All your internet runs from your ISP to one of about 15 Tier 1 providers that connect to each other. The majority of them are owned by companies in the United States.Eykal said:Uh, not really? You don't understand how the internet works do you.asinann said:You know that the president already has the authority this bill "gives" him right? And to top it off, he can at any time order all American web sites shut down for "security reasons." And Canadians, I wouldn't be so smug, most of your internet runs through the U.S. at some point, making any of those sites that run through here subject to the same laws and restrictions.
Or better yet, said fear mongers could look at some Escapist news from April.paulgruberman said:Oddly enough that blog links to a non-alarmist article under the 'alarmed' link in the first sentence. Not to say people shouldn't keep an eye on what your representatives are doing in your name, but instead of jumping to conclusions from a single source who seems to be spinning it to appear as nefarious as possible for whatever reason (sensationalism sells, I suppose), why not read the text of the bill (link under 'proposed' in that CBS blog), and gather analyses from multiple locations.
Screw thet, I'm moving t' South Africa. I already have a decent fake accent from watching District 9 and playing Far Cry 20p3rati0n said:Britain is the bast place to go I guess......... and there goes my life dreams. Now I'll have to have my life dreams in britain and I don't know what to do there!!!MaxTheReaper said:Time to move somewhere else, I guess.
Unfortunately I only speak English...![]()
That's probably the first techno-burn I've seen, ever. Good show.trebach said:All your internet runs from your ISP to one of about 15 Tier 1 providers that connect to each other. The majority of them are owned by companies in the United States.Eykal said:Uh, not really? You don't understand how the internet works do you.asinann said:You know that the president already has the authority this bill "gives" him right? And to top it off, he can at any time order all American web sites shut down for "security reasons." And Canadians, I wouldn't be so smug, most of your internet runs through the U.S. at some point, making any of those sites that run through here subject to the same laws and restrictions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tier_1_network
Why a conspiracy theory? It's a contingency plan in case domestic/international hackers make a huge, cohesive effort to attack our internetz. It's not so they can spy on us, it's so they can protect us and our interests.TheGreatCoolEnergy said:Lolz this sounds like a conspiracy theory. And it wouldn't have much effect anyway. Trying to control the internet would be like trying to control space. And this would be so expensive, tracking down and putting every single hacker in the U.S. on trial
It's fun to pretend we have a choice for longer than the government takes to notice us.IDBash said:The basics of this act are that the government will have full control of the internet in every way shape and form. In 1 years time they will then setup a licensing, certification, and periodic recertification program for cybersecurity professionals. Beginning 3 years after the date of enactment of this Act, it shall be unlawful for any individual to engage in business in the United States, or to be employed in the United States, as a provider of cybersecurity services to any Federal agency or an information system or network designated by the President, or the President's designee, as a critical infrastructure information system or network, who is not licensed and certified under the program.
AKA Government will control ALL public and private IT and Web services giving them effective control of all free enterprise as IT is the heart of Operations of all companies to date.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/08/28/taking_liberties/entry5270834.shtml
Here is the actual bill..
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d111:s.00773:
The law has to be challenged in court after it has been created to be declared unconstitutional.Darrkon Fearlock said:Don't the Americans have some kind of piece of paper that makes this illegal?
With the liberal gooks we have in the supreme court? Hell no... it would be if Bush had gotten to select 2 more good judges like Roberts. Although it actually is against the actual Constitution that was shredded all those years ago.thoraxe5000 said:Isn't this act like TOTALLY against the constitution?