Bullying - how far can you go to defend from it?

Recommended Videos

FetaFrosch

New member
Sep 30, 2008
94
0
0
The first shot in the arm is more or less understandable i might would have done the same but the rest isn't. I mean YES they are idiots And they went WAY to far but thats no reason to kill someone.

Also the first shot would have been enough, I mean they were running AWAY!
 

2012 Wont Happen

New member
Aug 12, 2009
4,286
0
0
This is why we need to be able to have guns. If I had a son, and people were doing that to him, and they showed up at my house- I would shoot to kill not just to drive them away. The guy would have totally justified, in my mind, for lining up all of them and executing them if they were trying to break into his house to assault his retarded son.

Let's break that down for a second though:

"Break into his house" If you don't know someone, or worse yet they dislike you, you should not be going into their house.

"to assault" Now, not only are you invading a person's privacy, your doing it to harm someone

"his retarded" It's bad to assault someone, worse to assault someone who probably won't be able to handle themselves as well as most while its occurring.

"son." They attacked his kid.

They should have all died that night, and I think just shooting two of them, one non-fatally, was an exercise of great mercy on the part of the man.
 

Tiny116

The Cheerful Pessimist
May 6, 2009
2,222
0
0
ShredHead said:
Tiny116 said:
Not trying to cause offence here but has anybody noticed the trend of under 18's being pricks and aggressive has risen since Children were given more rights?
I remember it when I was a kid, my friends would be a little shit then shout out at the person they were abusing.
"You can't do SHIT I got RIGHTS!"
they used it as an excuse to be little "Badassess"

EDIT:
imahobbit4062 said:
Also, what exactly does this have to do with Games...?
GTA???
Maybe it's because their parents, the one's that were beaten are so messed up that they're shit at raising kids.
Maybe, though there was evidence to suggest a smack every now and then was good for discipline. But I gather you mean having the absolute shit beaten out of them? then you're probably right.
 

AngloDoom

New member
Aug 2, 2008
2,461
0
0
Shooting a guy as he tried to flee?

That's not quite self-defence. Shooting them on his property is fine, so long as he doesn't shoot to kill when he's obviously in a position of power. He took advantage of that power and killed people in a fit of rage, not righteous fury.

He took it too far.
 

reg42

New member
Mar 18, 2009
5,390
0
0
I was only being bullied once for like half a year, by someone who was my friend for the first half of that year (some friend huh?). After that people made fun of me for being athiest (I went to a Catholic school). It stopped because I left that shitty, bigotted school and went to a school that WON'T kill you for believing something different.
 

Leifur

New member
Oct 17, 2008
37
0
0
The story is actually even more complicated than that. I read a article about it too, which stated that the police did indeed know about all this and that it was going on but never did anything. One of the teenagers who got shot (can't remember which) was actually not a part of the harassing, and was actually just trying to help out his friend (which was the gang leader, but the father didn't know this ofcourse). the gang actually harassed/attacked the family another time AFTER the incident happened too. I very much understand the father, considering that this had been going on for years and not even the police was doing anything about it (the feeling of hoplesness probably was one of the main reasons he reacted as such, or so me thinks atleast).
 

jimduckie

New member
Mar 4, 2009
1,218
0
0
gee this topic is in the wrong form , anyway violence solves nothing unless in the gaming world
 

Mr.Squishy

New member
Apr 14, 2009
1,990
0
0
Leifur said:
The story is actually even more complicated than that. I read a article about it too, which stated that the police did indeed know about all this and that it was going on but never did anything. One of the teenagers who got shot (can't remember which) was actually not a part of the harassing, and was actually just trying to help out his friend (which was the gang leader, but the father didn't know this ofcourse). the gang actually harassed/attacked the family another time AFTER the incident happened too. I very much understand the father, considering that this had been going on for years and not even the police was doing anything about it (the feeling of hoplesness probably was one of the main reasons he reacted as such, or so me thinks atleast).
Oooh..Well, this might sound a bit stupid, but I only managed to skim through the article in my lunch break today and wrote what I remembered clearly..sorry if I was misleading
 
Apr 24, 2008
3,912
0
0
Actions have consequences, if you're dumb enough to doubt it, you're dumb enough to learn it the hard way. I would have shot at them too, doubtful I would kill them, but a gang of assholes holding weapons whilst your wife is out on the driveway?...you're gonna shoot.

We've had similiar groups in my neighbourhood, showing up in parks where children play, zooming about on mopeds. The look on their faces as my dad walked over with my baseball bat and started swinging at their mopeds is one of my most cherished childhood memories.
 

GryffinDarkBreed

New member
Jul 21, 2008
99
0
0
Jenova65 said:
imahobbit4062 said:
Jenova65 said:
Borrowed Time said:
Jenova65 said:
Ultracake said:
That father did the right thing. Perhaps those idiots have learned a life lesson for once.
Lesson for life? How, when one of them is dead? That isn't teaching a life lesson, that is executing someone for bullying!
Though I don't believe he should have hunted down the teen he killed, they were way past the point of bullying when they were on his property with weapons. That is intent to do harm.
Dead! A 15/16 year old is dead! He was already avenged when he shot the child in the arm, surely? That is my point.
ElTigreSantiago said:
Jenova65 said:
Ultracake said:
That father did the right thing. Perhaps those idiots have learned a life lesson for once.
Lesson for life? How, when one of them is dead? That isn't teaching a life lesson, that is executing someone for bullying!
It's a guy that has terrorized your family for the longest time, and then he shows up at your house to take revenge on you. You think you might want to defend yourself?

He didn't need to execute the kid, he should have restrained him after the first shot and called the cops. But as a hunter and gun owner, if people show up on my property that I know are hostile to me, I would do just what this guy did.
That again is my point, the first shot was at the very least, enough. A child is dead. The child might have been an asshole, but death? Community service or boot camp would have been suitable, not death.
15 Year olds are still kids?
Teenagers are very different from Children, He was a teenager, He was a **** nugget, He got what he deserved.
He was a child, and you do not know what his background was maybe he went home after school and got beaten by his dad, maybe he didn't, however by your standards - Bullying = death sentence, I respectfully disagree with you! Many teens are assholes, and go on to be better adults and make right the things they did when they were young!
No, but approaching someone's home with intention to enter and cause potentially lethal harm to the occupants is more than just cause to defend with lethal force, especially considering it was 6 armed young men versus ONE.
 

Baldry

New member
Feb 11, 2009
2,412
0
0
Mr.Squishy said:
The father instinctively shot the closest one in the arm, and followed up in less than a second by shooting the leader, who turned to run away in the back. He crawls to under a tree to try and hide and gather himself again. The boy who was shot in the arm attempted to run away, but the father loaded the shotgun again and chased him down and shot him dead, before breaking down in a fit of angst while the rest of the "gang" fled.
This, this made me smile in a way saying " if only I had a shotgun"

OT: Sure self defence and all that, about time people like that got there cumupence.
 

Aesir23

New member
Jul 2, 2009
2,861
0
0
Let's see, these boys kept harassing the family AND the community as a whole, went to the family's house and obtained weapons weapons (Improvised striking tools) with the intent of either scaring or harming them.

I say the bastards deserved what they got. I'm not normally one for vigilante justice and it's sad that two teenagers died as a result, but these kids brought it upon themselves with their idiotic actions.
 

saphirekosmos

New member
Dec 25, 2008
116
0
0
I say he didn't need to kill the prick. Though I say they all should have taken a shot in the knee or something. What they were doing was beyond wrong, in my book when you start doing what they were you are approaching losing the status of human in my book. The guy was probably blind with rage and on edge from adrenaline so he was not thinking logically. He probably reverted to the "Mother Bear" mentality. At the time all he probably saw was a threat to his family. In that state of mind you don't just scare the threat away, you neutralize it.
 

Neo0MJ

New member
Jan 4, 2010
16
0
0
Leifur said:
the gang actually harassed/attacked the family another time AFTER the incident happened too. I very much understand the father, considering that this had been going on for years and not even the police was doing anything about it (the feeling of hoplesness probably was one of the main reasons he reacted as such, or so me thinks atleast).
That sucks. Got any links to other articles?
 

FROGGEman2

Queen of France
Mar 14, 2009
1,629
0
0
Yeah, I hear about these things, and it's bad. I'd hate it if I lived in a neighbourhood where that kinda thing happened.

imahobbit4062 said:
Irrelevant, but what you are on probation for... is awesome.