Biggest letdown of 2012 (Movies, Tv, Video Games, Books, Music)

Recommended Videos

Kenbo Slice

Deep In The Willow
Jun 7, 2010
2,706
0
41
Gender
Male
SpiderJerusalem said:
Kenbo Slice said:
SpiderJerusalem said:
Kenbo Slice said:
Th37thTrump3t said:
Kenbo Slice said:
How is Joseph Gordon Levitt's character supposed to become Batman? He has absolutely no training.
Remember when that inheritance lady gave him that duffel bag and said that she liked his real name, which was Robin? He's gonna become Robin or NightWing.
That doesn't make up for the fact he has zero training >.>
He's a cop of quite some time and the movie doesn't make it so that he'll just suddenly the next day go out and be Batman, it leaves the future open as it should: with Batman, as a symbol, continuing.

Really, the complaint about the ending is one of the laziest nitpicks I've heard about the movie so far.
Because the ending sucked? Bruce would never give up being Batman.
1) This is not your original complaint.

2) If by the end of three movies you still don't understand that this iteration of Bruce would leave Batman, then you've majorly missed the point and theme of the entire trilogy and it is more a fault with you than the films themselves.
Those are both complaints that fall into the same category (because they both happen in the ending).

Not once in the first two movies did they imply that Bruce was going to stop being Batman.
 

Dangit2019

New member
Aug 8, 2011
2,449
0
0
Mangles69 said:
Dangit2019 said:
The Dark Knight Rises was pretty much never going to live up to expectations set by the 2nd. The sooner everybody realizes that, the sooner people can enjoy it on a surface level instead of picking it apart.

I would say The Amazing Spider Man. I didn't expect it to be as good as the originals, but damn. How do you take two of the best young actors today and just completely squander them with vapid dialogue that hard?
huh? Two of the best young actors today? Their both trash. The dude was terrible in The Social Network and the broad was horrible in Super Bad....

OT: AC3...so much shitty useless side game bonus mission side quest BS. Money was pointless....Very sad panda.
 

Guitarmasterx7

Day Pig
Mar 16, 2009
3,872
0
0
There wasn't much I was excited about this year ergo not much to be let down by. Dark Knight Rises was pretty bad I guess but I had already assumed the dark knight to be a complete fluke rather than a coherent creation of brilliance, so I expected a mediocre movie and ended up with a bad one which isn't so much of a letdown I guess.

I guess letdown of the year award would go to assassin's creed 3. Maybe it gets better, but you know when you have work to do, and you start trying to find excuses to do other stuff instead? I'm literally doing that to avoid playing that game and I'm debating over whether it's even worth playing or if I should just look up the cutscenes on youtube and save myself the time and curiosity.
 

fraszoid

New member
Oct 26, 2010
17
0
0
Just watched the WWZ Trailer and having read the book I don't see which story this is supposed to be. Much like the Atlas Shrugged Movies, especially Part 1, were it the same movie with a different name I can see it going well.

Speaking of Atlas Shrugged, Part 2 is my biggest disappointment, it never played in Canada and I can't find it to watch anywhere. Have to wait for 2013 to write a good panning review of it.
 

xaszatm

That Voice in Your Head
Sep 4, 2010
1,146
0
0
SpiderJerusalem said:
Kenbo Slice said:
Th37thTrump3t said:
Kenbo Slice said:
How is Joseph Gordon Levitt's character supposed to become Batman? He has absolutely no training.
Remember when that inheritance lady gave him that duffel bag and said that she liked his real name, which was Robin? He's gonna become Robin or NightWing.
That doesn't make up for the fact he has zero training >.>
He's a cop of quite some time and the movie doesn't make it so that he'll just suddenly the next day go out and be Batman, it leaves the future open as it should: with Batman, as a symbol, continuing.

Really, the complaint about the ending is one of the laziest nitpicks I've heard about the movie so far.
Not quoting the other guy as I have a different read from him...at least I hope I do.

Now, you say that complaining about the ending is lazy. I have to disagree on multiple points. On the "Robin" issue itself are a whole can of worms. Now, my main problem with his ending is that it ends with him with access to all of Batman's equipment. The thing is...Blake's not Batman. Now, I'm not saying that he needs to be Bruce Wayne to be Batman, but Blake currently has no way of becoming Batman. Batman has billions of dollars, a brilliant educated mind with engineering and other academic skills, ruthless cunning, the best equipment money can buy, and training from some of the best martial artists including Ra's A Ghoul (sp?). Blake on the other hand? The only thing he could have is cunning. How is he going to get the rest? This plan is doomed from the start. The money was given to his orphanage, not to Blake.

Furthermore, how does Blake know how the equipment works? Sure, Bruce might have left some instructions but he still is a poor fit to fill Batman's heavy shoes. Additionally, Bruce's ending feels...too clean. Yes, that is very nitpicky but work with me for a second. The whole point behind Nolan's Batman Trilogy to me was the concepts of justice and what it costs to uphold them. The first two movies show this well. Batman Begins does it by showing the concept of justice by showing the difference between revenge and justice. The Dark Knight dealt with the costs of upholding justice. Bruce loses his girlfriend, his way out of being Batman, and, eventually, his honor by taking the fall. The third film...gives him a perfect happy ending. He presumably has enough money to live comfortably, a drop-dead gorgeous wife (...I think I have a fetish for her...), and is considered a hero. This in itself would be fine if it didn't clash with the rest of the movie as everyone else sacrificed something, a few even their lives.

Well, I have more problems but those were the two big ones for me in the ending.

OT: Amazing Spider Man...don't get me started. I could write a thesis on what went wrong in that film.
 

xaszatm

That Voice in Your Head
Sep 4, 2010
1,146
0
0
SpiderJerusalem said:
xaszatm said:
SpiderJerusalem said:
Kenbo Slice said:
Th37thTrump3t said:
Kenbo Slice said:
How is Joseph Gordon Levitt's character supposed to become Batman? He has absolutely no training.
Remember when that inheritance lady gave him that duffel bag and said that she liked his real name, which was Robin? He's gonna become Robin or NightWing.
That doesn't make up for the fact he has zero training >.>
He's a cop of quite some time and the movie doesn't make it so that he'll just suddenly the next day go out and be Batman, it leaves the future open as it should: with Batman, as a symbol, continuing.

Really, the complaint about the ending is one of the laziest nitpicks I've heard about the movie so far.
Not quoting the other guy as I have a different read from him...at least I hope I do.

Now, you say that complaining about the ending is lazy. I have to disagree on multiple points. On the "Robin" issue itself are a whole can of worms. Now, my main problem with his ending is that it ends with him with access to all of Batman's equipment. The thing is...Blake's not Batman. Now, I'm not saying that he needs to be Bruce Wayne to be Batman, but Blake currently has no way of becoming Batman. Batman has billions of dollars, a brilliant educated mind with engineering and other academic skills, ruthless cunning, the best equipment money can buy, and training from some of the best martial artists including Ra's A Ghoul (sp?). Blake on the other hand? The only thing he could have is cunning. How is he going to get the rest? This plan is doomed from the start. The money was given to his orphanage, not to Blake.

Furthermore, how does Blake know how the equipment works? Sure, Bruce might have left some instructions but he still is a poor fit to fill Batman's heavy shoes. Additionally, Bruce's ending feels...too clean. Yes, that is very nitpicky but work with me for a second. The whole point behind Nolan's Batman Trilogy to me was the concepts of justice and what it costs to uphold them. The first two movies show this well. Batman Begins does it by showing the concept of justice by showing the difference between revenge and justice. The Dark Knight dealt with the costs of upholding justice. Bruce loses his girlfriend, his way out of being Batman, and, eventually, his honor by taking the fall. The third film...gives him a perfect happy ending. He presumably has enough money to live comfortably, a drop-dead gorgeous wife (...I think I have a fetish for her...), and is considered a hero. This in itself would be fine if it didn't clash with the rest of the movie as everyone else sacrificed something, a few even their lives.

Well, I have more problems but those were the two big ones for me in the ending.

OT: Amazing Spider Man...don't get me started. I could write a thesis on what went wrong in that film.
All of your complaints are such a thorough misreading of the ending and the material in the films that I'm quite confused where to even begin with this.

Suffice to say: the ending is tonally, logically and thematically totally in tune with the rest of the trilogy and complaining about things being "too clean" cements further the misunderstanding of what Nolan and Goyer were setting to achieve.
Alright, I can accept that I misread the ending. I saw the movie more than once (having friends with different work schedules) but it can happen. Could you please explain to me what I am misunderstanding? I'm not mocking you or anything. I'm just curious on what I missed. Everyone else with this similar opinion simply says to me "If you don't understand, I can't help you." I really want to get why people think this movie's ending works as I don't.
 

ServebotFrank

New member
Jul 1, 2010
627
0
0
I actually rather like the Dark Knight Rises. I think it's just one of those movies that was extremely overhyped and led to massive disappointment among people. Mostly this site in particular. I think RedLetterMedia said it best, there are two types of film goers. People who go into a movie and are extremely emotionally connected to the movie and usually walk out going, "That was a damn good movie, there was nothing wrong with it." Then we got people who I think were just disappointed in the movie and were looking for things to hate, though they did pick perfectly valid points to complain about. It was just over done.

Besides, Christopher Nolan's movies at their core have always been about excellent presentation. Inception was a surprisingly simple movie when you got down to it. Man feels guilty for causing his wife's death. The Dark Knight Rises was about Batman picking himself out of his lowest depths (literally at one point.) I guess you can argue that plotholes are forgiven in that regard but I realize I might sound dumb and hypocritical for saying that. In movies without that sort of emotional undertone, I would pick apart the movie and destroy those plotholes.

Was when Bruce Wayne just sorta shows up in Gotham for no real reason what so ever. That was the only moment where I kinda stopped and went, "Wait, how the hell did he get from West Africa to Gotham by himself?" I do get the point of it though, the point isn't HOW he got back, the point is that he's back. Though I see how that might make even the average movie goer stop and question what just happened. Though I think all the stuff the OP said about Blake are good points too.

Lots of movies do have plotholes, Terminator 2, Toy Story, Every James Bond movie, and so on, It doesn't make them bad movies.

OT: I wasn't really let down by anything this year. I didn't really look forward to anything, though I could see the Hobbit letting me down somehow. I did think Prometheus was dumb though. I watched it and I thought the acting and visuals were amazing. However I noticed that the writing was fucking atrocious and brought the whole movie down.
 

Dense_Electric

New member
Jul 29, 2009
615
0
0
And yet, I thought Dark Knight Rises was way better than Dark Knight. Rises at least felt like it had a plot (with an antagonist and a clear goal the movie was building toward), Dark Knight just meandered all over the place and spent way too much time trying to make all these deep statements about the human condition, and as a result just felt like three hours of reading a psychology textbook.

Also, all those plot-holes OP mentioned? Yeah, I could find just as many problems with Dark Knight. What happened to the Joker after Batman dove off the roof to save Rachel? Why the hell was a C-130 allowed to just fly over Chinese airspace (Hong Kong or not)? Why did the police officer just hang out in the cell with the Joker instead of standing on the outside? How did all those other school buses not notice another school bus just drive out of a bank wall?

As for my biggest let down of they year? Good question. I'll let you know when I think of it.
 

triggrhappy94

New member
Apr 24, 2010
3,376
0
0
Um... RE6?
I feel like we could see it coming though.

Great for replays, co-op, and just shooting at stuff while you mildly pay attention. Bad at everything that made the earlier games good.

Also, who names a boss Deborah?! I serious can't take the goo covered, naked woman with massive death tentacles coming out of her back and face seriously. Everytime I hear "Deborah NO!" I think "Take a dump on Deborah's desk. LIKE A BOSS!"

Also Also, ZOMBIE T-REX!!?!

Also Also Also, How can something the size and shape of a normal man, also contain enough flesh and organs to make a zombie T-Rex without having the density of Jupiter!
 

TK421

New member
Apr 16, 2009
826
0
0
Blackdoom said:
Guild Wars 2 I don't know exactly how to describe what is wrong with it but I just don't feel any desire to play it and when I do I just don't feel like I am having fun.
You just described my exact feelings towards Guild Wars 2.
Borderlands 2 also gives me the same type of feeling.
The entirety of the NFL this year was disappointing, esp my team.
Diablo 3 probably would have been, but I just picked it up on a whim without many expectations.
Didn't see any disappointing movies this year. Guess that sums it up.
 

atkndfan92

New member
Sep 26, 2011
6
0
0
In movies I will say that Prometheus is mine. Ridley Scott seems to be very hit and miss as of late, but nothing prepared me for THAT. There was no reason why that movie shouldn't have been great. It had a budget, good actors, a veteran director with many accolades, and was just awful.
 

YCRanger

New member
Jul 31, 2011
120
0
0
People hating on DKR is why we can't have nice things anymore. That movie ruled and you all are wrong. I HAVE SPOKEN.

OT: The Dictator. Good lord what a terrible flick. I was hesitant when I heard it was written by the guys who wrote Eurotrip, one of my top 10 worst movies ever. I thought that Cohen could save it. I was so wrong. In addition to being unfunny it was actively offensive. Not in a oh I'm offended by that politically incorrect joke. As in I'm not laughing and now I'm being made uncomfortable by your terrible attempts at gross out comedy.