PowCoJG said:
Alright, I'm noticing a trend lately. "Adult" Literature (No, not pornographic) seems to be depicting teens, anywhere from 14-19, as either sex-crazed or buying drugs.
Now, I'm not normally one to complain, but I can see where this is going to lead. Parents who read these books are going to become paranoid. They will try to match any sort of pattern in the book with their child's life, and then condemn them for it. Now I'm not saying there aren't teens that do this, but think about it. How many times do you see a teen in the news for something other than this kind of behavior? This is going to lead to the same kind of paranoia that will cause parents to suffocate their kids, instead of letting them experience life for themselves.
Why am I complaining about this? My mom thinks I'm going to have sex with my girlfriend every chance I get these days. All because she read The Tenth Circle by Jodi Piccoult. It depicts the kids drinking and having a rainbow party.
Feel free to shoot me down now.
Thank,
JGreg
You do realize that the "adults" in question are mostly Baby Boomers, right? (though I can't speak for your mom). Generation X never came into it's own due to the lifespans of the Boomers and got skipped over, and generally aren't a force (this is my Generation incidently).
The Boomers mostly grew up during the 1960s and 1970s when youth culture was all about sex and drugs. Hippies were very much into "free love" (bi-sexual sex), and drugs. They also grew up to take over for their parents generation when they grew old and thus never had the same issues that Generation X does about not having a future because all the good jobs are already occupied.
Given the nilhistic outlook of Generation X, the behavior of the adults themselves when they were younger (whether they admit it or not), the decimation of 60s and 70s icons due to their lifestyles, and other things, a lot of adults simply assume that kids behave a lot like they did when they were younger, but with a much larger dose of Angst and depression. What's more this is actually true.
The thing is though that when people grow up they put things into a differant perspective and look at the results of what their former youth lifestyle did, and want to protect their children from it, without realizing that they both didn't listen, and didn't care. I think the ironic thing is that today's youth is dealing with an adult generation that is more aware of them and what they can/will do than the generation that came before them.
The current media technology also means that when things to extremely wrong, people tend to hear about it a lot more than they used to.
There is also what I'd call a "propaganda backfire" in force. Baby Boomers got really into "civil liberties" and fueled a lot of the current gay rights stuff, including the "education" which includes in some places (but not all) the implication that everyone is inherantly bi-sexual and anyone who doesn't embrace it is "repressed, and ignorant", and so on. Pretty much an attitude right out of the 60s.
Of course a lot of the people who came up with things like this think differantly when they consider the thought of their kids getting involved in orgies, experimenting with sex the way some people did in the 60s, and doing drugs. Basically it's a fine principle, but they don't want it in their back yard/personal life any more. Ironic on a lot of levels.
My first thought would be not so much the book she's using an an excuse, but what your mother might have done when she was younger, and how it turned out for her. Oddly most kids don't query their parents about their youthful sex habits and vices.
Agree or disagree, but that's my thoughts.
I think there is a lot of truth to the stereotype of "wild youth" in any generation. I think this generation and the one before it are wilder than most for their own reasons, but the elder generation is feeling the effects and a bit concerned about their children.
When it comes to teen on teen sex, I'm one of those people who encourages distributing condoms and birth control for free in school, as opposed to suggesting abstinance which I feel is a lost cause. However by the same token I don't think it's a good idea to actively *encourage* kids to experiment sexually, and oddly I feel that is what a lot of gay rights stuff aimed at kids does, though it can vary with the teacher. I'm personally anti-gay men, but I've sat through a LOT of these classes/speechs (mandatory) over the years (but to be fair, as I've said they DO vary).