Doug said:
Flamezdudes said:
While i adore Bioware and could say that i am a fanboy of them, it seems wrong of them to say this.
Mass Effect - Dark beings never seen before come about to destroy all organic life in the galaxy and only 1 man can stop them. (Spectre's as a special class)
Dragon Age - Dark beings from underneath the earth come to destroy the world. Only one type of hero can stop them, Grey Wardens.
Don't get me wrong, i love both games and Bioware so MUCH and can't wait for Mass Effect 2 but they seem a little like hypocrites.
I would point out that the Geth/{Other bad guys I don't want to spoil} behave very differently to the Darkspawn of Dragon Age. Though I do know what you mean, the Bioware games do seem to have a similar 'framework' if you will for the gameplay. But at least that framework includes choices about where you want to take your {insert main character here} throughout their world/story.
Oh, and all the JRPGs I've seen/tried seem to have an almost pedophilic interest in having party characters under the age of consent... I mean, is it just because Japan seems to have that as a cultural thing or what?
Don't know if this has been said already, but I'll give it shot anyway.
I always thought the reason most of the characters were young in JRPGs was because, and this is just a guess because there's no way for me to be sure, that most JRPG fans tend to be of a younger group, therefore making the characters easier to relate too. Then again, this is japan. So who knows?
As for the original post, it always bugs me when people want to change a current genre just to cater to what they want, even though there is already a genre that does what there asking for.
I love Bioware, and if I want to play a game where, I shape what happens, I'll play one of Bioware's games or possibly a different WRPG, but if I want to play a game where I'm told an epic story through a game, I'll play a JRPG. Let's keep verity, by keeping linearity.