I didn't read all of that argument. I just wanted to know if I was correct in my interpretation that the interview was already consented to and recorded, at which point someone asked if they would not utilize its footage?Secondhand Revenant said:... is this on purpose or did you not use read the past page?Namehere said:If that was the issue a simple statement of: 'No further comment' and then walking away normally does the trick. I was under the impression the interview was already recorded and they didn't want it aired. That is an entirely different matter.Secondhand Revenant said:I think it's terrible you don't think women can take back consent during sex. It was still being filmed. Also it wasn't shown to anyone yet. So not a past event! Really, you shouldn't support not being able to stop giving consent.FogHornG36 said:NOOOOOO You don't get to reinterpret what she said to make you feel better, the black chick was saying, isn't it ironic that you are not letting them take back consent after the fact?: when talking about being on camera, The irony is based on the feminist idea that woman should be able to take bake consent after sex.Skatologist said:FogHornG36 said:snip1. That was a weird cut at the end. One that looked as though the black woman was going to continue to talk.Adam Jensen said:snap
2.You do realize what that black woman could have meant, right? Withdrawing consent from sex while having it? Or even just withdrawing consent prior to the act while initially saying "yes"?
It doesn't work your way because the filming is already done.
I'm displeased with his absurd insistence on comparing it to removing consent after sex, suggesting that it is what she meant, and his lie that it is a feminist idea.
As for whether or not ANYTHING is a FEMINIST idea, I have no comment. Every time someone says something is or isn't feminism a hoard of this or that or other types comes out and denounces it, then begin fight among themselves. I wouldn't bother myself with it. I will say that I have heard these arguments before, along with men can't be raped, and god knows how many other absurdities. Best thing to do to my mind is ignore them.
I wouldn't be bothered to interpret what the woman who requested the interview footage not be used was attempting to say, and I wouldn't advise anyone else be bothered either.
It is the journalism aspect that I found curious and... frankly not wholly unexpectedly depressingly poorly managed. One does not cover an event as an impartial conveyor of information whilst simultaneously hosting a counter event. That was without question unprofessional.
I will lend you this bit of advice though, from Nero Wolfe - actually I think it was Archie who said it: 'The best way to get the idea someone's guilty out of your mind is to find another suspect.' Put another way, if that wasn't what the woman meant, it might help to make a suggestion as to what she did mean, and help ease the overburdened minds you're dealing with. Assuming you have a better interpretation? As I said, I wouldn't bother interpreting one way or the other. The whole discussion was juvenile.