GaiderDraco said:
SonicWaffle, I understand how you feel. I feel the same way, here and there towards movies, as well as games; mostly contemporary, though. Never classics. But I must defend "Red Dead Redemption" and beg the question: why on Earth would your first playthrough consist of completing the side-quests as well as the single-player campaign? There's a reason as to why the letters that appear on your mini map are for "story based missions only".
Why on Earth does anyone need trophies? And why does everyone need to do everything possible and as quickly as possible instead of taking their time? But alas, that is for another thread.
D.
Did you notice the part where I said that I had really enjoyed Red Dead?
As for completing side quests and such, it is because I rarely play games twice. I simply don't see the point, when I can do everything in a single playthrough. Also, because they were fun, often more fun than the story missions were, and generally hunting a specific creature is more of a challenge than the standard 'go here, shoot dudes' missions.
I'm really not sure why you've inferred that I rushed through the game, and in fact I'm quite baffled. You say;
why on Earth would your first playthrough consist of completing the side-quests as well as the single-player campaign? There's a reason as to why the letters that appear on your mini map are for "story based missions only".
I'm a film person and RDR is the closest thing to a cinematic game than I'd ever played, aside from Shadow of the Colossus. Now, I love the bounty hunter missions and helping out random strangers but it's not part of the story and so a story-driven first playthrough, to me is more rewarding. If the game is great as a whole, as we know it is then after completing it I do all of the stuff I didn't. get a chance to on the first playthrough that aren't story related. And If you'd have passed the game you'd notice that even through the story concludes the game doesn't; it lets you do everything you still want or need to.
It doesn't stack up. On the one hand, you're saying I should have rushed through the main quest and ignored all the other things to do, and on the other you're complaining that people don't take their time with games. Which is it?
I wrote the last two paragraphs as "two separate paragraphs" denoting two separate trains of thought, slightly unrelated. I also mentioned that the latter paragraph is probably suitable for "another thread".
But don't worry about it, I play, maybe, 5 or 6 games per year so I don't really have much ground here. And I don't think I have a place on this thread because I'm not really a gamer. This is the first Rockstar Games video game that I'd actually completed because, unlike all of the other GTA games I wasn't bored within a couple of hours. The story kept me going because it was damn good, all the way through to the credits and I also love Westerns.
If you want, you can forget that I posted here because I'm a film guy and not a gamer.
D.