There is really no equivalence between the left and the right. There is no liberal version of Glenn Beck, for example. The left has nowhere near the amount of dishonesty, hatred, and factual errors the right has. This type of thinking--"well the far right is crazy so there must be someone just as crazy on the left!!!"--ends up going nowhere and is the laziest way to take a political stance. This Southpark style argument that the insanity is split equally between both aisles is crap and basically what I'm trying to say is pick a side and stick with it.iTeamKill said:Please... Like watching CNN makes you a step above fox. One is a conservative psychopath set on riding the world of non-'Mericans, the other are capricious liberals lost in their own inflated sense of self worth. Both sides are assholes. The person screaming that everyone who doesn't support gay marriage is a gay basher is just as bad as the person calling a girl who gets an abortion a murderer. Both sides of the story have a solid argument and neither liberals or conservatives are willing to listen to the other half.Nurb said:A PERSON can be intelligent and reasonable, but people in groups are stupid, easily manipulated and barely above a herd of animals.
just look at those who watch fox news!
Ba-zing!Nurb said:A PERSON can be intelligent and reasonable, but people in groups are stupid, easily manipulated and barely above a herd of animals.
just look at those who watch fox news!
The natural tendency at one and a half years old is to experiment and try new things. Babies don't chew up paintings and throw food on the walls with malicious intent, and if you really think your nephew is out to tear apart your library because he doesn't want you to be able to read then I don't know what to say.canadamus_prime said:And don't forget destructive. If you ever watch a baby left to his/her own devices, his/her natural tenancy is to break, or at least try to break, whatever he/she happens to get into. That's why I always get nervous when my sister and parents let my 1 and a half year old nephew get into absolutely everything.TheNumber1Zero said:humans are born with tears in their eyes and are demanding with no consideration for others into it is hammered into them by the ones they tormented.we are born stupid,rude,uncaring and with sin(I havee areligion so I thought I'd throw that in)Ahhpple said:Neither. Humans are naturally good and are perverted into evil and most every human has the capacity for intelligent thought. hth
Okay, I'll emphasize the fact that you say that humans are 'rulers of Earth'. In that, I'll take it to mean that the particular humans that 'rule' our planet are both stupid and evil.Slick Samurai said:Many people suggest that humans are stupid or evil beings, but are we not vastly more intelligent than any other animal on Earth? Does harming the Earth or other humans make us evil or perhaps just what any other animal in our position would do? Would a carnivore devour a human if it had the chance? Does that make the carnivore evil?
Or perhaps our sense of morality has made us believe that given our position we are, in fact stupid and evil. Acting out against other humans and the Earth out of sheer selfishness, is that not what today's standards considers evil? Or perhaps are standards are nothing more than a sense of morality warped by peers and media?
What do you think? Are humans stupid and evil in their position as rulers of Earth, or are we just acting the way anything else would in our position?
It's usually greed. On its own, religion is a tremendous force for good. Once you factor in human lust for power and money (which happens regrettably often) things turn rotten.gim73 said:Usually the component that makes a leader evil is religion. Once somebody believes everything they do is the command of 'God', then they start to do the real wicked and atrocious stuff.
Are all religious leaders evil? Over a long enough time period, the limit of all religious leaders approaches evil.
Are all religious leaders stupid? This is debatable. One could argue that true stupidity is the essence of faith, in that even in the face of overwhelming factual evidence, you disbelieve anything but what is told to you in the first place. Setting that aside, the possiblity emerges that a religious leader could emerge who was smart enough not to buy the crap he preached. In that case he would not be stupid, just very evil.
I have to agree with him.popdafoo said:Both, really. It's sad but that's really all there is to it.
Love this answer.NeutralDrow said:Yes.