Those are both complaints that fall into the same category (because they both happen in the ending).SpiderJerusalem said:1) This is not your original complaint.Kenbo Slice said:Because the ending sucked? Bruce would never give up being Batman.SpiderJerusalem said:He's a cop of quite some time and the movie doesn't make it so that he'll just suddenly the next day go out and be Batman, it leaves the future open as it should: with Batman, as a symbol, continuing.Kenbo Slice said:That doesn't make up for the fact he has zero training >.>Th37thTrump3t said:Remember when that inheritance lady gave him that duffel bag and said that she liked his real name, which was Robin? He's gonna become Robin or NightWing.Kenbo Slice said:How is Joseph Gordon Levitt's character supposed to become Batman? He has absolutely no training.
Really, the complaint about the ending is one of the laziest nitpicks I've heard about the movie so far.
2) If by the end of three movies you still don't understand that this iteration of Bruce would leave Batman, then you've majorly missed the point and theme of the entire trilogy and it is more a fault with you than the films themselves.
Not once in the first two movies did they imply that Bruce was going to stop being Batman.