YukoValis said:Disclaimer: I know these types of posts are frowned upon, but this is made not to troll, and I don't want a flame war. This is an honest question asking for help, and I ask to PLEASE keep it clean.:
It started when I told my religious friend about the whole WBC vs Anon thing.. to my shock he seemed to take the side of WBC, simply because they share the same type of religion (though I don't think he understands what they do different...) suddenly I'm in a 2 hour debate as if I attacked him.. No matter what I said he would yell and start attacking me personally, even on things that had nothing to do with what we were talking about. He just went nuts.
Finally I asked him a simple question.. "Do you think the WBC are part of the same religion as you, yes or no?" I never got an answer, in 20 posts of IM, I got cursing, insulting, straying off topic, but not a single yes or no.
So.. I guess for a lack of better word, Subject "How do you reason with religious people?" and simple (non-stupid) answers?
Honestly, it depends on the culture or subculture in question. To be blunt in many cases you CAN'T reason with them by definition. Various cults, and even the whole situation in The Middle East demonstrate the problem here. You can't for example reason women's sufferage to someone who genuinely believes that women should be surpressed because god tells them to (no matter how it's justified).
In general Americans have adapted to the point of being pretty reasonable. To be honest your not nessicarly going to be able to tell what religion someone follows by looking at them, assuming of course the group in question has assimilated to American society. There are of course exceptions, from people who don't assimilate into society, want to cause trouble, or are just part of a paticular subculture that we have difficulty dealing with due to other principles.
When it comes to WBC, I think Anonymous has generally the right attitude in that they have their right to their opinion, as distasteful as it might be. I personally think they can be dealt with within the existing laws, and have been in the past. As time goes on and awareness of them continues, I think they are going to find a lot more opposition from the authorities within the existing body of law. They still make a lot of noise, but I think they have actually been corraled somewhat compared to their previous antics, which is why they are doing things like baiting Anonymous for attention.
In a society like the USA, we're lucky in that you typically don't have to reason with religious nutjobs unless you really want to.
I will say though that one of the whole issues is that especially when dealing with the left wing, it comes down to their way or the highway just as much. If the other side does't come around to what the left wants, then it's being inherantly unreasonable or whatever. I think that's a problem with a lot of these debates. While it has little to do with the WBC, I myself tend to take the side of religions in a lot of political squabbles, especially those on a small scale. For example I personally think that it's ridiculous that the people of a town can't decide to use their own money to put up Christmas decorations in public places like a park or town green when that's what the overwhelming majority of people want, because it offends a tiny group of residents who aren't Christian/against it, or might be travelling through. As someone who has seen traditions like town tree lighting ceremonies attacked, I have strong feelings on the subject, especially when it's part of the community, and something that in many cases might have been going on before there was even a United States. "OMG, the mayor can't light a star on top of a tree in the town square even if the mayor has been doing that for 300 years, that's religious symbolism and it offends me!". Then people wonder why the US has so little in the way of traditions or our own culture especially nowadays.