You just made that make and play thing up.wolfgamesstudios said:are we NOT protected under the (second?) constitution to print/ read (make and play) freely?
You just made that make and play thing up.wolfgamesstudios said:are we NOT protected under the (second?) constitution to print/ read (make and play) freely?
We're talking about the Halo entirely about killing people, right?wolfgamesstudios said:it barely even has any violence
The Custer's Revenge comment there almost just made my day. I thank you. Have a cookie.x434343 said:What game is LFD? Liberty Forces Divided?
And the ESRB is in place for a reason. Custer's Revenge was one of the things that caused it.
I didn't know we were classifying them now. Very accurate as well. I feel like ones missing though...Glefistus said:I am legally considered an adult in the eyes of the state, so I am allowed to play these games. I like the idea of the ESRB, stopping children from getting mature games, solely for the reason it keeps more of them off the multiplayer. I am sorry, but "screamers", "I-just-discovered-swear-word-ers", and "Heliums" are very annoying online.
Why don't we just steal Europe's 15+ rating..?Smagmuck08 said:Enigmers said:I think there should be a rating between "T" and "M," like what they added between "E" and "T." The reasoning being that I think a lot of violent games are rated "M" because they're marginally worse than something the ESRB thinks a 13-year-old can handle.
Care to have any ideas on what to call this new rating?
Cortana was naked...when did this happen?wolfgamesstudios said:p.s. cortanas 'private areas' are barely even visible so wtf??
She's not she's just curvyIanBrazen said:Cortana was naked...when did this happen?wolfgamesstudios said:p.s. cortanas 'private areas' are barely even visible so wtf??
The second constitution. As in not the Articles of ConfederationDistinctlyBenign said:I'm 21.
I don't care what rating a game has.
EDIT: Also, you clearly don't understand the constitution if you think this falls under the second amendment.
I was actually thinking about this before, in that everything up to T stays the same, but then you have a T 16+, M becomes 18, and AO gets bumped up to 21skywalkerlion said:Uhh..is it E 13+? Sorry to come off arrogant, I'm just guessing >.>Smagmuck08 said:Enigmers said:I think there should be a rating between "T" and "M," like what they added between "E" and "T." The reasoning being that I think a lot of violent games are rated "M" because they're marginally worse than something the ESRB thinks a 13-year-old can handle.
Care to have any ideas on what to call this new rating?
we should have to take a test. because there are actually some ok children under thhe age of 25.thiosk said:I'm old enough to think that children under 25 shouldn't be allowed on the internet.
Spooky stuff, that internets.