first game said nothing about Abstergo, the Animus, or the story taking place in modern times. There were subtle hints, but nothing official.Shpongled said:snip
ACII's trailers were more straightforward, but still didn't tell us much about who the bad guys were or their history with Ezio's family.
ACB... was actually pretty much WYSIWYG. Except for the battle in front of the Pantheon that never happened, and how small a role Rodrigo played.
Revelations' trailers implied a lot of things that simply didn't happen, like spending time in Constantinople as Altair, (or spending more than a few minutes as a young Altair, period) or witnessing Ezio's death, or explaining some of the events of previous games.
Bottom line is that you shouldn't assume anything in any trailer for any of these games is canon, which I thought would be obvious, and yet people are assuming so much about the plot from what little we've seen. There was too much vitriol over too little information, and it was facepalm-inducing.
I made this thread because I wanted people to stop complaining about the game being Anti-British.Promethax said:I love the reactions on the first page.
*trailer released w/ British enemies*
"OMG tihs gaem s gonna b compeltly oen-sided adn wil suk werrz teh amurricn enumeez?"
*trailer released w/ Colonial enemies*
"OMFG hoo teh hell cayrz?"
It's very simple, actually. When your in a war, you're not fighting all the time. This must be in a controlled zone, some distance from the frontline where two soldiers happen to be talking, not expecting that nice half injun boy to stab them.DugMachine said:Lol how did the guy not notice him sneaking up behind his buddy there?
As a Brit I hope that if you find anyone of my fellow County men/women who do try to claim the moral high ground, that you rip them a new one because they are beyond stupid. I mean we had the largest Empire in history and we got it by going to other peoples countries, shooting anyone who looked at us funny and then made the survivors our *****. How can anyone claim that we were the good guys? But I do have to say I have never really come accross any Brit doing so. As a people we seem to be good at admiting what major douche nozzles we were back then.Helmholtz Watson said:As I said before, I'm not saying the patriots were innocent, just that Britain is in no position to claim the moral high ground.Mrcolie5 said:Actually during the revoluntionary war, the colonial forces where quite anit- the native americans and killed quite a few of them, quite a few notable clans such as the iroquise sided with the British for this reasonHelmholtz Watson said:At the time, they were not committing a genocide against all Native Americans, so your comment is a red herring.Blazing Steel said:Was it also right for the Patriots commit genocide against the native americans at the same time?Helmholtz Watson said:Because the imperialistic British were in the right for forcing their government on the colonies?Artemis923 said:GOOD. I dont want an "ASSASINS FER AMURICA" game. I want people to push the envelope and get past this juvenile "I'm good, you're bad" rut that gaming is in.
This was a war of two evils, so they should be shown equally.
Equally? *looks at African history, Irish history, Indian history, and Chinese history* lol, the two are hardly the same.