Anti-Child Society

Recommended Videos

ultimateownage

This name was cool in 2008.
Feb 11, 2009
5,346
0
41
The Lesbian Flower said:
In case it's hard to tell, I absolutely loath children. I'm all for the "brat bans" and would take it so much further if I could. I do not plan on ever having kids and decided that when I was very young. I'm anti-baby and anti-children, though not simply because they scream and carry on in public, there's a deeper reason. I'm also anti-parents who couldn't care less about their screaming child. For all those who wish to argue "It's different when you have a kid", there's a reason I don't have a damn kid.
Guess what, you were a fucking kid. Depending on what age you class these 'brats' at, then this website has countless numbers of them. Guess what, most of the time they AREN'T the ones going around and talking in chat speak. As for the younger kids, the half that are brats is entirely the parent's fault and the half that are good kids who just haven't had much life experience yet will grow up to be fine people. You seem to be imagining kids as some sort of entirely different species which shouldn't exist. If we had your stupid fucking 'brat ban' then you probably wouldn't have been here, genius.
 

Angry Camel

New member
Mar 21, 2011
354
0
0
I think people just decide to cram so much into their lives, they simply don't see a way that they could devote time to children of their own. Also, since the world is pretty overpopulated already, this may not be a bad trend.

The main problem I have with any kids are parents that don't exert control over them. If a parent keeps their kid quiet and respectful most of the time (Outbursts are going to happen, they can't help them), he's free to hang around me. Kids that are given an overblown sense of entitlement annoy me more than any others. I heard of a family that got separate XBox 360's for each of their children just because they could not share. I have no idea how these kids will survive in normal society.

I'm not so sure if I'll have kids or not myself. My future wife will probably want them, but the thought of my spawn roaming the planet scares me a bit.
 
Sep 14, 2009
9,073
0
0
Kodachi said:
It's funny. I work with kids all day and while I understand that yes, kids can be annoying, I generally find them still much more... eh let's say mature than the majority of adults I deal with.

I find it disheartening that kids, who haven't had as long of time to develop moral and logical reasoning as adults get "banned" from let's say a restaurant but I can still watch a full grown adult in that same restaurant whine to the waiter/manager that his bill is too high simply because he neglected to either read the price on the menu or add it up properly.

We blame kids for acting like monsters but once the reach some arbitrary age then all that douchebaggery gets re-branded as "thrifty" or "skilled manipulator" or "charismatic". Adults possess all the same traits as kids yet we value them as adults and undermine them as kids? Interesting.
agreed, adults need a quick smack across the back of the head sometimes, they don't act near half as mature as they are supposed to, and when they have kids, it becomes even worse.


It's bad that the child gets blamed for all of it though by some people..
 

Brandon237

New member
Mar 10, 2010
2,959
0
0
GigaHz said:
brandon237 said:
blaqknoise said:
Brat bans? Really?

To be honest, that sounds absolutely pathetic.
Imagine scenario:
You have just paid for yourself and your date to go to an expensive restaurant (not some family restaurant), you have paid plenty for your food and drinks and then a family comes in. They have a small child / baby. No problem. But within 5 minutes, it starts screaming and crying, the parents try to shut it up, it is two tables away, you can hear it clearly. The parents attempts are futile, as they normally are. They stay there for the duration of the rest of your date. You listen to screaming that entire time. Would you be happy with the management of this classy restaurant for allowing this?

Same idea goes for first class on trains and planes.
I have been in a situation similar to this, and in that scenario, the management intervened. They were asked to go outside for a bit, not to leave (at least thats what I assume, because they returned a few minutes later). Needless to say, it cleared up the problem. Then again, while the kid was hollering, I was more focused on my date and it registered as background noise. I only noticed when it stopped.

Child bans aren't necessary. It only serves as convenience for oversensitive prudes. The rest of us can manage just fine, tyvm. Besides, mom's have it hard enough as it is. Now you people want to limit where they can enjoy a meal when their kid needs constant supervision?
And you know how often that is not the case?
I have had the same scenario many times. And generally there are 1 of 2 outcomes, what you mentioned happens, they come back in, in 5 minutes the baby is crying again. The baby doesn't understand, it isn't going to a lot of the time.
Second scenario, management does nothing. They are too busy / lazy / not present. The child screams, too many parents don't bother to take child outside, blood boils and I want to see a child-shaped soccer ball.

And on an aeroplane for first class, there isn't an "outside" to take the screaming child to.
 

Chemical Alia

New member
Feb 1, 2011
1,658
0
0
In the 70's it was considered practically deviant to say you don't want kids. Our attitudes have changed somewhat now, so more people are free to speak their minds about kids.

I don't hate kids, but I don't particularly like them and I've never even entertained the thought of having them. I know they cry and they're hard to control, but I can't help but feel uncomfortable and agitated around them, especially when they're loud.
 

OmniscientOstrich

New member
Jan 6, 2011
2,879
0
0
Eh, it's not like we're ever going to struggle keeping the population steady. I hate kids and we're overpopulated as it is, or to put it another way:


To clarify, I'm not behind the so called brat bans. Yeah, I hate kids but I don't want to make things harder on parents and it's very rare that some random toddler will come up and bother me at a restaurant or something. I don't give a shit about kids but other people should be free to do what they want without me imposing.
 
Jan 27, 2011
3,740
0
0
I'm not really into the idea of kids either.

Once you have a kid...your life is pretty much over. You have to live for your kids now, not yourself. And it's nonstop work. First you have to de3al with diapers and crying, then with them having trouble with homework and bullies, to HARDER homework and bullies, and then with their rebellious/jaded phase, and THEN hope that you raised them right so that they don't !@#$ up their adulthood.

...Honestly...I reeeeeeally don't think I'll want kids. Not that I hate kids. I like 'em. But I just don't really want one. Besides, gotta stop that overpopulation problem, right?
 

FreakSheet

New member
Jul 16, 2011
389
0
0
I do wonder, the people who impose those "brat bans", do they even think of how the kids feel? What about the legitimately good kids? "I'm sorry Timmy, despite having a perfect year in school, we cannot do anything for it because every place now has brat bans." It's all part of a disturbing trend, like in the Simpsons, "Children are the future, TODAY BELONGS TO ME!" We discriminate against children, babies, and adolescents (perhaps even to a greater extent) and think nothing of it, but we freak out when judgement gets based upon other stuff.

Person 1- "Man that guy is jewish, he must be cheap"
Person 2- "You racist fu**"

Person 1- "That teen must be such an idiotic asshole"
Person 2- "Hahaha yeah..."

We kill the youngest of young, legally. We place high frequency sound generators to keep teens away. We place adult charges on those who aren't even legal realized AS adults. Even in Ontario (maybe all of Canada) we have a law that says no one under 22 can have ANY alcohol in their system. Good law, TERRIBLE execution. Why stop at those under 22? Wouldn't roads be safer if these laws affected all drivers? But they don't, because then the law makers would be affecting themselves. Some schools place metal detectors in the entrances, because Teens must not be trusted. They will shoot us if given the chance.
 

Blaster395

New member
Dec 13, 2009
514
0
0
Overpopulation is not a problem in developed countries where the fertility rate is often below the 2.1 replacement rate that would create a stable population.
 

Versuvius

New member
Apr 30, 2008
803
0
0
Less than the amount of people we have now is a good thing. Too little people is a bad thing, right now the planet is overpopulated if we treat certain areas of land as "do not want to develop it into housing and lose any natural beauty we once had". Also less drain on general resources. yes i am saying too many people are a drain. Less people would still be a drain, but less of a drain with more resources to go around. Whether it will work like that in a capitalist minded society i don't know though. Lots of factors bla bla bla we need to cut about 1-2 billion people out of the equasion slowly. I mean look at David Attenborough. Since he began filming all those decades ago, the worlds population has doubled. That is a scary prospect. No...we need less people. It doesn't mean culls or anything that short sightedly retarded but a trend of less children is...good.
 

Hamish Durie

New member
Apr 30, 2011
1,210
0
0
mabye our natural minds just started thinking
"well spaceflight is going anywhere soon and the world isn't getting any bigger how about we stop having as many children"
 

octafish

New member
Apr 23, 2010
5,137
0
0
Remember if you don't have children, then these children will be the ones changing your adult diapers in your nursing home, or not changing them as the case may be. Better start studying robotics just in case.
 

blaqknoise

New member
Feb 27, 2010
437
0
0
brandon237 said:
blaqknoise said:
Brat bans? Really?

To be honest, that sounds absolutely pathetic.
Imagine scenario:
You have just paid for yourself and your date to go to an expensive restaurant (not some family restaurant), you have paid plenty for your food and drinks and then a family comes in. They have a small child / baby. No problem. But within 5 minutes, it starts screaming and crying, the parents try to shut it up, it is two tables away, you can hear it clearly. The parents attempts are futile, as they normally are. They stay there for the duration of the rest of your date. You listen to screaming that entire time. Would you be happy with the management of this classy restaurant for allowing this?

Same idea goes for first class on trains and planes.
I'm a pretty patient person. I realize that parents may be new parents and might not be sure what to do and how to properly handle that situation. If the baby keeps crying and crying without stopping, then all the parents need to do is take the baby outside until it's quiet enough to bring back in.

For trains, there isn't and outside to go to, so you can take it into the bathroom or somewhere else where there isn't many people. (I've never been on a train so I don't know what's on them)

For planes, suck it up princess. The parents aren't asking the baby to cry and they can only do their best to make it stop.
 

FreakSheet

New member
Jul 16, 2011
389
0
0
octafish said:
Remember if you don't have children, then these children will be the ones changing your adult diapers in your nursing home, or not changing them as the case may be. Better start studying robotics just in case.
In one year ;)

But yeah, children will be the ones taking care of your selfish ass one day, and maybe kids will bear some ill will towards child banning people.
 

Hyper-space

New member
Nov 25, 2008
1,361
0
0
Patrick Young said:
people who want to ban children from things should be shot in the head then*censored* *censored*
I mean why are they under the assumption that every child is a brat??
Because of their lack of perspective and the delicious irony that they were once insufferable assholes as well.

Hell, most of the people who are for brat bans have probable themselves been at one time very disruptive, yet they would probably scoff at the idea of them being banned from restaurants and such.

And all of the talks of reducing the human population can be considered moot seeing as its not the developed countries that have such high birth-rates, barking up the wrong tree, ect. Maybe focusing more on HELPING said underdeveloped countries become first-world would be more productive than say, thinking you were any different than those "brats" you so want banned.
 

Brandon237

New member
Mar 10, 2010
2,959
0
0
blaqknoise said:
brandon237 said:
blaqknoise said:
Brat bans? Really?

To be honest, that sounds absolutely pathetic.
Imagine scenario:
You have just paid for yourself and your date to go to an expensive restaurant (not some family restaurant), you have paid plenty for your food and drinks and then a family comes in. They have a small child / baby. No problem. But within 5 minutes, it starts screaming and crying, the parents try to shut it up, it is two tables away, you can hear it clearly. The parents attempts are futile, as they normally are. They stay there for the duration of the rest of your date. You listen to screaming that entire time. Would you be happy with the management of this classy restaurant for allowing this?

Same idea goes for first class on trains and planes.
I'm a pretty patient person. I realize that parents may be new parents and might not be sure what to do and how to properly handle that situation. If the baby keeps crying and crying without stopping, then all the parents need to do is take the baby outside until it's quiet enough to bring back in.

For trains, there isn't and outside to go to, so you can take it into the bathroom or somewhere else where there isn't many people. (I've never been on a train so I don't know what's on them)

For planes, suck it up princess. The parents aren't asking the baby to cry and they can only do their best to make it stop.
I would rather parents sorted their child out straight away as opposed to banning them from classier places, but the fact is that many parents don't even bother, and many who do don't succeed, and since that is only getting worse, I see this as the next best option.

I only want them out of Classy, expensive areas. I fully understand the noise at a family restaurant or second class seating, but DO NOT bring that screaming baby near people who are paying larger amounts of money for a quality experience, because you are then ruining that for them, which is selfish and bad for business. With first class et cetera, you are paying partly for the luxury and experience, not just the trip. A crying baby in your cabin / restaurant completely ruins said luxury and experience. I can handle them as distant background noise, or if I am having a quick, cheap meal / trip et cetera, but in the same restaurant that charges double for service and and luxury, will lead to explosively bad results.
 

Jakub324

New member
Jan 23, 2011
1,339
0
0
If everyone hated kids, there would be no humanity, damn it! We need kids, no matter how annoying they might be.