Apologize on behalf of your country

Recommended Videos

AWDMANOUT

New member
Jan 4, 2010
838
0
0
Hah! A sorry thread started by a Canadian. You can't make this stuff up.

I apologize for Texas (because people in other countries usually like you more if you say you're from Texas, not America) and our harboring of this man:

http://www.cosmomovieawards.com/actors/images/georgebush.jpg
 

Drmonstereater

New member
Feb 5, 2010
29
0
0
As an American I apologize for Michael Bay. More specifically, though, the Transformers series directed by Michael Bay.
 

Gudrests

New member
Mar 29, 2010
1,204
0
0
Mr.Mattress said:
As an American: I am sorry you all suck! Hard!![/joke]

IASN: I am sorry for Several Horrible Movies, Several Worse Politicians, and basically taking all Credit for winning WWII (I know you Brits and You Commies Helped us out!).
^ agreed...im sorry we are just THAT awesome. I mean...yeah we did gain independence from the most powerful country at the time...and then again....i mean yeah were a little cocky...but...common...god is on our side (kind of a joke look at what happened to the enemy troops after the war of 1812 when they burnt down the white house....god himself killed most of them
 
Jun 11, 2008
5,331
0
0
Rathcoole said:
I did read your whole post. But I do not deal in rumours. Lets take this arugment back to the point. You refuse to say sorry to England because you think they started the troubles. The fact is England conquered and ruled in a time when it was a prefectly acceptable thing to do. They later returned the lands that asked to leave, only keeping the ones that wanted to stay. (decades before they release India, Pakastan and countless others) But nationalist palamiltiers decided they wanted the whole lot despite what the majority in the north wanted. They started attacks against innocent people who just wanted to live there lives in peace. The English guvorment did what anybody would in that sitution they defended there land.


I suspect we will never reach an agreement. So lets just say you stick to what you believe and I will stick to what I believe.
Yet you also ignore my on topic where I already apologised for the innocent caused by paramilitary groups. So I have not refused to apologise for any innocent deaths military or civilian. No I will never ever agree with you. It is not because I don't agree with the core ideal you have it is that you are singling out the Nationalist side. The Unionists and the British government are as much to blame for the Troubles as the Nationalists and the Republic of Ireland. In fact I also pointed out in my apology that the Irish and British governments could of stepped in much early to initiate the Peace process. I do agree that technically at the time it was their conquered land and they did have a certain right to defend it but their methods times and time again were crude and hamfisted. Their methods only served to fan the flames of hatred on both sides as they never gave a fuck and should of never let Unionist or Nationalist groups have arms.

So just to state again no I am not in complete agreement with you because you have a very biased view of the Troubles. I have never ever even attempted to say either side was lily white and have given atrocities from both sides yet you seem to hold the belief that it was more or less the Nationalist's fault which it wasn't. The fault lies equally with all parties in this regard.
 

Shirokurou

New member
Mar 8, 2010
1,039
0
0
Mr Companion said:
Shirokurou said:
On behalf of Russia, sorry for being so scary (it's unintentional).
I love scary Russia! If I were Russian, I would be patriotic as hell. England is fine, but Russia is a frosty powerhouse, driven by willpower and oil. Scary is all part of its charm.
Oh I'm patriotic of it alright.
За Русь-Матушку.
 

Rainboq

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2009
16,620
0
41
Veloxe said:
Damnit! Ninja'd by the op...ummm sorry for...ah screw it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCcHCxvnnP8
We should apologize for Quebec.

OT: SORRY FOR QUEBEC!
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
I'm mexican but I don't know what to apologize for, except maybe our awesome drugs americans just can't seem to stop buying, for some reason.
 

MaVeN1337

New member
Feb 19, 2009
438
0
0
America: Sorry for being a huge corrupt diseased worthless pile of garbage that every other country has had the displeasure of sharing a planet with. Sorry for starting unnecessary wars and ruining the lives of families by sending there loved ones out to war. Sorry for shitting all over the atmosphere, burning holes in the o-zone layer and murdering copious amounts of trees.

Shall I go on?
 

Kirch Libre

New member
Jun 22, 2010
122
0
0
I Kirch Libre on the behalf of the United States of America hereby acknowledges that we are an ass-backwards-bat-shit-insane-hypocritical upstart of a country. I humbly apologize for our psychotic behavior and any future transgressions that will be committed.

Also because of my dual citizenship on behalf of Jamaica I apologize for the rampant homophobia. It's very depressing that such a beautiful county can be so disgusting.
 

Rathcoole

New member
Jan 1, 2011
135
0
0
Glademaster said:
Rathcoole said:
I did read your whole post. But I do not deal in rumours. Lets take this arugment back to the point. You refuse to say sorry to England because you think they started the troubles. The fact is England conquered and ruled in a time when it was a prefectly acceptable thing to do. They later returned the lands that asked to leave, only keeping the ones that wanted to stay. (decades before they release India, Pakastan and countless others) But nationalist palamiltiers decided they wanted the whole lot despite what the majority in the north wanted. They started attacks against innocent people who just wanted to live there lives in peace. The English guvorment did what anybody would in that sitution they defended there land.


I suspect we will never reach an agreement. So lets just say you stick to what you believe and I will stick to what I believe.
Yet you also ignore my on topic where I already apologised for the innocent caused by paramilitary groups. So I have not refused to apologise for any innocent deaths military or civilian. No I will never ever agree with you. It is not because I don't agree with the core ideal you have it is that you are singling out the Nationalist side. The Unionists and the British government are as much to blame for the Troubles as the Nationalists and the Republic of Ireland. In fact I also pointed out in my apology that the Irish and British governments could of stepped in much early to initiate the Peace process. I do agree that technically at the time it was their conquered land and they did have a certain right to defend it but their methods times and time again were crude and hamfisted. Their methods only served to fan the flames of hatred on both sides as they never gave a fuck and should of never let Unionist or Nationalist groups have arms.

So just to state again no I am not in complete agreement with you because you have a very biased view of the Troubles. I have never ever even attempted to say either side was lily white and have given atrocities from both sides yet you seem to hold the belief that it was more or less the Nationalist's fault which it wasn't. The fault lies equally with all parties in this regard.


I think you have misunderstood my entire point I will explain my side.

I believe the troubles where started by a small group of nutters trying to reclaim all of ireland for the republic.

The unionalist side having more than a few nutters people of it's own hit back. England was forced to intervene in what it say as a threat to it's lands. Which only further annoys the nationalists. They got angry at what they see as interference in their affairs. which only caused the whole thing to get worse.

Both sides start to attack the other and England is forced to intervene more and more. The more attacks the more England intervenes, the more england intervenes the more the attacks happen. It was a never ending circle of pointless violence and where did it get us?

What if instead of retailiating the unionists had simple ignored the threat? it probably would have died out from lack of support. But because we attacked back we helped escalate the conflict and grow the support for the nutters on the nationalists. Which in turn grow the support for the nutters on the unionalist side. The unionalists are just as guilty as the Nationalists. But I do not accept that it was Englands fault it started.

They where only involved because we where tearing ourselves apart. If it had not been for them we would probably still be killing each other over a stupid war, started by stupid people. That should have died out long before it got to the point it did.
 
Jun 11, 2008
5,331
0
0
Rathcoole said:
Yes England was forced to intervene when they should of intervened much sooner with the help of the Republic. It would of looked bad on them if they didn't intervene and they did a piss poor job of invetervention(Eg Guildford 4, that little incident in Croke Park, not disarming Unionists and Nationalists) as it was way too late and it had already spun out of control. The Troubles were not started by one group. They were started by years of dissent that was encouraged on both sides. In fact if I remember my history right might have to dig up my Junior Cert book to check this the Unionists armed themselves first before the start of the Troubles. Does that mean they started it? No. The blame for the Troubles rests on both sides as I already said and it is soemthing you don't seem willing even accept.
 

hellsdinner

New member
Apr 4, 2010
57
0
0
ON BEHALF OF THE SMAL BUT STILL AWESOME COUNTRY OF BELGIUM
I APOLOGIZE FOR OUR REALLY EXPENSIVE BEER WITCH IS ACTUALLY PRETTY CHEAP IN BELGIUM BUT NOT IN AMERICA.
 

Kirky

New member
Oct 30, 2008
112
0
0
On the behalf of my now dead countrymen, the empire-builders, I apologise for taking over three quarters of the world and making English such a widely known and spoken language.

Oh, and I apologise for creating America as we know it. Our bad. ;)
 

Rathcoole

New member
Jan 1, 2011
135
0
0
Glademaster said:
Rathcoole said:
Yes England was forced to intervene when they should of intervened much sooner with the help of the Republic. It would of looked bad on them if they didn't intervene and they did a piss poor job of invetervention(Eg Guildford 4, that little incident in Croke Park, not disarming Unionists and Nationalists) as it was way too late and it had already spun out of control. The Troubles were not started by one group. They were started by years of dissent that was encouraged on both sides. In fact if I remember my history right might have to dig up my Junior Cert book to check this the Unionists armed themselves first before the start of the Troubles. Does that mean they started it? No. The blame for the Troubles rests on both sides as I already said and it is soemthing you don't seem willing even accept.


I do accept that it was the fault of both sides read what I wrote. Both sides are just as guilty for letting it get to the point it did. I do not blame the common people on either side if you read what I said. The war started because of small groups of nutters on both sides of the conflict. People who took petty disputes and used it as an excuse for killing thousands of people.
 

Salem_Wolf

New member
Jul 9, 2009
417
0
0
I don't care how many times this was said, this needs to be apologized for again.

On behalf of America, I apologize for Stephanie Meyer and her Twilight series. This especially goes for Japan, who found their own Hideo Kojima corrupted by it. Mr. Kojima, I promise you that Twilight does not show our level of writing potential and ability, this does not accurately showcase our talent. I wouldn't be offended if you thought that though.

I'm sorry again.