Not saying it wouldn't but the OP specifically suggested trench storming type stuff. Which would make a crap game if it was realistic and an offensively inconsiderate one if played for 'fun'. Britain alone lost almost a million men in that war. Three times that of WWII. I find WWII games a bit offensive at best but seeing the trivialisation of trench warfare would be a bad step for serious gaming.Major Tom said:I've said it before, and I'll say it again: WWI can be made to work. You just have to look outside of the Western Front. There's the Eastern Front [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_Front_(World_War_I)], the Middle East [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Eastern_theatre_of_World_War_I], the Balkans [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balkans_Campaign_(World_War_I)], and even though the Italian Front [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Italian_Campaign_(World_War_I)] did descend into trench warfare, the mountainous terrian could provide enough hard cover to make for some interesting battles. Outside of Italy, all these scenarios provide plenty fluidity for an action based FPS.rossatdi said:F5...F10...F10...F10...F10...F10...fucking Germans!...F10...F10...success you are now in the enemy's trench. You now have 3 days to prepare for the inevitable counter attack that will kill you because the fortifications are set the wrong direction.WW1, up over the trench with 30 buddies, all trying to get to the machine gun nest without getting perforated by enemy bullets.
Yes they could branch out the historical conflicts used but I'd prefer if they used some imagination and that they made war porn that didn't re-enact real deaths.