I am NOT a donor, am I EDIT: a bad person? EDIT!

Recommended Videos

Virus0015

New member
Dec 1, 2009
186
0
0
Evil? Not quite. A massive cock for abusing the system? Of course!

I wouldn't have a problem with non donors if they signed a contract stating that they should not be entitled to replacements if they needed one. Of course there are people who for medical reasons have organs not fit to donate, and an exception should be granted. As for using religion as an excuse not to donate? Sure, as long as you don't expect one in return, because that also makes you a selfish bastard.
 

Vault Girl

New member
Apr 17, 2010
397
0
0
I'm a donor but i don't think your evil if you aren't. It is a big thing to take in to consideration and a lot of people choose not to, but it doesn't mean their just bad.

I guess it depends on the person, their religion, life view etc. My friend couldn't believe i had to fill out a form telling the NHS (i'm British) what i wanted to give away, and its very hard to stand back and talk about yourself in those terms. My view is i can't take it with me, and i don't think that if God does exist he's going to condemn me because of it, so whatever your reasoning it different for all people.

I think it is slighly hypocritical of someone to not be a donor and still accept a donation, but i don't thing their "Evil" because not everyone can make that kind of decision.
 

Madara XIII

New member
Sep 23, 2010
3,369
0
0
FalloutJack said:
Madara XIII said:
FalloutJack said:
headshotcatcher said:
I am not an organ donor. The only reason being that I feel comfortable with it.

Though if I'd be in danger I would really appreciate getting someone's donor organ..

Am I evil?

Please be objective, I'm just wondering
Mwa ha ha ha, MWA HA HA HA HA HAAA...AAAAHHH HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAA!!!

(The above was Evil Laugh #582.)

No, you're not evil. I am.
Pffft Suuuuuuuuuure and I'm captain Basch fon Ronsenburg of Dalmasca

I'm the evil one here!! For only I can call upon Azethoth to wreak havoc amongst these disgusting creatures called Humans.....MWAHAHAHAHAHA

*Searches pockets*....Um ya got a Cellphone with at least 2000 lightyears of reception?
Greetings Captain! No, sorry. I never carry cellphones. And Azathoth isn't even evil. He is, in fact, entirely mindless with Nyarlathotep being the nigh-omnipotent echo of his soul made manifest to serve the Outer Gods. Most evil cultists look upon those who try to summon Azathoth as CRAZY, since the 'thoth will just bump the planet and it'll EXPLODE.
o_O.....Bah whatthe with the *Gibberish*

I seem to have been bested in a match of wits....Well played old bean.
Fine then, but I still consider my intentions to summon him Evil MWAHAHAHAHA

Nothing better than sweet beautiful Chaos.....Oh hey Azathoth..OH SHIT RUN!!! FORGIVE ME!! I WAS ONLY BLUFFING ABOUT SUMMONING YOOOOOU!!! *Gets Eaten*

 

FalloutJack

Bah weep grah nah neep ninny bom
Nov 20, 2008
15,489
0
0
Madara XIII said:
FalloutJack said:
Madara XIII said:
FalloutJack said:
headshotcatcher said:
I am not an organ donor. The only reason being that I feel comfortable with it.

Though if I'd be in danger I would really appreciate getting someone's donor organ..

Am I evil?

Please be objective, I'm just wondering
Mwa ha ha ha, MWA HA HA HA HA HAAA...AAAAHHH HA HA HA HA HA HAAAAAA!!!

(The above was Evil Laugh #582.)

No, you're not evil. I am.
Pffft Suuuuuuuuuure and I'm captain Basch fon Ronsenburg of Dalmasca

I'm the evil one here!! For only I can call upon Azethoth to wreak havoc amongst these disgusting creatures called Humans.....MWAHAHAHAHAHA

*Searches pockets*....Um ya got a Cellphone with at least 2000 lightyears of reception?
Greetings Captain! No, sorry. I never carry cellphones. And Azathoth isn't even evil. He is, in fact, entirely mindless with Nyarlathotep being the nigh-omnipotent echo of his soul made manifest to serve the Outer Gods. Most evil cultists look upon those who try to summon Azathoth as CRAZY, since the 'thoth will just bump the planet and it'll EXPLODE.
o_O.....Bah whatthe with the *Gibberish*

I seem to have been bested in a match of wits....Well played old bean.
Fine then, but I still consider my intentions to summon him Evil MWAHAHAHAHA

Nothing better than sweet beautiful Chaos.....Oh hey Azathoth..OH SHIT RUN!!! FORGIVE ME!! I WAS ONLY BLUFFING ABOUT SUMMONING YOOOOOU!!! *Gets Eaten*

So yeah. Don't worry, OP. You're not evil. You're surrounded by a legion of malevolent nutcases, but YOU are fine.
 

Madara XIII

New member
Sep 23, 2010
3,369
0
0
zero_blahs said:
Madara XIII said:
zero_blahs said:
Madara XIII said:
voorhees123 said:
If you are not a donor then you are not allowed to receive donor organs. Seems fair to me. Why can't that not be a law? Maybe they should make everyone a donor by law, but you have to opt out. If you decide you do not want to donate, then you are screwed if you need a transplant. :)

What about people who can't donate organs due to their frail state or failing? Should we deny them an organ?


Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeah NO. There's a reason BS like this isn't implemented. Honestly let people decide how to distribute THEIR body parts.
so it would block people from going well now that i need this organ im going to sign this card then unsign it?
No, what I'm saying is that if someone wants to DONATE (keyword) their organs then fine. But if someone doesn't then there's no reason we should persecute them for it! Who are we to say how they go about it!?

Either way this goes to show that you shouldn't force society on such a decision. I mean don't we have Ownership of our own body? If not then by God this only proves that humans are indeed the most twisted things to ever walk this earth.
Your not being persecuted though you wouldnt get the organ because you were selfish with your own so you pass away with your organs all safe inside you.
That's the thing right there!! To say I'm selfish!! As if everyone knew me! Was Mother Teresa Selfish because she didn't donate her organs, but gave all of her worldly possessions up to help those in need!? NO!
I plan to give all my material possessions away when I die, but to not give my organs is selfish?! See people are only looking at one side of the coin and don't stop and think that maybe there's a good reason as to why they don't donate their organs.
 

zero_blahs

New member
Nov 26, 2009
36
0
0
Madara XIII said:
zero_blahs said:
Madara XIII said:
zero_blahs said:
Madara XIII said:
voorhees123 said:
If you are not a donor then you are not allowed to receive donor organs. Seems fair to me. Why can't that not be a law? Maybe they should make everyone a donor by law, but you have to opt out. If you decide you do not want to donate, then you are screwed if you need a transplant. :)

What about people who can't donate organs due to their frail state or failing? Should we deny them an organ?


Yeeeeeeeeeeeeeah NO. There's a reason BS like this isn't implemented. Honestly let people decide how to distribute THEIR body parts.
so it would block people from going well now that i need this organ im going to sign this card then unsign it?
No, what I'm saying is that if someone wants to DONATE (keyword) their organs then fine. But if someone doesn't then there's no reason we should persecute them for it! Who are we to say how they go about it!?

Either way this goes to show that you shouldn't force society on such a decision. I mean don't we have Ownership of our own body? If not then by God this only proves that humans are indeed the most twisted things to ever walk this earth.
Your not being persecuted though you wouldnt get the organ because you were selfish with your own so you pass away with your organs all safe inside you.
That's the thing right there!! To say I'm selfish!! As if everyone knew me! Was Mother Teresa Selfish because she didn't donate her organs, but gave all of her worldly possessions up to help those in need!? NO!
I plan to give all my material possessions away when I die, but to not give my organs is selfish?! See people are only looking at one side of the coin and don't stop and think that maybe there's a good reason as to why they don't donate their organs.
fine just change selfish to kept your own to yourself.
 

Celtic_Kerr

New member
May 21, 2010
2,166
0
0
NeuroticDogDad said:
Celtic_Kerr said:
Why does everyone take what I say so far from context?

Wood is natural, beavers are nature's pets, YES! It is natural. I was born with my organ within my body. I would like to die and decompose as such. THat is my current wish. These are my current thoughts. If I chose to have my life saved through organ transplants, I'll sign my own bloody donor card.

However, taking organs from one man's body and placing them in another's is articifical. Rather than dying, you are taking organs from someone's dead body, keeping them stored on ice, and then using them to keep someone alive when "Their time has come". Those are my beliefs.

You have anti-inflammitories to stop swelling, anti-biotics to stop infection, Ny-Quill to help with congestion and colds, Tylenol for headaches, pain killers for other pains, Vicodin, morphine. When I had my whisdom teeth removed, I used vicodin for two days, and then rode out the pain naturally because I hated the idea of using a man-made creation of medicine to over-ride a natural pain that came from ripping 4 teeth out of my mouth that would have caused me pain for the rest of my life (they were growing sideways towards my jaw-bone).

Your metaphor for a cast is rather vein. When did I say I would never undergo such a treatment? Read ALL my posts before you respond on one, especially if an explanatory post comes after the one you quote. A cast is VERY different from cutting open a dead body and removing organs
I do apologise because I don't think it was clear in my post but I'm not trying to say you're wrong or even necessarily change your mind but to understand you because it's quite obvious that the way we think isn't the same. Don't get excited, angry or frustrated, I'm not misquoting or taking things out of context intentionally and unfortunately I don't have the time or short term memory to either go through all your posts again and again or remember them one time through but I'm trying my best.

In the artificial/natural statement and indeed the cast analogy I'm merely trying to provide a context to your statements. It appears you selectively choose what you're comfortable with without a clear trend as to the natural or artificial.
Organ transplants are artificial and you're not comfortable with them but a cast is artificial and you would be ok with it?
Both the dental procedure you underwent and the vicodin are artificial and you were ok with one but not the other?

You also didn't explain why you considered the dam natural and organ transplants unnatural. Both are simply creations of creatures of the earth. "Artifical" simply means made by man, man being part of nature.
In fact, I never understood why artificial and natural are antonyms. Have you got any opinions on why that is?

As a side note, should we continue in this off-topic way or should I create a specific thread for this discussion?
Think of it this way. The human body was created to stop in the middle of a forest and drink swamp water. We used to be able to digest SWAMP water like it was filtered crystal clear sping water. Now men are ebing told you have to drink mineral bottled water because it's all that's good for you. It's against the way the human body was designed.

A beaver builds a dam in order to create a home. it's always been like that in nature, since beavers existed, they've always done such things. nothing altered the creature to do this.

Pain killers and such are unnatural, yes, but unnecessary. It's created to do something your body can do all on it's own given enough time. if your leg breaks, it's not meant to heal in the exact same position, it might mend wrong, and be useless to you. You could even possibly die, as you said, from starvation in the desert. If I didn't get that wisdom tooth surgery, I could have gotten my jaw damaged and been in pain the rest of my life, so I made an exception and bit the bullet so to speak. The vicodin seemedlike a good idea, but in the end it was unnecessary, so I didn't use it after I got over the initial pain (Vicodin also knocked me senseless the first two days, another idea I didn't like).

The organs would be removed once I died. I believe that I want my body to remain as it was at the time of death, even as it will decomposee and have criters crawling around it. The use of my organs to keep another human alive seems artificial to me, despite the fact that it's an organic material. His kidney failed, he should have died. His time had come, but now he's being kept alive through artificial means: Another kidney that was placed in him.
 

Kathinka

New member
Jan 17, 2010
1,141
0
0
i like it how it's done here in the czech republic:

EVERYONE is an organ donor by default (if the organs are usable of course), but you can go to the authorities and revoke your donating status, if you have a good reason for it.

that way the biggest problem is eliminated: not enough donor organs because most people are too lazy to get registered^^
 

NeuroticDogDad

New member
Apr 28, 2010
115
0
0
Internet Kraken said:
NeuroticDogDad said:
And the idea of you being cut open while simply unconscious during an organ transplant doesn't seem wrong?
Oh it does. It bothers me very much, and I want to avoid surgery as much as possible. But if my life is at stake, I'm going to have to get over my phobias. That doesn't meant I would be comfortable with it though. People might think my desire to cling to life is selfish, and it probably is. I just don't like the idea of being cut open and having my guts removed while I am still technically "alive", and will try to avoid it under all circumstances. Even if I am brain dead. I know people might not consider that being alive, but I do. That's the whole reason I'm uncomfortable with the process.

Besides, odds are that if you need an organ transplant you're not healthy enough to give one anyways. So the whole question seems kind of moot, unless you are questioning this from a moral standpoint. In which case I would have to wonder why you think it's acceptable to let any person die just because they won't give up their body.
I think your first point is peculiar because as far as I'm aware nobody would take organs out of a living person, coma/brain-dead or not, without permission of the next of kin. Correct me if I'm wrong but you can be an organ donor and still tell your next of kin not to pull the plug. They take the organs when you are truly dead.

On the second point I have to apologise a little because re-reading my post it appears slightly misleading. I was only trying to explain that those two methods don't force anyone to do anything. I don't think the organs for donors system is appropriate. In a fair world you'd get out what you put in but as anyone is aware this world is far from fair.
In addition life is not something to be wasted. The sheer phenomenon that is human life is so incredible that it shouldn't be lost because the person possessing it isn't rational.
However, because I appreciate human life I also appreciate organ donation as the two are linked, organs save lives.

I wish to cling to life as much as you but our definitions of life differ. In my opinion, someone who is brain-dead is dead. Someone who is dead has no opinion, aren't uncomfortable about organ donation and aren't bothered by anything because they don't exist.
 

MagicMouse

New member
Dec 31, 2009
815
0
0
Non organ donors shouldn't be eligible to receive organs at Hospitals IMO.

In a small way, yes I think you are evil.
 

Jzolr0708

New member
Apr 6, 2009
312
0
0
WHY wouldn't you become an organ donor? Seriously if you're dead, why wouldn't you want someone else suffering to have another chance at life?

To be honest? Your not evil, but your a huge hypocrit. If this was giving away you're kidney or something, I'd understand, you wouldn't want to take the chance of your's failing. But in this case, you are just being selfish.

Unless, of course, you have a religious or medical reason (IE Disease) that would prevent you from doing so, then yeah, you're a hypocrite.
 

Abedeus

New member
Sep 14, 2008
7,412
0
0
Celtic_Kerr said:
Abedeus said:
Celtic_Kerr said:
Netface said:
Celtic_Kerr said:
GrinningManiac said:
Celtic_Kerr said:
I'd like to leave the world the same way I entered it, and to be hoenst
screaming, naked, bald, slimy and inside your mother?

Eugh

OT: Not evil at all. I'm not a donor, though I haven't given it much thought. Dosen't really cocern me, which I guess is a LITTLE short-sighted...
Fully intact and all my proper parts in place
You do know that, since birth, literally every cell in your body has died and been replaced hundreds of thousands of times, right?

Would you opt out of surgery if your appendix burst? How about your tonsils? Wisdom teeth? Would reconstructive surgery using metal or plastics to replace bone count as desecration?
Well I'm alive if I'm having my appendix taken out, and it's to save my life. I'm alive if you're removing my wisdom teeth, unless you're really fucked up (which would be desecration if I'm dead), and I'm alive when you take my tonsils out, which is is preventing very nasty colds. So nope! No desecration.

I'm talking abotu desecration of my corpse, my DEAD body. If I need surgery while alive, sure.
So you'd rather let worms, maggots and predators desecrate your body than people who might help other people? You sicken me.
I'm quite glad you feel that way /sarcastic apathy

worms, maggots, and predators will still desecrate the hollow husk that is my corpse AFTER the surgeons remove my organs right? That's called nature. Organ removal and transplants is artificial in a way. I won't even take modern medicine unless in extreme circumstances, I ride my colds out, I burn and sweat my fevers out. It's natural.

Oh, and I've not gone along insulting other's points of view or for their opinions. Please keep your personal opinions to yourself simply because you don't see the world through my eyes
Oh, so it's about NOT NATURAL. Well then, I guess you should burn your clothes, hunt wild animals for their skin, eat only meat and vegetables you hunt/grow yourself (who in nature would give his food to a stranger?). If you say human nature is as it is now, then so is our medicine. Also, why are you using a computer anyway? It's not natural either.

"Sweat my fevers out". Good luck with sweating out anything but a cold or the flu.

But then again, at least you won't accept organs from someone else. Unless you want to be a hypocrite.

Oh, btw, have you been vaccinated? You know it's all modern medicine, right? Viruses and bacteria don't exist dead or weakened in nature.

In later post, you said that instead of dying, someone is artificially saved... If you really want to prove Darwin right by refusing to survive, go ahead. One less person to procreate is better for everyone else.
 

00slash00

New member
Dec 29, 2009
2,321
0
0
headshotcatcher said:
I am not an organ donor. The only reason being that I feel comfortable with it.

Though if I'd be in danger I would really appreciate getting someone's donor organ..

Am I evil?

Please be objective, I'm just wondering
they're your organs. i dont know why you WOULDNT be a donor, but its your decision
 

hawkeye52

New member
Jul 17, 2009
760
0
0
i like the system in japan where you get a civlian ID card with organs you are willing to donate on the back which you can check at any time. its just convenient and probably ends up with a lot more people donating particuarly if they are dying and want to do one final good act. at least i think thats how it works there
 

Celtic_Kerr

New member
May 21, 2010
2,166
0
0
Abedeus said:
Celtic_Kerr said:
Abedeus said:
Celtic_Kerr said:
Netface said:
Celtic_Kerr said:
GrinningManiac said:
Celtic_Kerr said:
I'd like to leave the world the same way I entered it, and to be hoenst
screaming, naked, bald, slimy and inside your mother?

Eugh

OT: Not evil at all. I'm not a donor, though I haven't given it much thought. Dosen't really cocern me, which I guess is a LITTLE short-sighted...
Fully intact and all my proper parts in place
You do know that, since birth, literally every cell in your body has died and been replaced hundreds of thousands of times, right?

Would you opt out of surgery if your appendix burst? How about your tonsils? Wisdom teeth? Would reconstructive surgery using metal or plastics to replace bone count as desecration?
Well I'm alive if I'm having my appendix taken out, and it's to save my life. I'm alive if you're removing my wisdom teeth, unless you're really fucked up (which would be desecration if I'm dead), and I'm alive when you take my tonsils out, which is is preventing very nasty colds. So nope! No desecration.

I'm talking abotu desecration of my corpse, my DEAD body. If I need surgery while alive, sure.
So you'd rather let worms, maggots and predators desecrate your body than people who might help other people? You sicken me.
I'm quite glad you feel that way /sarcastic apathy

worms, maggots, and predators will still desecrate the hollow husk that is my corpse AFTER the surgeons remove my organs right? That's called nature. Organ removal and transplants is artificial in a way. I won't even take modern medicine unless in extreme circumstances, I ride my colds out, I burn and sweat my fevers out. It's natural.

Oh, and I've not gone along insulting other's points of view or for their opinions. Please keep your personal opinions to yourself simply because you don't see the world through my eyes
Oh, so it's about NOT NATURAL. Well then, I guess you should burn your clothes, hunt wild animals for their skin, eat only meat and vegetables you hunt/grow yourself (who in nature would give his food to a stranger?). If you say human nature is as it is now, then so is our medicine. Also, why are you using a computer anyway? It's not natural either.

"Sweat my fevers out". Good luck with sweating out anything but a cold or the flu.

But then again, at least you won't accept organs from someone else. Unless you want to be a hypocrite.

Oh, btw, have you been vaccinated? You know it's all modern medicine, right? Viruses and bacteria don't exist dead or weakened in nature.
See... Why do you take it so far from context? We're talking about removing someone's organs after they've died. I believe A body should be buried as it died. Why do you have to bring clothing and computers and scavenging for food into all this? You don't sweat a flut or a cold out, as they Don't make you sweat normally. When you have a fever, you don't take medicine and you (duh) sweat till it's gone.

Besides, and this is the part where you should have REALLY paid attention, have I not metioned that if offered an organ transplant from a donor I would REFUSE it unless I changed my mind in the future, upon which I would sign my card?

Stay on topic, Don't blow out of proportion, and read my posts before you bring THIS to try and form what crosses your mind as an intelligent argument.
 

AngelOfBlueRoses

The Cerulean Prince
Nov 5, 2008
418
0
0
People here are actually quite frightening, saying that there should be an opt-out instead of an opt-in and that people who are on the donor list are the only ones who should receive organs from donors. As a libertarian, it is my belief that others can do whatever-the-hell-they-want with their body, even if it's something that I would call "wrong." It's their body, and so I shouldn't be the one to decide whether or not what they should do with theirs. Now, I'm a donor and I'm proud to be a donor. I find no reason why my organs shouldn't go to others when I'm no longer living. However, that's my view. I thought about it and could think up no reason why I shouldn't donate.

Now, Op... you're not telling us a whole lot, either. You gave us a question and asked us whether or not you're evil. You're not telling us your own views on the matter. You're not telling us any reasons for -why- you have chosen to not be a donor. Don't you think it's only natural for someone to conclude that you're being hypocritical, or even that you're stupid for not being a donor, when you've told us little to nothing about you, your views, your reasons? (I'm not reading through an entire six pages to see if he has told us anything because this is something he should tell us in his ORIGINAL POST) You're asking us to be objective while giving us not much of anything to be objective with!

tldr; He can do whatever he feels like with his body and you people shouldn't be calling him evil for it.
 

Internet Kraken

Animalia Mollusca Cephalopada
Mar 18, 2009
6,915
0
0
NeuroticDogDad said:
Internet Kraken said:
NeuroticDogDad said:
And the idea of you being cut open while simply unconscious during an organ transplant doesn't seem wrong?
Oh it does. It bothers me very much, and I want to avoid surgery as much as possible. But if my life is at stake, I'm going to have to get over my phobias. That doesn't meant I would be comfortable with it though. People might think my desire to cling to life is selfish, and it probably is. I just don't like the idea of being cut open and having my guts removed while I am still technically "alive", and will try to avoid it under all circumstances. Even if I am brain dead. I know people might not consider that being alive, but I do. That's the whole reason I'm uncomfortable with the process.

Besides, odds are that if you need an organ transplant you're not healthy enough to give one anyways. So the whole question seems kind of moot, unless you are questioning this from a moral standpoint. In which case I would have to wonder why you think it's acceptable to let any person die just because they won't give up their body.
I think your first point is peculiar because as far as I'm aware nobody would take organs out of a living person, coma/brain-dead or not, without permission of the next of kin. Correct me if I'm wrong but you can be an organ donor and still tell your next of kin not to pull the plug. They take the organs when you are truly dead.
At least from what I know, they can only take organs from you when you are brain dead. If you die completley, then your organs no longer function and wouldn't be any good as donors as a result. That is what being a donor means; you give the hospital the right to take your organs upon being brain dead without the need for consent from your family. At least this is what I learned from my mother (a nurse), and I haven't seen anything to say otherwise. Are people here posting under the assumption that you can donate all your organs when you die a normal death? As far as I know, that's not true. Which is why being a donor is far more uncomfortable for me. It means you have to give up your organs when you are brain dead. And again, while many consider brain dead and regular dead to be the same, I don't.
 

Abedeus

New member
Sep 14, 2008
7,412
0
0
Celtic_Kerr said:
NeuroticDogDad said:
Celtic_Kerr said:
Why does everyone take what I say so far from context?

Wood is natural, beavers are nature's pets, YES! It is natural. I was born with my organ within my body. I would like to die and decompose as such. THat is my current wish. These are my current thoughts. If I chose to have my life saved through organ transplants, I'll sign my own bloody donor card.

However, taking organs from one man's body and placing them in another's is articifical. Rather than dying, you are taking organs from someone's dead body, keeping them stored on ice, and then using them to keep someone alive when "Their time has come". Those are my beliefs.

You have anti-inflammitories to stop swelling, anti-biotics to stop infection, Ny-Quill to help with congestion and colds, Tylenol for headaches, pain killers for other pains, Vicodin, morphine. When I had my whisdom teeth removed, I used vicodin for two days, and then rode out the pain naturally because I hated the idea of using a man-made creation of medicine to over-ride a natural pain that came from ripping 4 teeth out of my mouth that would have caused me pain for the rest of my life (they were growing sideways towards my jaw-bone).

Your metaphor for a cast is rather vein. When did I say I would never undergo such a treatment? Read ALL my posts before you respond on one, especially if an explanatory post comes after the one you quote. A cast is VERY different from cutting open a dead body and removing organs
I do apologise because I don't think it was clear in my post but I'm not trying to say you're wrong or even necessarily change your mind but to understand you because it's quite obvious that the way we think isn't the same. Don't get excited, angry or frustrated, I'm not misquoting or taking things out of context intentionally and unfortunately I don't have the time or short term memory to either go through all your posts again and again or remember them one time through but I'm trying my best.

In the artificial/natural statement and indeed the cast analogy I'm merely trying to provide a context to your statements. It appears you selectively choose what you're comfortable with without a clear trend as to the natural or artificial.
Organ transplants are artificial and you're not comfortable with them but a cast is artificial and you would be ok with it?
Both the dental procedure you underwent and the vicodin are artificial and you were ok with one but not the other?

You also didn't explain why you considered the dam natural and organ transplants unnatural. Both are simply creations of creatures of the earth. "Artifical" simply means made by man, man being part of nature.
In fact, I never understood why artificial and natural are antonyms. Have you got any opinions on why that is?

As a side note, should we continue in this off-topic way or should I create a specific thread for this discussion?
Think of it this way. The human body was created to stop in the middle of a forest and drink swamp water. We used to be able to digest SWAMP water like it was filtered crystal clear sping water. Now men are ebing told you have to drink mineral bottled water because it's all that's good for you. It's against the way the human body was designed.

A beaver builds a dam in order to create a home. it's always been like that in nature, since beavers existed, they've always done such things. nothing altered the creature to do this.

Pain killers and such are unnatural, yes, but unnecessary. It's created to do something your body can do all on it's own given enough time. if your leg breaks, it's not meant to heal in the exact same position, it might mend wrong, and be useless to you. You could even possibly die, as you said, from starvation in the desert. If I didn't get that wisdom tooth surgery, I could have gotten my jaw damaged and been in pain the rest of my life, so I made an exception and bit the bullet so to speak. The vicodin seemedlike a good idea, but in the end it was unnecessary, so I didn't use it after I got over the initial pain (Vicodin also knocked me senseless the first two days, another idea I didn't like).

The organs would be removed once I died. I believe that I want my body to remain as it was at the time of death, even as it will decomposee and have criters crawling around it. The use of my organs to keep another human alive seems artificial to me, despite the fact that it's an organic material. His kidney failed, he should have died. His time had come, but now he's being kept alive through artificial means: Another kidney that was placed in him.
Holy crap dude. You really want to live "as God intended", then go live in a bush in some jungle, fighting animals and other inhabitants of the good old swamp. Pain killers unnatural? You are a moron and you don't know that about half of the drugs have existed in form of HERBS. People ate them, crushed them into powder, cream and so on and treated wounds with them.

Also, wow at people resorting to vicodin because of a tooth pain. Seriously? Oh, and next time you need a break surgery or you have a headache, use the same method cavemen used - a sharp-edged rock and hitting the place it hurts. Didn't work, and in 95% the patient died, but you didn't use any of the unnatural METAL stuff. Which animal uses metals? Or chemicals, or elements besides the basic ones, existing in nature everywhere (water, air and so on)?

Seems to me like you dislike the evolution process of mankind. Hope you don't have kids. I mean, you shouldn't. In the good old days, people had kids when they were 12-13. My sister would've been a grandma by now. But hey, I might be wrong. I mean, the average age of death in the good old days was about 30-40 years...