I just uninstalled Skyrim

Recommended Videos

Ragsnstitches

New member
Dec 2, 2009
1,871
0
0
Savagezion said:
I have been playing/experiencing Skyrim since release night mostly on PS3. I don't see the issues everyone else are claiming. That is not to say they aren't there. But I don't know anyone who is experiencing them either. If it weren't for those videos, I would be hard pressed to believe it. I don't think my file sizes have never exceed 5-6MB though despite being 200 hours in.
I'll tell you right now that the PS3 lag does exist and it can be awful. The thing is it's tied to the size of your save file (over 8mb you will start to see lag after extended periods of play, over 10mb and you'll be lucky to get an hour out of it before it starts to chug).

I mentioned in an earlier post that the lag got to me in one of my playthroughs. My response was to create a new character. I still have the old saves when they (hopefully) fix the lag in a future patch (1.4 cross my fingers).

I don't regret it mind you. I love experimenting with character builds and types. So far I have run as a Nord warrior (light armour, archery, one handed and blocking), a Breton Mage (Destruction Conjuration Enchanting and Restoration) and a Nord berserker (2 handed, Heavy armour, archery and smithing).

I have plans to try stealth focused characters soon and when I'm familiar with the functions of each perk tree I will do some crossover classes like Battlemages, Spellswords and so on.
 

BaronUberstein

New member
Jul 14, 2011
385
0
0
Skin said:
BaronUberstein said:
But...what about us to genuinely like the game? I would hardly call it a peice of shit, because it's fun for me! I enjoy killing dragons, firing arrows poisoned with Fury into a crowd, walking across the land and arriving in town with a pile of wolf furs. Sometimes it's funny when I play a character one way, only to get a message from a friend saying they have to meet me an hour early. I decided to finish the mission, but is there time for a sneaky attack on that bandit fort? Nope, time to charge and see what happens!
Like I said before, you could have the most fun in your life smudging your feces all over the living room wall. I can't say "no, you did not have fun" because you did.

The game is lacking from a technical and comparative stand point. All the people who brought up the pro's of this game did so comparing it to Oblivion and Morrowind. I find that quite amusing.
Well, I never played any other games by Bethesda, but the game doesn't seem that lacking technically to me. But then you have to ask, who cares about the technology if it's fun?
 

prigdishnak

New member
Jan 17, 2012
16
0
0
I ended up getting caught up in the 'Oh look dragons!' delight of the games advertiseing. :3 I bought it on day 1, and got to 155 hours in it over a couple months. ^^ And promptly uninstalled it and havent had even the slighest interest in playing it since. >.> Now, I admit, I played Morrowind but never Oblivion. I'm an Argonian and they looked like hell in Oblivion to me. :3 Never played, never will. ^^ I really enjoyed Skyrim for the first oooohhh 75 hours. ^^ Looked fantastic. :D Way way better then Morrowind in that regard. ^^ But after completeing quite alot the fact nothing I ever did would change anyones opinion of me ever in game, and that after I was done with 99% of NPCs I never had to consider their existence again. o.o Hit me like a shot. I did go in with some rather lofty hopes I admit. I was expecting alot more form the magic if nothing else. >.> I was full mage. >:3 Not that it really mattered since all the 'cool deaths' were given fully to the warrior and rouge. :p But even after you are ruler of a city and you cant really change anything about it...*crickets chirp*....really makes me question what the hell I am doing. o.o So, in conclusion. :D Good game, enjoyed playing it, doubt if I will ever be interested in an Elder Scrolls game ever again unless it is all about the Argonians and/or Black Marsh and even if such a miracle were to happen I would wait 2 months before buying it to see if once again I would be dropped in The Land of Willfully Ignorant Immortals. >:3
 

wintercoat

New member
Nov 26, 2011
1,691
0
0
Skyrim is...heh...it's something, I'll give it that. I still can't get over the corpse-like stiffness of the npcs' faces. When will Bethesda learn to stop making their characters look like they're coated in wax?

Bugs cannot be dismissed with a wave of the hand, especially for a AAA title with the resources of a company like Bethesda, when smaller companies who release games with large open worlds are ripped to shreds for them. And Skyrim has plenty of them. All faults must be considered when judging something.

The two sides of the civil war are horrible. The Imperials are, well, imperialistic conquerors who care nothing about the lands they conquer, just about having control over everything, and overall are a bunch of assholes, while the Nords are a bunch of racist, "we're better than everyone else" jackasses, and I swear, if they were to win, I could see their nation imploding within a few months, because somebody is going to assassinate Ulfric for being such a huge god damned douche. I didn't side with either and ended up just slaughtering the lot of them out of sheer frustration.

If it didn't have the Elder Scrolls name to cling to, it would have been shit on left and right, but because it does, it gets a pass, which is horrible.
 

Mythrignoc

New member
Oct 17, 2009
77
0
0
Crono1973 said:
Mythrignoc said:
Crono1973 said:
Mythrignoc said:
Crono1973 said:
Mythrignoc said:
It's the media hype that leads people to believe it's either going to be the best damn game in the world, or a horrifying disappointment.

However, if people were to try and take Skyrim for what it is, it's a pretty damn good game with a solid, even if cliched story.

Skyrim to me is a major improvement over oblivion on every area. The combat is much more intense and interactive (simply moving back and forth while striking isn't the end all tactic like it was in Morrowind and Oblivion), spells are far more dynamic and balanced (no powerleveling the shit out of alteration just by casting it while destruction is left behind), the NPC's while redundant, at least have far more interesting things to say (I'd TOTALLY fucking take the Arrow to the Knee comments over "I saw a mudcrab the other day, disgusting things. Bye."), and there are countless other things that work so well in this.

Is it perfect? Absolutely not. Does it have flaws, more than enough to occasionally break a game. But, if you can look past some of the inconsistencies, flaws and bugs, it can be a great gaming experience.

That said, if you can't look past the bugs/flaws in a game as massive as this then no, you won't enjoy the game and you're also kind of an idiot to think that this game would be perfect.


Bethesda isn't about perfection; their forte lies in scale and epicness. Bit by bit, they're improving their formula for combining that with the "Be whatever you want to be, and do whatever you want to do" sort of gameplay and while I don't imagine the next game will be the golden ticket either, personally, I'm patient enough to give them a chance.

After the catastrofuck that was oblivion, this game fixed about 90% of my issues with oblivion and gave me a really wonderful experience, and while I hated bethesda before for what they did with oblivion, I can't overlook how much they've improved and I think they deserve some credence.
It seems to me that comments like yours (and there are many) are really saying that those who hate Oblivion will be the most likely to love Skyrim. To me, that is evidence enough of how far Skyrim has strayed from the expectations of TES fans. In short, Bethesda sold out TES fans.
Umm....you realize you just contradictd yourself in an amazingly stupid fashion right?

Let me break it down to you.

My comment is about how much skyrim is an improvement over oblivion and so your case is that this is Bethesda selling out to fans.

Yet in the exact same paragraph, you say that our ("our" meaning TES fans) expectations were strayed from in the release of skyrim, i.e. we didn't get what WE want.

Furthermore, Bethesda is owned by bethsoft, and bethsoft is part of bethesda, so basically it's "bethesda presents a bethesda game."

This basically means that bethesda created a fantastic game of their own design and choosing, pandered to NO one, and yet some how they're selling out to people who didn't get what they want?


Do you see the logic in that because I sure don't.
Your post makes no sense. I can't respond to it.

Let me clarify what I was saying.

There are alot of people who say "I hated Oblivion but loved Skyrim". Well, that is evidence that Skyrim is VERY different from Oblivion.
Okay...yeah, that's a totally different thing you just said.

Yes, I do agree with you that Skyrim is an incredibly different game than oblivion, even if it uses the same engine and has the same 'feel' of oblivion.

However, what you originally said was that bethesda sold out which is a VERY different sentiment.

And no, my post doesn't make any sense mainly because I was trying to make sense of your oxymoron. Bethesda sold out to its fans but its fans didn't get what they wanted. I'm not sure how that's selling out, but even if it is, then how do you sell out to your fans without giving them what they want?
Oh wow,

Skyrim is extremely different from Oblivion and so the fans of Oblivion (the last TES games) were sold out to a more mainstream (let's bring cinematic kills in and take out attributes) audience. This is why there are so many who hate Oblivion but love Skyrim.

Look, if this isn't clear enough then just drop it.
Ah, I see now. It makes so much sense.

Skyrim uses a system that you don't really like and you prefer the number crunching monotony of morrowind and oblivion instead. And because a LOT of people do like the new system, then bethesda is to be blamed for selling out.

You like things that no one else likes, prefer mainstream to not be mainstream, and hate things everyone else likes.

You're a hipster.



Seriously, if the system of Skyrim actually works well, and it DOES, what the hell is the problem with a game developer trying to reach a broader demographic? News flash, skyrim needs to make money for the next game to come out. That's how business works, basic economics.

By the by, selling out is the compromise of integrity, morality, or principles in exchange for money. It's quite clear they're working their ass off trying to make the game series better all the time; there will always be flaws but they are trying to make the game an enjoyable experience for both them and you, that's not selling out, that's being a good game developer.

Madden 20xx, THAT'S a game that is selling out. In the past three years at least, the games are nothing but roster updates. Mechanical changes are horrifyingly rare, and it's clear EA only wants to make a quick buck on these games.

Call of Juarez delivers blatant misinformation in order to spice up the story of the mexican drug cartel, that's selling out.

No sir, making a game fun, challenging and accessible to the people who want to buy it, that's the exact opposite of selling out, that's what people -expect- of a game developer.

Sorry but this isn't a matter of opinion anymore, you literally have it wrong here.
 

UsefulPlayer 1

New member
Feb 22, 2008
1,776
0
0
Sounds like you played all the popular Elder Scrolls, possibly to some great length too.

You know what's weird? I did too. Although....it could have been because I like those games......

I thought Skyrim was incredibly immersive. I've lived many lives in the game. I don't know why people keep saying it's not an RPG. I think its because people are addicted to the Bioware dialogue option kinda RPG. I mean Skyrim is the game with the most choice. You can pick any direction and adventure. Hide and steal people blind. Have dinner and then sleep with your wife. When you put it in that light, other games seem pretty linear to me.
 

Epicspoon

New member
May 25, 2010
841
0
0
Duffeknol said:
well good for you I for one like the game but I don't even use mods. I have to admit however, it is a bit weird when you're walking along the wilderness and a levitating mammoth attacks you.
 

PhantomEcho

New member
Nov 25, 2011
165
0
0
The problem that arises most times when people play an Elder Scrolls game... is that they don't realize that they ALL have suffered from pretty much this exact same problem. From Arena to Skyrim, the fact of the matter is: "You can't account for the actions of a player when you allow them to do 'anything they want' in your game."

Well, you can... but your development cycle would be a decade, and it would probably be the only redeeming function of your game.

In fact, the same problem arises in Fallout 3 and New Vegas... although I feel those two games deserve some credit for having a narrative that directs you far more... directly... than any Elder Scrolls game ever has.

But in the end, these games are playgrounds. They're not supposed to hold your hand and guide you. Those things were tacked on in an attempt to draw in new players, and I'm sorry that so many have gotten sucked in without realizing it.

These games are, and always have been, games for the person who wants to "Live a life in a fantasy universe rife with lore and baddies to kill."

You bring your own adventure to the game. If you rely on the half-assed one the game provides you with, you probably aren't going to come away with a positive experience.
 

Varitel

New member
Jan 22, 2011
257
0
0
Until technology improves, you will have this trade-off between open-world and variety. The more the player is allowed to do, the more the developers have to account for, and the less time/money/disk-space they have for everything else. I get it, I want and dynamic world with dynamic characters to be in the game as well. The only differece between you and I is that I wasn't actually expecting them to be there in the first place.
 

Adiona

Mistress of Evil
Mar 25, 2008
82
0
0
It's alright....the bugs, the lag, the lack of character depth etc etc. I'm only playing it not to plat it on the PS3. That's the only reason, it's game I will forget about pretty quickly once I've finished it.
 

Duruznik

New member
Aug 16, 2009
408
0
0
Fishyash said:
Did... did you just link to TV Tropes in the first reply to this thread? Damnit man, I wanted to get stuff done today!

OT: So, you didn't like Skyrim, but played it through? ...That's just silly. Not everyone has to like every popular game. It's only natural.
 

Gatx

New member
Jul 7, 2011
1,458
0
0
I don't understand why these "I don't like [popular franchise]," or "Explain to me why [popular franchise] is so good" type topics are so common. I get it, differing opinions and all that, but no need to announce it to everyone.

Anyway I've also uninstalled the game... after putting in over 110 hours. I actually liked the game myself but I've satisfied my Elder Scrolls craving for the time being and needed to free up some space on my hard drive.
 

Snotnarok

New member
Nov 17, 2008
6,310
0
0
Atmos Duality said:
Snotnarok said:
I really don't get why so many people, since the game came out have been coming out to announce that the game isn't good to them.
Conversely, I was confused why so many MORE people were heralding Skyrim as Game of the Year...months before it was even released and any of them had played it.

Ignoring the futility of arguing differing opinions for a moment, at least the people who DON'T like the game since it came out are more rational than those who DID like the game before it did come out.

That said. The OP doesn't like the game. There...really isn't much relevant discussion beyond that. I didn't like it; but it's not like that will stop others from potentially enjoying it.

*shrugs*
I don't care if someone doesn't like a game (I usually care when they're barking at me how good it is when I don't like it) but it just seems to be cool to hate popular games on the escapist. I think the Escapist has a unspoken rule that it's okay to call CoD players morons and get away with it, because I've seen it happen a lot. Yet if I said say everyone who likes Kingdom Hearts is an idiot I'm sure I'd have a few reports on me. Hell I've had a few people give me lectures why Zelda is so great when A- it's subjective, B- I've played them all and hated them C-Leave me alone.

So I'm not so much saying that OP should enjoy said game, I am however wondering if OP/people here are just simply hating a game because it's popular. Like the constant influx of "Why is Half Life 2/Portal/Final Fantasy VII/Skyrim/Fallout so popular? I just thought it was stupid!"
 

Hamish Durie

New member
Apr 30, 2011
1,210
0
0
Hazy said:
Kopikatsu said:
I find it strange that if someone compliments a game, a ton of people pour in and are like 'OH YEAH, GREAT GAME. LOVE YOU, OP.' But if someone says a game is bad, a ton of people pour in and are like 'THAT'S YOUR OPINION. WE DON'T HAVE TO LISTEN TO YOU. GO AWAY! LALALALALALALA'
I like to call this "Bioware syndrome" for obvious reasons.
really I call it "The internet"
 

TomLikesGuitar

Elite Member
Jul 6, 2010
1,003
0
41
Hamish Durie said:
Hazy said:
Kopikatsu said:
I find it strange that if someone compliments a game, a ton of people pour in and are like 'OH YEAH, GREAT GAME. LOVE YOU, OP.' But if someone says a game is bad, a ton of people pour in and are like 'THAT'S YOUR OPINION. WE DON'T HAVE TO LISTEN TO YOU. GO AWAY! LALALALALALALA'
I like to call this "Bioware syndrome" for obvious reasons.
really I call it "The internet"
It's more the way he's saying it.

He clearly started this thread to argue with fans about why he dislikes a game which is really popular... and that's a really obnoxious thing to do. Just admit there are good things about it and move on. Skyrim does a lot of things really well and it screws a lot of things up.

It doesn't deserve the intense hate that it is getting and I have a strong feeling that the OP has been hating on Skyrim since the day it came out.

EDIT: LOL I'm sorry, I mean since BEFORE the day it came out.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/9.322297-Skryim-is-outdated#13194511