So basically you are so conceded that you think that

means "OMG I take you srs!"
You aren't as clever as you might think (at least I know I'm not that clever).
I find it funny that you were talking about character defamation and all you appear to be trying to do is that.
There are tons of things with my level of understanding that I can't prove, like how the sun works, or the chemical reactions of your stomach, the lower level activities of the human brain, migratory patterns of birds.
However in the case of most of these, it isn't necessarily about proving them as much as examining the harm in assuming that they are true things that actually happen.
What would come of renewable energy sources (of which we have plenty, environmentalist drama aside we have extremely well thought out nuclear power options)? Where exactly is the harm in not using oil or coal (outside of a few areas where it really is the only viable option that I can think of)?
I just find it odd that people would assume that there is absolutely no negative side effects to releasing far higher levels of emissions in various gasses than the earth is used to. I am 100% certain the earth will survive, I highly doubt we'll cause a Venus effect. But in the long run I'm pretty sure that a bunch of pretentious ass hats are going to ***** and moan until there really is no going back at least for life as we know it.
Lots of shit that we eat is not as hardy as we are (adaptability wise, since we have technology to 'cheat' with).
But regardless. I'll leave it here. You are demanding a science paper on a video game forum after being a prick which doesn't exactly promote a deep educated response. Which might be your strategy. If so I commend you on mission successful.