http://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&q=women+are+paid+less+than+men&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=4ea4a308ac696defBlind Sight said:ciortas1 said:Paid less? Mind putting up some studies' results to back up your claim? Because I haven't really heard anything like that.Blind Sight said:snip
Not a problem, always willing to provide sources:
http://www.boston.com/news/health/blog/2010/03/equally_qualifi.html
http://usgovinfo.about.com/cs/censusstatistic/a/womenspay.htm (this one's a little older, from 2002)
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1983185,00.html
Best quote: "Perhaps the most compelling ? and potentially damning ? data of all to suggest that gender has an influence comes from a 2008 study in which University of Chicago sociologist Kristen Schilt and NYU economist Matthew Wiswall examined the wage trajectories of people who underwent a sex change. Their results: even when controlling for factors like education, men who transitioned to women earned, on average, 32% less after the surgery. Women who became men, on the other hand, earned 1.5% more."
Also, no, it's not an assumption, it's documented fact. Bear in mind that women also on average get higher raises then men though.
Behold, how to get sources in favor of women! (I am NOT contradicting you, upon rereading that it sounded like a criticism. The point is, if you google the words "Man" "Women" and "Paid" you get that.
And yes, raises are higher, but more noteworthy is again the unemployment rate.
I know i may sound slightly vague, but then again, thats more the most prolific problem with discussions like this: Phrase one thing in a way that isnt thought out like no other, and your opening yourself up to being called a misogynist. It may not be an assumption as suggested, but the lack of anyone even trying to find any evidence to the contrary is suspicious in itself.